LOL! Scott Jennings Bringing Up Past Debate to EMBARRASS Neera Tanden Because He...
HA! Mike Lee Has ALL THE FUN Tormenting Ruben Gallego Over Platner Endorsement...
Midtown Manhattan Skyscraper On Verge of Collapse --> Huge Emergency Response, Evacuations...
Clickbait RAG The Daily Beast Runs Sleazy Hit Piece Claiming Brandon Gill Hid...
Wait ... WUT?! Graham Platner Campaign Is Hiring and the Role They're Hiring...
Lyndsey Fifield Goes STRAIGHT-FIRE on NYT: Couldn't Corroborate Platner Abuse Claims? BS!...
Aww, Commies Can't DEAL! Hasan Piker FLIPS OUT in ALL-CAPS on Scott Jennings...
Dems Have a Violent MAN Problem: Looks Like Maine Dems 1st Choice to...
Well, WHAT Do You Know?! Biden Really DID Hose Housing ... By Letting...
DataRepublican Torches Candace Owens With HER OWN WORDS in Detailed, Damning, MUST-READ Th...
Desperation: Stephen King Shows X His 'Dark Half' In a BIZARRE Defense of...
Heavy Vetting: Scott Jennings Says Dems Scrutinized Graham Platner’s Past But Signed Off...
Racist Race: Jasmine Crockett Still Angry with Dem Party for Backing and Electing...
MS NOW’s Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow Say They Knew All Along That...
Young Washington Beats Supergirl at the Box Office Over the Holiday Weekend; Excuses...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos