TMZ Poll Asking If Spencer Pratt's Ad Is Misleading Comes to an End...
ARGLE RAR! Jonathan Turley Calls Shady AF Marc Elias Out for Being a...
That Lee Zeldin Kept from LAUGHING After Patty Murray Asked Him This Abortion...
Newsom Gets Caught as His Career Comes to a Close
AWFUL: Fairfax County DA Steve Descano Forced to Admit He Reduced Sentence for...
Eye Roll of the Day: Politico Reports Dems Are Prepared to 'Ditch the...
Kamala Harris Wants Dems to Hold a 'No Bad Ideas' Brainstorm Session (Here's...
CNN (!) DROPS Dimbulb AG Jay Jones for Ranting About Politics Instead of...
Supporters GASPED! Fairfax Co DA Steve Descano's Terrible, No-Good Congressional Testimony...
HA! Never Seen Her Make THAT Face Before: Ana Navarro Flames OUT After...
VA Democrats Who Ran for Now Nonexistent Lobster District Have a Whole Lot...
Ex NYC Mayor Eric Adams Interrupts the Mamdani Budget Celebration and Demonization of...
Schadenfreude-a-PALOOZA! Abigail Spanberger VETOS Collective Bargaining and HOOBOY, Their...
TOO Perfect! Group That Leaked Pete Buttigieg's Authenticity Coaching Video Just Made Thin...
Gavin Newsom's Attempted Mockery of Trump's Reflecting Pool Project Quickly Derailed and B...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos