Texas Rep. Files American Dream and Promise Act to Extend TPS Protections for...
Inside the U.S. Capitol: The Christian Heritage Hidden in Plain Sight
Joe Biden's Ghostwriter Erased the Tapes After He Heard About Robert Hur's Investigation
AARP's John Hishta Reveals the Polling Data That Could Decide the Midterm Elections
CNN’s Kaitlan Collins: ‘It’s Not About Me’ As She Rushes to Jon Stewart’s...
Fauci Complained That HHS Didn’t Let Him Do a CNN Interview ‘Out of...
WI Gov Hopeful Francesca Hong Called to Abolish Senate, Defund Cops & Kill...
Sign on the Fraughted Line: Chicago AWFLs Affix ‘Violence Is Illegal’ Notices on...
Lefty Celebrities Can't Understand the Irony of How They Look When They Call...
Biden Confesses Obama Hated Him on Declassified Tape As Democrat 'Shadow Government' Colla...
9/11 Families to Mamdani: Stay Away — Your Best Pal Hasan Piker Still...
Fauci Knew His Dissenters Were Honest—So of Course He Had YouTube Nuke DeSantis’...
'No Way This Guy Gets Elected': James Talarico Praised 'Islamic Mystics' for Shaping...
Are Americans Really Buying What the Democratic Socialists of America Are Selling?
'Deported US Citizen' Hysteria Dies Screaming: Dude Had Forged Papers and Admitted Sneakin...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement