Jasmine Crockett: Trump Wants to Target 'Anybody Who Has a Little Bit of...
Pelosi: Trump's Statements About Ilhan Omar 'Reflect a Disturbing Lack of Understanding of...
Shocked in 2021, Still Shocked in 2026: Hospitals Haven't Changed, and Recent Insane...
Cornel West Explains on CNN What It Means to ‘N****rize’ a Whole Country
FAKE, FAKE, FAKE! Ilhan Omar LOSES It When Asked Why She Didn't Follow...
Nurse Who Said He'd Deny Conservatives Anesthesia During Surgery Loses License
Man Impersonates FBI Agent, Says He Has a Court Order (and Pizza Cutter)...
‘Batman’ Demands Santa Clara City Council Find a Spine and Do Something About...
Anti-Ice Activists Surround Restaurant After Mistaking TSA Officers for Federal Agents
MN Commissioner Begs for Eviction Ban So Illegals Can Hide from ICE and...
Return to Sender: Gavin Newsom Pledges 'Aid' To Tennessee But There's Just One...
'Free Is a LIE': Zohran Mamdani's Tone on FREE STUFF Has Magically Changed...
Stand With ICE
Jeffries: 'Put Noem on Ice Permanently' — Insists It’s a Polite Firing Request,...
Woman Who Doxxed ICE Director and His FAMILY Just Found OUT by Losing...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement