Motive Revealed: FBI Busts White House UFC Attackers
PBS Board Chair Who Wished for Trump to Suffer a Stroke Just Did...
Their FACES! HA! Joint Obama Portrait Unveiled at His Presidential Library and It...
GRRL, BYE: JD Vance Shuts Whoopi Goldberg DOWN for Claiming Trump Is Casting...
Hate Bargatze: The Daily Beast Leads Two Minutes Hate for Nate Bargatze's White...
NEW: Details Released of One of the Alleged Organizers of UFC White House...
Rachel Bitecofer Tries to Give 'The Left' Credit for Building America’s Middle Class...
Greg Gutfeld SHREDS Jessica Tarlov for Scolding Trump After UFC Fighter Calls Michelle...
Justine Bateman UNLOADS on Gavin Newsom As a California Taxpayer With DAMNING Laundry...
Can't EVEN Make This UP! LOL! SPLC Boss Had a Neo-Nazi Lover ......
Jennifer Van Laar Goes Straight-Up FAFO and Breaks Out a MAJOR Receipt...
Scott Jennings Reacts to Ana Navarro’s R-Rated Rant About Robert De Niro and...
Out to Lynch: ‘Historian’ Heather Cox Richardson Tells Jim Acosta UFC ‘Impulse’ Tied...
Miles Off: ‘Anonymous’ Writer Says UFC Freedom 250 Event Was Humiliating Image of...
Phallus in Chains: The View’s Sunny Hostin Says Claims Michelle Obama Is a...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos