Tattoo Breakthrough: Elizabeth Warren Gives Graham Platner’s Nazi Ink a Pass, Endorses Him...
Vox Profiles the ‘Ragebait Candidate’ to Whom Young GOP Voters Are Paying Attention
Dem Mazie Hirono Claims Illegal Aliens Won’t Break Our Election Laws Because They...
CNN’s Brian Stelter to Lead Ole Miss Panel on How Media Can Regain...
Criminal Migrant in UK Beats Deportation, Arguing His Son Can’t Tolerate Foreign Chicken...
Zohran Mamdani Furious That Judge Has Ordered Deportation of City Council Employee
Minneapolis Mayor Runs Through the City in New Tourism Video Following ICE Surge
No Roses for Taylor: Bachelorette Season Starring Mormon Wives Star Taylor Frankie Paul...
NBC News: 'Experts Say' Killing of Iranian Leader Doesn't Mean Israel Is Winning...
Pittsburgh Schools: Sorry Kids, No In-Person School—The NFL Needs Roads Clear for Their...
Two Women Face Prison Time for Stalking an ICE Agent They Followed Home
Chuck Norris Hospitalized? Nah, Hawaii Had a Chuck Norris Emergency – The Internet's...
CBS News Still Reports That ICE 'Arrested' a 5-Year-Old; Family's Asylum Claim Denied
NASCAR Driver Required to Undergo Sensitivity Training After Speaking in a Tone ‘Mocking...
The Left Hates You, Moms: New York Magazine Encourages Non-Monogamy for Mothers

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement