Nearly 300,000 People Comment on Rule That Would Strip Grant Funding Power Away...
James Talarico Says ‘Fellow Texan’ Who Tried to Run Down ICE Agent Deserves...
Fed-Up 'Trump Supporter' Asks Congressman If There's Any Line in the Sand Where...
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Pleased to Announce New York's Fashionable New Sidewalk Sheds
HIDE THE WOMEN! Zohran Mamdani's Explanation of Why R*pe Is Rising In New...
Toronto Police in ‘Trans SUV’ Post Video of Harassment by Pickup Truck Driver
Yes, Lefties, Red States Are HORRIBLE and You Should Stay Far, FAR Away...
Fairfax County Police Gets Ratioed Into The Sun After Proudly Announcing New Translation...
Bernie Sanders Rake Stomps During His Lecture About Which Side Doesn't 'Believe in...
Brit Lit Twit: Singer Dua Lipa Opens ‘Banned Book’ Library Filled With Easily...
Newsom Embraces Communists, Will Soon Regret It
Only Scott Jennings Could Infuriate Neera Tanden SO MUCH That She Makes This...
'You Make Me SICK, You Rotten Dog': Michael Rapaport Makes Ro Khanna His...
Elissa Slotkin Said the Quiet Part Out Loud While Panicking About What the...
RUH-ROH! DSA Activist's Scolding Thread About Lazy DSA Members Sounds Like Trouble in...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement