Here Are Details About the Arrested 'Father' This NM Dem Didn't Mention While...
Taylor Lorenz: Queen of Cancel Culture & Leopards Eating Faces Party Founder Discovers...
Lunatic District Attorney Vows to 'Blow Up' White House Ballroom
Dana Loesch’s Bold Fix: Stuff Near-80 Icons in Giant Koozies Before We Lose...
Chris Murphy Finally Remembers the State He's Supposed to Represent (Just Not the...
Mike Rogers Nukes Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From yet ANOTHER Issue
Can't Help but Notice What Abdul El-Sayed Does NOT Do When Responding to...
Dem Rep. Debbie Dingell Tells Wolf Blitzer She's Tired of People Asking Her...
Sean Parnell Makes a Pledge to Gold Star Families on the Fifth Anniversary...
Hillary Clinton Welcomes Dem 'Experiment' to See If Unhinged Socialists Can Help Win...
DEM-Olition Man: Philly DA Larry Krasner Wants to Blow Up the White House...
Victor Davis Hanson: Schumer and Jeffries Lost Control of Dem Party, Talarico Makes...
Jessica Tarlov: Abdul El-Sayed ‘Seemed Like a Bro’ From U of M, Not...
ABC News Interviews Alex Pretti’s Grieving Family, Who Want Accountability
Variety Thinks Rosie O'Donnell Should Shatter Comedy's Glass Ceiling With Her Own Show

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement