Pete Buttigieg Says Majority Agrees With Dems Despite What Algorithms Indicate (THIS Is...
Greg Gutfeld Shreds Jessica Tarlov in VICIOUS Back and Forth About SPLC Funding...
Media (and Dems) Don't Mind Anonymous Sources for Hit Pieces but NOT When...
SHOCK FOOTAGE: Fairfax Democrat Caught on Video STEALING Vote No Info From Election...
FBI Gets Some Other Tips After Arresting US Soldier Accused of Insider Trading...
DAMNING Thread BUSTS Spanberger for Being Even SHADIER in Redistricting (GUESS What She...
Here Are 3 Calif. Economic Comparisons to the Nat'l Average That Gavin Newsom...
'TIRED of the SWAMP!' Rep. Brandon Gill DOG-WALKS John Cornyn and His (Spanish)...
If You Donate to Harvard's 'Viewpoint Diversity' Scam, You Are Probably Dumb Enough...
Hero or Hustler? Special Forces Operator Busted for Wagering (and Winning Big) On...
Hakeem Jeffries Can’t Quit Ron DeSantis — Calls Him Boring While He Sounds...
ABC News Breaks Ground: 6 PM Confirmed as Dinner Time – Nation Shocked,...
Podcaster Jennifer Welch: Dems Schumer and Jeffries Are Acting Like Trump’s ‘Fascist Colla...
A Lesson In Deflection: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Boy’s Question on ‘Take Your...
Pallywood Employing Child Actors for Its Latest Propaganda Campaign
Premium

Harvard Prof Threatened After His Study Showed No Racial Bias in Police Shootings

Anthony Cabassa

NBC News has done whole stories on how Chaya Raichik and Libs of TikTok lead to bomb threats every time they expose something the Left put out there on purpose for people to see. Sometimes a threat to the narrative is so dangerous that people resort to threats. A Harvard professor did a study concluding that there is no racial bias in police shootings, despite what we've been led to believe by Black Lives Matter. Cops — even black cops — are white supremacists just itching to kill black men.

What?

Fox News reports:

When Fryer claimed the data showed "no racial differences in officer-involved shootings," he said, "all hell broke loose," and his life was upended. 

The world-renowned economist knew from comments by faculty that he was likely to garner backlash. Fryer admitted that he anticipated the results of the study would be different and would confirm suspicions of racial bias against minorities. When the results found no racial bias, Fryer hired eight new assistants and redid the study. The data came back the same.

"I was going to the grocery store to get diapers with the armed guard. It was crazy. It was really, truly crazy," he said.

Fryer said he received "the first of many complaints and threats four minutes after publication." Fryer's 2016 study on racial bias in Houston policing was the recent topic of a conversation with Bari Weiss.

Why would he receive threats? Because people couldn't handle the narrative being challenged. They needed to believe that police were targeting blacks in shootings. Why? Because they'd been virtue signaling about it and didn't want to be proved wrong. The mainstream media certainly picks and chooses which incidents on which to report; they're complicit.

Black Lives Matter raked in millions of corporate dollars on the platform that police were racist. It was something the nation wanted to believe, and people marched in the streets even during the COVID epidemic, because racism was also a public health issue.

***

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos