Libs of TikTok Presents One of the Worst Cases of TDS She's Ever...
Boise, Banned From Flying Pride Flag at City Hall, Wraps Flagpoles in Pride...
Pentagon Takes Down Photo of Sailor Wearing ‘Save the Big Booty Venezuelans’ Patch
Chicago Teachers Union President Confesses: We Do Politics So Black Women Can Live...
George Conway Cries About Giving His Kids' Inheritance to Biden's Victory Fund
British Nationals Named Ali, Hameed, Ibrahim & Mohammed Busted Illegally Crossing from Can...
Jake Tapper: USC Freshman Loses Eye After Being Shot by Fed at Mostly...
CNN's Melania Hit Job Exposed: Elegant First Lady Pays for Trump Hate, Not...
CNBC: USDA Secretary Sent Easter Email Touting ’Jesus’ and ‘God’, One Staffer Offended
All the President’s Men Turns 50: The Movie That Gave Journalists an Unbearable...
President Trump Being Roasted for 'Dismantling' the US Forest Service
NBC News: Arrests of Illegals Without Criminal Convictions Have Risen Eightfold Under Trum...
Oregon CPS Investigates Parents for Refusing to Transition Their Mentally Ill 15-Year-Old...
Scott Jennings Blisters CNN About the ONE Qualification Anyone Needs to Be 'Credible'...
NYT Melts Down as Trump Finally Fixes Broken Asylum System — Bogus Claims...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement