Hakeem Jeffries Hoped His Knicks Hat Would Offer Protection From NY Host Calling...
Jonathan Turley's Thread Unravels Hillary Clinton's Utter Contempt for Middle America
Eat Your Wheaties Because You'll Need Your STRENGTH to Adequately Mock These UFC...
Ma'am? LOL! Buzz Patterson Just CLEANED Hillary's Clock Spilling Some Seriously DAMNING Te...
Jim Acosta Has Staked Out the Kennedy Center and Provides Another Gripping Berlin...
Social Media Platform the UK Is Still Allowing Kids Under 16 to Use...
Weather Channel Falls FLAT on Its Trump-Hating FACE After Pushing APOCALYPTIC UFC Freedom...
Super Rich Actor Leads Dems Into a Bold Midterm Strategy of 'I Can't...
THEY MAD: UFC Freedom 250 Fighter 'Goes Off-Script' Going THERE About Michelle Obama...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Soros Silence: Scott Jennings Rebukes Dems on CNN for Focusing on Musk but...
Reid’em and Weep: Ex-MSNBC Host Tells Leftist Crowd That Fired ‘Journos’ Exiled to...
Replace Your Bettes: Dems Enlist Octogenarian Singer to Counter Trump’s UFC Freedom 250...
Platner Platitudes: Dems Jeffries and Warnock Regurgitate ‘Voters’ Decide’ Slop for Maine...
President Trump: Iran Deal is Now Complete

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement