Converse-Troversy! Washington Post Tries to 'Sneak' in Some Race Rage Over Shoe Ad
Remember When Brian Stelter Asked If Fox News Should Lose WH Access and...
'It's Two Letters': Scott Presler Hauls Out a Kamala Classic As the Debate...
Self-Proclaimed 'Cis Gender Woman' Tells J.K. Rowling She Can't CHOOSE Who's a Woman...
Video Compilations End CNN's Screeching About the WH Ban and 'Fair and Accurate...
She's Still GOING: Sue O'Connell Straight-Up UNHINGED, Continues Picking Fights With X Ove...
Nancy Mace SO Emasculated Mehdi Hasan That He Went AFTER Her on X...
Seattle Mayor Hopes an Executive Order and Blaming GOP Will Save Her Crumbling...
Yup, She Can STILL Make 'Em Cry: Sarah Huckabee Sanders SHUTS Journo Whining...
WH Drops a BRUTAL Reality MOAB After CNN Defends Their 'Fair and Accurate...
It's 'Orangeland' Now: President Trump Announces PERMANENT Greenland Security Deal
Napoleonic Syndrome: Stepstool Abdul Challenges Vance to a Beard Inspection and Weightlift...
DeSantis Is Enforcing the Law, but Rep. Salazar Is Selling Amnesty With a...
Here's Another Gem of an Illegal Biden Let Into the U.S. (Bill Melugin...
Fairfax County Atty.'s Pledge to Prosecute Those Who Threaten Public Safety Is a...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos