When Will Woke Media Scolds Realize That Hockey Players Are Made Different?
When ‘Reporting’ Sounds Like a Pep Rally: ABC’s Trevor Ault and the Gun-Toting...
A Monster of His Own Making: After Walz Talked to Trump Protesters Swarm...
From London to Miami? Nah — Giles Coren Says US Too Risky, Gets...
Compassion Without Discernment: Why Women Are Falling for Leftist Propaganda Again
Cam Higby Infiltrates ANTI-ICE Group Chats. I Break Down What He Found and...
WHOA: Even the Biden Admin Thought Something Was Shady About Ilhan Omar and...
LFG! Make 'Em FAMOUS! Tom Homan Puts Fear of GOD Into Signal Chat...
Well, Well, WELL! Another DAMNING Nugget Just Dropped About Alex Pretti and Folks,...
Fox News Panel Erupts As Jessica Tarlov Spews Anti-ICE Lies: Liberal Media Panics
A-Hole Whose Immigration Policies Are Responsible for What's Happening in MN Chimes in
Brave, Tough-Guy MN Antifa Captain Says He Won't Run BUT Then YEETS Right...
SHOCKER! Could Be MORE to Nurse Alex Pretti's Story That the Left Does...
HA! JD Vance Shuts Ilhan Omar Down By 'Interpreting' What She REALLY Means...
PSYCHO VCU Healthcare Worker Scrubs TikTok After Her How-To Paralyze ICE Agents Video...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement