Let Us All Join Brian Stelter In Mourning Over One Less Hour of...
Minnesota Fraud Defendant 'On the Run' After Jumping From Fourth Story Balcony to...
Majority Leader John Thune Announces Senate Will Go Home Until June
Sean Davis, Julie Kelly and Others Nuke Reuters' Post on 'Alleged Mishandling' of...
Douche-y VA Democrat Dan Helmer Openly Threatens SCOVA Justice Over Gerrymandering Ruling
Try Not to Get Whiplash From MS NOW's Ken Dilanian Doing a Fast...
May the Odds Be Ever in Your Favor: Zohran Mamdani's Socialist Hunger Games...
Another RINO Got Crushed
You Can See the Actual Moment Hillary Clinton Swallows a Soul While Giving...
Fraud Leader Rats Out Ilhan Omar Over 50-Year Sentence
DNC's 2024 Postmortem Report Is Nearly 200 Pages and Not a Single Mention...
WELP, Here's the DNC Autopsy and WOW... We KNEW It Would be Bad...
MN Daycare Owner Nick Shirley Investigated Has Been Charged With Fraud (Remember Who...
*POPCORN* WATCH Candace Owens MELT DOWN After Getting Fact-NUKED by Guest Who Brought...
Reporter Asked Jeffries, Schumer and Warren About Platner's Deleted Posts and Guess What...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement