Attorney General Candidate Explains How He’s Going to Kill Donald Trump
Duckworth Bites Off More Than She Can Chew: Rubio Schools Interrupting Senator in...
Video Reportedly Shows Alex Pretti Doing Everything But 'Legally Observing'
Katie Pavlich Calls AP Post on Citizen Shot by Border Patrol ‘Outrageously Misleading’
Molly Ringwald to GOP: You'll Be Tried as Nazi Collaborators – Pretty in...
Liberal Alerts Us to Nationwide General Strike on Friday, Like Last Friday's
Nurse Who Called for Paralyzing and Poisoning ICE Agents Sent Packing
Podcaster Armand Domalewski Steps on ANOTHER Giant Rake With Failed 'Both Sides' Meme
Ilhan Omar’s Reaction to Being Sprayed With Unknown Substance Compared to Trump’s Shooting...
From 'Kidnapped by ICE' to Handcuffs: Bananas & Rice Lady Nasra Ahmed ARRESTED...
FAFO ... Fl Drops the Hammer: Surgeon General Ladapo REVOKES Nursing License After...
CNN Panel Erupts Into Chaos: Rep. Ilhan Omar 'Sprayed' by Suspicious Liquid
Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez: The Democrat Who Actually Ran a Business... Selling Crappy Weed...
Oh, Honey, NO: Tim Walz Now Claims He Would 'Beat the S***' Out...
We Did Nazi That Coming: Larry Krasner Dons His Jackboots and Promises to...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement