Rep. Jamaal Bowman Claims There's a Ceasefire on the Table to End Netanyahu's...
Trump Threatened With Prison Time, Mad-Maxine's Meltdown!
You're Lying: Biden Smacked DOWN for Gaslighting About Wages 'Outpacing' Inflation'
Cue the Tiny Violins! Princeton Hunger Strikers Get ZERO Sympathy for Whining About...
I've Formed My Own Google Encampment to Demand FREE SPEECH (Here's the 1st...
Judge Tosses Challenge to NY Ammo Background Checks
'Islamists Who Hate ... Well, Everyone.' Jesse Kelly Breaks Down 'Proxy War' Groups...
GRRL, BYE! Bethany S. Mandel DROPS AOC After She Cheers Biden for Withholding...
Oh Joy! Bernie Sanders Is Running Again for the Senate
WATCH MSNBC Host (Cringe) As Maxine Waters RANTS About Trump Orgs 'in the...
Corey DeAngelis Takes Public Schools APART By Explaining What We Should REALLY Call...
David Hogg Brags BIG TIME After Young Dem Wins Texas District ... There's...
Terrorists Win: Columbia University Officially Cancels Commencement
'OMG, You're SO Fetch!' Lefty White College Girls Post Pro-Hamas Selfie and HOO...
Mr. Wonderful Drops a Truth-Bomb on Pro-Hamas Agitators

Dream on: Washington Post runs piece on getting rid of Justice Brett Kavanaugh without impeaching him

Even before Sen. Dianne Feinstein dropped that letter she’d been sitting on for six weeks, there were plenty of wishful thinking articles and tweets about how even if Judge Brett Kavanaugh were confirmed, he could be impeached after he was seated.

Advertisement

Kavanaugh has been seated, but the anti-Kavanaugh faction isn’t giving up yet. In the Washington Post Wednesday, University of Chicago law professor Aziz Huq argued that there are two ways to remove Kavanaugh from the Supreme Court that don’t rely on impeachment.

In short, here they are:

In the first, a new president would nominate and the Senate would confirm by majority vote a justice — in this case Kavanaugh — to a different post on an intermediate court of appeals (say the D.C. Circuit, where Kavanaugh formerly served). The justice would, in effect, be demoted.

That brings us to the second alternative method of relieving a justice of his or her duties. In a 2006 article in the Yale Law Journal, two scholars (conservatives, as it happens), Saikrishna Prakash and Steven D. Smith, amassed historical evidence that the Framers understood the “good behavior” standard to be judicially, rather than just politically, enforceable.

Little good has come from the Kavanaugh confirmation process. But Kavanaugh opponents have a rare chance to push for a positive institutional change as they press their immediate agenda. If the political stars align, something good for our constitutional democracy might result from their efforts: a better way to discipline errant federal judges.

Advertisement

Discipline Kavanaugh for what, exactly?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement