Dems Frame Their SCOTUS Birthright Citizenship Victory As a Hyper-Partisan Loss, Vow to...
NYC DSA Leader Won’t Condemn Darializa Avila Chevalier’s Post About Wiping Her Dirty...
Third Reich Rugrat: Middle School Yearbook Baby Photo Is Causing a ‘Führer’ in...
Ringleader of Pakistani Grooming Gang Stripped of Citizenship but Can't Be Deported
PA Senators Reach Across the Aisle to Rally Commonwealth for Great American State...
The Amish Clearly Do Not Want to Assimilate Into American Society, Yet the...
The Nation Scolds AOC for Never Apologizing for Covering for the Pro-Genocide Wing...
Axios: GOP Reboots the Red Scare as Young Voters Embrace Socialism
Elon Musk Responds to Nicholas Kristof’s List of Children He’s Killed With Aid...
Gov. Tim Walz: The Supreme Court Says States Can Be Cruel to Trans...
NBC Offers Viewers a 'Trigger Warning' Before Reporting the SCOTUS Ruling on Title...
Anchor Baby Congresswoman Celebrates Birthright Citizenship Ruling by 'Sell-Out Supreme Co...
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Uses … (Wait for It) … TikTok Slang in...
Ro Khanna Is One Wealthy MOFO and Here I Thought Democrats Were the...
TICK TOCK, BRO! Ruben Gallego Has Even MORE 'Splainin' to do About Certain...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement