Nancy Pelosi Wants to Make It Clear She Was NOT in Congress for...
Stephen Miller TORCHES Obama Hack Jon Favreau in BRUTAL Smackdown About Dems Putting...
Hoppin' Mad Joe Walsh Croaks Out Demented Rant to Tiny Gathering of Freaky...
Legacy Media’s ‘Moderate’ Democrat Andy Beshear Won’t Say He’ll Put Americans Before Illeg...
CNN Talks to Slurmit the Frog of the Portland Frog Brigade
Robert De Niro Says He Chokes on the Phrase, ‘We All Love Our...
Rashida Tlaib Advises Americans to Keep Their Children Away From Sicko Pedophile Trump
Touching Grass Wins: USA Hockey Gold Brings Back 1980 Magic, Inspires and Reminds...
Judge Rules Trump Admin Can’t Deport Illegals to Third-Party Countries
Monica Crowley Had a Front Row Seat for Dems' Reaction During Trump's SOTU...
Jessica Valenti Had to Write Something About the US Men's Team Locker Room...
Mullin to Bernie Sanders: 'What Have You Been Doing Your Whole Life?' —...
Ilhan's Latest Stunt Backfires – Her ICE-Harassing Guest Arrested After Defying Police at...
Jen Psaki Criticizes the ‘Gross, Violent Pornography’ Part of the SOTU and the...
'Security Called the Cops on Us'! Looks Like Jim Acosta Is Trying to...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos