Evita Duffy-Alfonso Embodies What Real Family Looks Like — And the Left Can’t...
Mehdi Hasan Goes Full Fangirl: ‘Hard to Put Into Words’ as Mayor Mamdani...
Mamdani Stans Insist Rent Freeze Good: Landlords Will Provide Services With Monopoly Money...
Michigan Dem Abdul El-Sayed Receives Special Delivery from Blue — Contents: Absolutely No...
Jesus Was Jewish, You Copium Addicts: The Anti-Semitic Denial That (Much Like Jesus)...
Can Adam Schiff Please Give an Update About This Indictment He Said Was...
GILLIFIED! Rep. Brandon Gill Puts on an Absolute Clinic as He WIPES THE...
Americans Are Kind… But Kurt Schlichter Says We’re Not Brain-Dead Enough for the...
MADNESS That They Had to Litigate THIS: Dems Will Do Anything to Keep...
Tales of Woe Debunked: Melugin Drops Truth — Haitian 'Refugees' Were Already Living...
Trump Is Making Mamdani Regret Ever Starting This War
People at Obama's Presidential Library Asked to Name His Greatest Accomplishment and LOL...
Dan Bongino Waxing POETIC About Just How MUCH Democrats Hate America Is a...
Compare Gavin Newsom's Call for a Massive New Tax to a California 'Fact'...
Her FACE! Scott Jennings Gives MASTER CLASS on GOP Whooping Dems and Kaitlan...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement