Texas Court Swears in Witness 'in the Name of Allah,' Igniting Fury Over...
'Once He Knew the Source, Fetterman Ate Him Alive' — Senator Shut Down...
Jessica Tarlov Says Dems Need More Troy Jackson-Style Anonymous Account Trolling Energy (R...
A Gentle Reminder: The Science Writer Who Labeled COVID Lab Leak Racist Still...
Eagles Defensive Coordinator Mocks Dr. Fauci to Escape a Reporter's Question
Yikes: Official WNBA Account Posts Players Betting on Itselves, Then Scrubs the Evidence
Look at This Insane Video From Spain for a Reminder of What Dem/DSA...
Detroit Rev. Picks Stevens Because El-Sayed Won’t Shut Up About Gaza Long Enough...
'Made Me Sick': Ex DNI Tulsi Gabbard Reminds Everyone Why Dr. Fauci Took...
'Jail Won’t Fix His Heart': NYU Student Defends Letting Rapists, Including Her Own,...
Fetterman Tells Bernie to Sit This One Out; Sanders Fires Back, Questions Whether...
Basement Hermit Michael Tracey Shocked That People Whose Lives Were Ruined Still Care...
Sen. Eric Schmitt Digs Up a Fauci-Related Flashback From NPR to Let Them...
Joyce Carol Oates Calls Criticism of Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ the 'Crude Language of...
The Atlantic Says the Fauci Hearing Was Full of 'Unchallenged Allegations' (Yeah, About...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement