Moob Swings: Man-Breasted Democrat George Conway Laughably Claims Trump Has Low Testostero...
Law Prof Butthurt That Trump Fired New US Attorney an Hour After He...
Body Discovered Inside Ayanna Pressley’s Million-Dollar House Owned by Her Ex-Con Husband
Immigration Officials Allowed to Consider Use of Benefits When Granting Permanent Legal St...
How the Tables Turn: Andrew & Tristan Tate Busted in Miami Right Before...
Mehdi Hasan Triggered by Marco Rubio's Speech on Far-Left Violence
The AP Tracks Down Ex-Wife of ICE Agent in Its Video of 'What...
Jesse Kelly Was Right: Europeans Visit America for the World Cup and Realize...
'Abolish Rent' Author Says Rent Is Paid ‘At the Barrel of a Gun’...
JJ Watt Proves He’s the GOAT: Turns a Fan’s ‘What If’ into Beers...
Boston Globe: Woman Came to Boston for Noah Kahan Concert and Now She's...
Mamdani Holding 'Active Conversation' on Legality of Arresting Netanyahu at the UN This...
Canadian Fire Chief Opens Wildfire Update With a Land Acknowledgement, Coughing Americans...
Election Integrity Explained by (Checks Notes) Olive Garden
Marco Rubio Delivers a Blistering Speech Against Communism and Far-Left Political Violence

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement