Judge Sides With Rioters, Says Safety Fence Around Federal Building Tramples Their Free...
LIVE Election Results With TWITCHY! Primary Night in New York, Maryland, and South...
SCOTUS: Rastafarian Can’t Sue Prison Guards for Shaving His Dreadlocks (Scott Wiener Whine...
SCOTUS: Green Card Holders Can Be Stripped of Legal Status If They Have...
Whoopi Goldberg Trapped: New Karmelo Anthony Footage Causes Big Problems for 'The View'
Judge BLOCKS Trump Administration From Restricting SNAP Benefits for Soda and Candy
Come On, Baby, Take a Ride With Me... In My Taxpayer-Funded NYPD SUV:...
Mamdani-Backed Oct. 7 Cheerleader Vying for NY-13 Seat — Gets Rightfully Grilled Over...
WITCH-With-a-B Tara Palmeri Airs Pro-Life Rep's Ectopic Pregnancy Even After She Begged He...
Oh, HONEY: Jemele Hill Pulls a Lotta STUPID Out of Her Arse Blaming...
YIKES! LEAKED Audio of James Talarico Admitting He HATES Christianity Should END His...
John C. Reilly Thinks the Right Lacks Empathy — Bless His Heart
NOT an Airport: Dana Loesch Had the PERFECT Response to Tucker Carlson Taking...
Pick a SIDE, Idiots! Boy Howdy, Did the MLB Botch the Whole Pride...
Mehdi Hasan Thought It Was Smart to Pick a Fight With Brandon Gill...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement