Schumer Loses Control As Abdul El-Sayed's Victory Deconstructs the Democrat Party
Elizabeth Warren Does a Rake Stomp While Complaining About 'Landlords Jacking Up the...
Amy Klobuchar Gets Absolutely Booed Off Stage for Border & Cop Lies —...
Jumpin' for Jihad: Chris Murphy Is 'All In' for Fake Doctor and Terrorist...
Tim Walz Might Want to Thank Fellow 'Manly Man' James Talarico for Eclipsing...
Mighty Big Threats From a Small Man: El-Sayed Warns Mike Rogers He Has...
NRSC Dares to Use Dem Candidate’s Actual Legal Name; Bulwark Writer Declares It...
NRSC Already Has an Ad Out About Abdul El-Sayed and It's BRUTAL (There...
'Stop Talking': Advice for Francesca Hong Reminiscent of Kamala Campaign
Hasan Piker Goes Nuclear After El-Sayed’s MI Primary Win: Calls Foes 'Islamophobic Pieces...
Mamdani Tries to Do a One-Eighty After Proof of Residency to Shop Comment...
BOOM! Hawaii Dem Congressional Candidate Gets an Instant FAFO With One Punch (and...
Outkick’s Clay Travis Challenges WNBA Team to Play HS Boys’ Basketball Team for...
The GOP Must Focus on the Cost of Living
Dem Pete Buttigieg Proposes ‘Normal’ Things Like Ending the Electoral College and Altering...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement