Berlin Pride Attack: Known Islamist Abdul Ballout Killed by Police After Leaving 1...
Just Released: While USA Buried Its Dead, Fauci’s COVID Diary Celebrated His ‘Explosive’...
Bombshell on Fox News: Deranged DSA Leader Drops Mask — 'Yes, We Want...
Two GOP Senators Urge No Recess
GOOD! Families of 9/11 Victims Want Mayor Zohran Mamdani BANNED From 25th Anniversary
Dem Sen. Chris Van Hollen Assures Michigan Voters That El-Sayed Will Protect Criminal...
Hakeem Jeffries Reaches Stage Two of Democrat Denial Regarding New Jersey Election Fraud
'You're Late to the MAGA Party!' Dems AGAIN Try to Rip Off (and...
Maximum Overdrive: NBC News Once Again Reports About the Violent Rage of Self-Driving...
People Mag Slams Trump's Transphobic Joke About Kaitlan Collins (and Everyone Has the...
Journo Tells Rupert Lowe a Lot of People Could Interpret 'Anglo-Saxon' as White...
Convicted Murderer Karmelo Anthony Seeks a New Trial, Claims Judge Was Biased
Judges Enter Orders Preventing DHS From Terminating TPS for Ethiopia, South Sudan
Landlords Ban Work-from-Home Tenants: Because Using the Place You Rent Is Apparently Too...
NYT's Maggie Haberman Reports Trump Has Massively Escalated Against the Smithsonian

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement