Bill Clinton's America 250 Statement Tries Hard to Keep Up With Zohran Mamdani...
Ron DeSantis Has a Couple GREAT Questions After Zohran Mamdani's Airing of Grievances...
‘Independence Day 1776’: Revolutionary AI Short Reveals the ‘True Story’ of America’s Brea...
Barely Living Room: Zohran Mamdani Lectures America Flanked by a Joyless, Captured, Catato...
Ro Khanna Says Elizabeth Warren’s Ultra-Millionaire Tax is the Ultra-Moral Way to Cancel...
Twitchy Celebrates America 250
Patti LuPone ‘Furious’ After Gay Cruise She’s On Gets Banned From Turkey for...
Radical Reveal: Colorado DSA Candidate Shares Secret Socialist Solution to All of America’...
Rand Paul Calls Out Sketchy Birth Tourism Loophole — BIG Dummy Kinzinger Responds...
As Backward as His Ideas: Zohran Mamdani Lectures America from the Wrong Side...
Taylor & Travis’ Lavish Wedding: Road Closures, Millions to Charity and a Masterclass...
Bill Maher Tells JD Vance He'd Need Subpoena Power in Order to Get...
Ratio-Palooza! Journo Says Military Jets Flying Over DC for America 250 Makes it...
Zohran Lights Up the Sky: Fans Praise Him for 'FREE' Macy’s Fireworks Show...
Ben Ferguson Pointed Out CNN Wasn't Complying With Mamdani's A/C Rule and the...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos