Stubborn As a Hogg: Ex-DNC Vice Chair Says Graham Platner Should Go Away...
MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Misses ‘Excellent Journalism’ From Her Tenure As Biden’s Press...
Retired Border Patrol Commander-At-Large Greg Bovino: 'Notice the Entitlement'
'I Have Somewhere to Be, Man': Enjoy This Video of an Ultra-Karen Getting...
NYT's Nicholas 'Dog-Rape' Kristof Doesn't Take Anything at Face Value
Abortion Doctor Admits Elective Late-Term Abortions Happen 'All the Time'
CNN’s Erin Burnett Looks Into 'Multiple' Sailors Trying to Go Overboard on the...
Alyssa Farah Griffin Wants Campus Protests for Afghan Girls but Skips It on...
Arrested SPLC Official Says White Supremacy Is One of the Worst Things Created...
Atlantic Contributor Suggests the Republican Equivalent of Woke 1.0
Trump Weighing Kari Lake, Scott Jennings, and Spencer Pratt As Possible Replacements for...
Adam Kinzinger Says ICE Using Non-Lethal Shock Gloves Feels a Bit Communist
Electrifying News! DHS Plans to Equip ICE Agents With Non-Lethal Shock Gloves
Transphobic ‘Comedian’ Tells NBA Stars to Chemically Transition or STFU
Scott Jennings Hilariously DROPS Abdul El-Sayed and His 'Football Challenge' With a Single...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement