Guy Wearing DSA Pin Fist-Bumps Woman in ‘Hot Girls for Zohran’ Shirt
Psycho Woman Finds a Way to Paint Lindsay Clancy's Husband As a Suspect...
A Family Benefit That Rewards Marriage, Motherhood, and Citizenship
Lindsay Clancy Defense Attorney ‘So Proud’ of Jury Foreperson for Identifying Holdout Juro...
WaPo: County Coroner Confirms First Infant Death From Measles in Amish County; Shapiro...
WaPo: USS Abraham Lincoln's Stop in Thailand Was Pervaded With a Sense of...
He Did It on Purpose: NYC Mayor Mamdani Hands 9/11 Pen to Al-Qaeda...
Documentary to Examine If Elon Musk Used 'Space Lasers' to Rig the 2024...
VA Dem Party Official Imprisoned for Child Sexual Abuse Material Kept Some High-Profile...
Monster Mash?: Creature Feature Fans React to Godzilla/King Kong Film Hiring ‘Intimacy Coo...
Lay Off of Wajahat Ali, Who Is ‘Just a Small-Time Podcast Host Who...
Team Newsom Would Like Us to Believe Gavin's 'Huge' Crowd in SC Is...
Joy Reid Launches Rehab Tour for Wajahat Ali and Guest Who Called Hakeem...
'Just Perfect'! Guess Where James Talarico Is Taking His 'Grassroots' Campaign to Rake...
Fans Paid a Fortune for Ed Sheeran ... Got Macklemore’s Unsolicited Free Palestine...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement