'Hillary for Prison': Jon Stewart Discovers the World Outside NYC and Is Bewildered...
NM Dem Nominee Haaland Slams ICE for Removing Illegal 'Dad' Charged With Sickening...
American Heroes of 9/11: Patricia Horoho
Captain Conman: El-Sayed Can’t Decide If Peers Blamed Him for 9/11—or Made Him...
24 States Now Suing Trump Administration for Securing Elections ... Guess What They...
Mehdi Hasan Flips Out on Dana Bash for Telling the TRUTH About Hasan...
Mexican Illegal Thought It Was a Good Idea to Try to Interfere With...
Los Angeles Socialist Nithya Raman Brags About Getting Crosswalk Done, There's Just ONE...
Scott Jennings Makes Rep. Debbie Dingell Crushing on Hasan Piker Look Even WORSE...
Small Businesses Are Quietly Doing Something Nobody Notices
AWW! No Fair! Reason Why North Hampton Yacht Elites Can't Party Anymore Is...
NYC Immigrant Grocers Are Now Officially Living in the JOY That IS Socialism
Wells Fargo Exec Liked Death Threat on Corey DeAngelis' Family Pic — NOW...
Ro Khanna Tries TRASHING Former Bernie Sanders Jewish Staffer, THEN the Staffer Shows...
Sleep TIGHT, Virginia! Fairfax County Stings 9 Child Predators BUT This Is Steve...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement