Remember When Colbert Liked Trump (and Why)? Wow, Did THAT Backfire
Sen. Chris Murphy Did NOT Think Trump's Farewell to Colbert was Funny (He...
President Trump Flexes His Political Muscle in GOP Primaries
Greg Gutfeld and Clay Travis Spot a Reason Colbert Might Have Gotten Canceled...
Propaganda Performer: Democrats Thank Stephen Colbert Online for His Years of Service to...
Let's Compare Other Late-Night Hosts' Finale Viewership to Numbers Colbert's Media Fans Ar...
Trump Trolls Colbert with Hilarious AI Video of Throwing Him in the Dumpster
Tulsi Leaves DNI Role to Care for Husband Abraham — A Heartwarming Example...
The Snake Emerges: Adam Schiff's Heartless Jab at Tulsi Amid Her Husband's Cancer...
POPCORN! FCC Chair Brendan Carr Asks for Public Comment About ABC's 'Bona Fide...
Moan of ‘Arc’: CNN’s Kasie Hunt Has ‘Grave’ Concerns About Trump’s America 250...
Reuters Gets Shredded for Anon 'Person Familiar With the Matter' Spin on Tulsi...
Power Hungry: Wasserman Schultz Invades Majority-Black District After Redistricting Wipes...
Rep. Thanedar Slammed as Disgusting and Vile for Attacking Tulsi Gabbard While Her...
DNC's Photo Tribute to Colbert Speaks Volumes About What the Show Was REALLY...

Guardian writer: Pro-life messages don't belong on public property

As Twitchy reported earlier today, Planned Parenthood is at last making good on its long-standing threat to file suit against the Center for Medical Progress, which released a series of videos showing Planned Parenthood administrators haggling over the price of organs and abortionists describing in detail their “crunching” techniques for preserving the most desired fetal body parts.

Advertisement

While it looks like the courts will determine if the CMP’s undercover sting of Planned Parenthood violated any laws, NARAL took the unbelievable step today of copying and tweeting this nugget from yesterday’s issue of the Guardian. Obviously the U.S. Constitution states that abortion is a right, but putting up pro-life messages on public property where people might see them? Won’t someone think of these poor clowns? They need to be rested and funny when they reach their stop.

Writer Andy Kopsa’s specific complaint is that pro-choicers “can make up their own facts” but “they ought be limited to spreading that harmful and deadly rhetoric on private property, not public.” Last week, however, the group Louisiana Right To Life set up banners showing a 19-month-old fetus alongside the message, “Give Her a Chance.”

This, she argues, is “a purely religious message” which 1) had to be approved by the city and the department of public works, and 2) hangs from streetlights and other publicly funded infrastructure, which means that taxpayers are being forced to “subsidize a proliferation of anti-abortion rhetoric.”

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/LetsBanEvrythng/status/687772333365305344

Just because the group is pro-life doesn’t make it a religious entity, though.

Your First Amendment holds no power against the city’s department of public works.

Advertisement

Are you kidding? Imagine if Planned Parenthood received even one taxpayer dime of funding …

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement