Watch President Biden Invent an Entirely New Amount of Money (Maybe This Was...
Miranda Devine Reminds NY Times (and Others) Why Hunter Biden Indictments Don't Link...
Breaking: Actor Ryan O’Neal Dead At 82
X User Asks Question of 2A Community and is Unprepared for Response
Friday Fun: We Give You #FluteGuy
Friday Fun: Homeowner Finds Exterminator's Notebook, Hilarity Ensues
Good Luck With That: Prime Minister Of Barbados Demands $4.9 Trillion In Reparations
'Things That Make You Go Hmm': Map Of Charitable Giving Is Eye Opening
Florida Democrats Send Letter to DeSantis to End Non-Existent 'Book Bans'
The Hypocrisy Caucus: Anti-Israel Democrats Have Audacity to Celebrate Chanukah and Denoun...
Biden Avoids Reporters but KJP Assures America the President Is 'Proud of His...
LAPD Says They're Aware of Possible Upcoming 'First Amendment Activity' in Los Angeles......
Twitter Wrecks Journos Using Pictures of Hamas Prisoners to Try to Decry 'Western...
Is It Just Me or are Antisemites REALLY Stupid? Here Are a Few...
Harvard President Desperately Backpedals in Harvard Crimson Interview, But Will it Save He...

Did Chief Justice John Roberts out the whistleblower by refusing to read Rand Paul's question?

As Twitchy reported earlier, Chief Justice John Roberts declined to read Sen. Rand Paul’s question regarding whether two NSC staffers might have worked together “to plot impeaching the president before there were formal house impeachment proceedings,” as has been reported on some conservative websites. “The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted,” Roberts said.


Instead, Paul posted his question in full to Twitter, and this afternoon, he held a brief press conference to read his question to journalists to get it into the public record. Of course, the big controversy is whether Paul was trying to “out” the alleged whistleblower with his question as if being a whistleblower prevented you from being identified; it only protects you from retaliation at your workplace.

Notice how hostile the journalists are: “Shouldn’t you be in the Senate right now?” one asks. He should, but what’s the point if his question goes unasked and unanswered. And of course, if not even Rep. Adam Schiff knows who the whistleblower is, as he repeated Wednesday, how could Paul know if he’s naming him or her?

A lot of people in C-SPAN’s comments think Paul should be handcuffed and locked up for “outing” the whistleblower in his question, so they must know more than Schiff.

Silence which name? Which one is the whistleblower? Is either one the whistleblower? Not even Schiff knows.


Yeah, relax everyone.





Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos