Texas Loser John Cornyn Tries to Insult Scott Presler and, Yeah, THAT Didn't...
And Then There’s Fraud: Jeffries Says California’s Elections Are Secure But Trump Is...
Debt Wish: Dem Ayanna Pressley Wants Reparations and MAGA Is Begging Her to...
Scott Jennings Reminds Karen Finney She Worked for Bill Clinton During Her ‘Character...
UK Politician Claims Elon Musk Orchestrated the Riot in Belfast After Beheading Attempt
Boston Police Searching for Suspects in Armed Robbery of Lemonade Stand
Former Court Clerks Arrested for Allegedly Helping Illegals Evade ICE
Thank You, European Soccer Fans, for Reminding Us How Great America Actually Is
Professor Blames Austin Metcalf’s Father for Not Teaching His Son ‘Black Boys Have...
ABC News Show Riot Damage After Asylum Seeker ‘Allegedly Attacked Another Person With...
NBC News: Burning Cross in Chicago Park Shocks Residents; January 6 Connection?
Ryan Grim: Republicans Looked Silly When ‘Nazi Tattoo’ Turned Out Not to Be...
What Stuck Out to Karmelo Anthony’s Father Was the ‘All-White Jury’
World Cup Tourists Find Surreal Sporting Goods Store With a Firing Range; Also...
Gavin Newsom's 'Donald Trump's Dream' Video Melts All Remaining Projection Detectors

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement