Scott Bessent Can't Help but LAUGH As CNBC Journo Tries Arguing With Him...
THIS! Seb Gorka Unloads on Jake Tapper and Other Media Peeps Explaining WHY...
CNN's Been Kicked Out of the WH but Still Knows Exactly What's Going...
WH Media Defense of Their 'Reporting' Is Laughable (Look at All This Anti-Trump...
JD Vance Breaks Out the Puppets and Crayons Explaining Trump's 'Ban' to Fussy...
This One's for YOU! Lauren Boebert Gives Media the Proverbial Middle Finger in...
CNN, MS NOW and POLITICO Join Forces to Sue Trump and Their Statement...
He's Dead, Jim. DEAD! Brandon Gill Ends Hasan Piker in BRUTAL Clash When...
CNN Legal Analyst Explains When Mortgage Fraud Is and Isn't a Victimless Crime...
Death Panels Were Never a Conspiracy: Canada’s 'Care' Offered Suicide, America Offered a...
'DoorDash Hires Illegals?' X DOG-WALKS Woman Claiming She's Representing Illegal ICE Shot...
James Woods Flashes Back to the Moment CNN Lost Its Last Shred of...
1619 Writer Nikole Hannah-Jones Just Learned the Hard Way That WOKE SUCKS and...
Wrong Talking Points, Spartacus: Sen. Cory Booker Calls Abdul El-Sayed a 'Fringe' Figure
Monday Morning Meme Madness

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement