Karmelodramatic Response: Emotional Court TV Contributors Have Hard Time Accepting Anthony...
Blitzkrieg Opp: Graham Platner Wins Democrat Senate Primary and Credits ‘Love and Redempti...
Member of Parliament Says No Good Will Come From Sharing Video of Attempted...
Roseanne Barr Not Impressed With Rolling Stone's Wrap-Up Smear Against Spencer Pratt
Inclusionmaxxing So Hard You Invent the Muslim Lesbian Power Couple
Daily Beast: 'CBS News Veteran' Shreds ‘Brazen MAGA Slant’ of 60 Minutes
'THIS IS A WAR': Here Are More Reactions to the Karmelo Anthony Murder...
‘Our Tea Party Is Here’: The Left is Standing By Their Nazi-Tattooed, Adultery-Plagued...
MeToo Who? AOC: Abuse Allegations Against Democrat Are 'Hard to Stomach'... But We'll...
Irish Politicians Respond to Immigrant Stabbing Incident, You Wont Believe What They're Co...
LIVE ELECTION RESULTS: Primary Night in Maine, Nevada, North Dakota, and South Carolina
Tom Steyer: Billionaire Democrat Proves You Really Can Buy Everything Except Votes
Trump Watches Basketball Like a Normal Human, Jonah Goldberg Has a Full-On Nervous...
‘FAFO, Donald’: Gavin Newsom Signs Law Imprisoning Politicians Who Spread Election Lies
Karmelo Anthony Supporter Rages, Wants to Know What to Tell Her Five Boys

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement