World’s Loudest Anti-Semite Ilhan Omar Demands Senate Hopeful Haley Stevens Bend the Knee...
Maine Dem Party Vice Chair's Example of 'Grassroots Democracy in Action' Is a...
Maine Democrats' Clown Car Continues: Favorite Troy Jackson May Not Be Eligible to...
Intrepid Resistance Journo and Reflecting Pool Reporter Jim Acosta Wanted Press to Walk...
REALLY!? CNN PR Defends Their 'Honest, Accurate Journalism' After Being Roasted by Trump
Newsom Press Office Self-Owns After Trump's Spot-On Joke About the Governor's 'Leadership'
MS NOW Host Covering WHCA Says Trump Had to ‘Convince’ Americans to Distrust...
WHCA Dinner With Whine: CNN’s Brian Stelter Blames Trump for Damaging Public’s Trust...
Ben Shapiro Schools Piers Morgan: Free Speech Means I Don't Have to Feed...
Real Christian Care Is Personal—Not Political Force
Obama Fanboy Axelrod Deletes Outrage Post After Falling for Fake Trump Gold Coin...
Cecilia Vega Mad She Got Fired for Defying CBS Bosses and Whined About...
From Cocky Troll to Sudden Sage: Katz Rewrites Himself From Platner’s Hype Man...
Whitmer Endorses Haley Stevens in MI Senate Primary ... Hamas Caucus Hardest Hit
Hamas Caucus of the Dem Party Melts Down as DNC Crowns South Carolina...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos