These 'Republican Moms' Are All Voting for James Talarico: 'I Find Him to...
Francesca Hong Notes Her Proximity to Whiteness Continues Through Her Half-White Son
Jezebel: ‘MAGA Barbie’ Sophie Cunningham Working to Be WNBA’s Worst Player
LIVE Election Results on Twitchy: Primary Night in MI, MO, VA, KS, and...
A Very Masculine James Talarico Wields a 'Blowtorch'
Rage Return?: Politico ‘Journo’ Declared COVID Damage Repaired Until Fauci Forced to Testi...
Drama Queen Gavin Newsom Declares Congress Dead, Democracy Over If Dems Don't Win
Bring in the Bulldozers: Madison and State Police Dismantle Black Lives Matter Encampment
Mamdani Gets Caught As Grocery ID Policy Backfires
Welcome to the Party, Pal: Mark Halperin Suddenly Notices a TEENY Bit of...
This Alone, This Right Here Should Be Disqualifying for Francesca Hong... Sadly, Commies...
Ok, HAMAS: Ben Rhodes Shrieks About AIPAC (the Jews!) in Thread Pushing Abdul...
BOOMITY: Mike Rowe Responds to ENRAGED Crazies Who FREAKED Over His EPIC Post...
Max Miller REALLY Stepped in It When He Released Those DropBox Files to...
Self-Proclaimed Socialist's Reddit Post Shows How Much the DSA Actually DESPISES the Worki...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement