TMZ’s Harvey Levin Calls Fauci Attacks ‘Heartbreaking,’ McCarthy-Like
David Axelrod Races to Defend Fauci After He Pleads the Fifth on Everything—Even...
Dem Sen. Andy Kim Feting Dr. Fauci Was a Deranged Political Version of...
Bulwark's Correspondent Confirms MS NOW's Theory That Fauci Hearing Was a Show Trial
Gov. Andy Beshear Pulls the 'Poor Old Man' Card on Anthony Fauci, Scolds...
RATIO Alert! Dick Durbin Gets DRAGGED for Trying to Dismiss Fauci's Diaries As...
Equine Embarrassment: Tim Walz Trots Out 'Horse Dewormer' Lie to Stick Up for...
Rental Ram Revealed: Talarico Props Up 'Real Texan' Image With Enterprise Rental Truck
'They're Still Doing This!' CBS News Medical Expert Attempts Major Fauci Diaries Damage...
All Hell Broke Loose As Fauci 'Testified' Today
Deranged WNBA Owner Berates Teenage Fans Supporting Fair Play for Women
Laura Ingraham Suggests Rand Paul Take a Different Approach in Getting Fauci to...
Mamdani’s Freebie Groceries Spark Lawsuit: Immigrant Owners Warn Bodegas Face Extinction
No Interviews, No Free Palestine Drama: Studios Keep Mark Ruffalo Quiet for Spider-Man...
PolitiFact's Defense of WI Dem Candidate for Gov Is Why So Many 'Fact-Checkers'...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement