Prodigal Elon Musk Returns to Trump White House Family in Time to Help...
War on Media! CNN’s Brian Stelter Fumes Trump Will Hold BBC Accountable for...
Tim Burchett Says Rubio and Hegseth Proved Democrats Went Overboard on Legal Narco-Terrori...
'Target Karen' Tries to Harass Worker Over Charlie Kirk Shirt; the Response Is...
Enemy Entry: Many Ask Why Susan Wiles Gave ‘Journo’ White House Access Knowing...
Adam Kinzinger Posts More Hypotheticals About Sydney Shooting and AR-15s
This Marine's Dream to Open a Cigar Lounge Was Shut Down by Government
So Much THIS! Derek Hunter Asks 2 Questions to HILARIOUSLY Slam Jennifer Welch...
Rep. Jamie Raskin Introducing Legislation to Protect Against White House’s Marie Antoinett...
From the TOP ROPE! Linda McMahon DROPS Tim Walz Over MN 'Ghost Student'...
Brown University Killer Still at Large: Police Investigation Falls Apart
You LOVE to See It! November Jobs Report BURIES Expectations and Lefties Just...
Hold Her BEER, Jay Jones: Virginia Democrat's Daughter Threatens to Poison White MAGA...
Targeted, Ignored, Spun: How the Media Failed a Nation After a Weekend of...
FBI Handing Over 'BOMBSHELL' Memos to Congress About Biden's Mar-A-Lago Raid That Could...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos