Southern Specters: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Says the ‘Ghosts of the Confederacy’ Are Haunting...
Dems Angry at Trump for Calling Out ‘Journos’ for Dumb Questions, Biden Also...
Immigration Council Fellow: Those Margaritas Were Placed Before Sen. Van Hollen ‘With No...
Museum Exhibit Has AWFLs Put in Shackles by a Black Man Who Welcomes...
RATIO! TMZ Poll Asking About Spencer Pratt's Possibly Misleading Campaign Ad Is NOT...
Law Prof: Trying to Spin the Russia Probe Into a Grand Conspiracy Is...
George Conway Just Said the Quiet Part Out Loud: Dems Have No Policies...
Karen Bass Worried She’s Being ‘Demonized’ in Spencer Pratt’s Violent and Hateful Ads
Obama Bros (Looking at Jon Favreau) in Meltdown: Big Names Line Up Behind...
TMZ Exclusive: Spencer Pratt Is Staying at a Hotel, Not Living in a...
Report: CA Spent Nearly $189 Million to Give Every State Prisoner an iPad
The AI Revolution No One Wants to Celebrate: Lessons from UCF Graduation
Pete Buttigieg and Penn. Dem Candidate Get Authenticity Coaching While Shooting Campaign V...
Sen. Patty Murray Asks Lee Zeldin If He Seriously Believes ’There Is Abortion...
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Protests Too Much, Posts His Alcohol Use Disorders Self-Test...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement