Dude, Where’s My Party?: James Carville and Donny Deutsch Hold Cope Session for...
WNBA Players’ Union Says They Will Not Be Used As Political Pawns, Call...
The WNBA Refuses to Say It’s for Women, Then Punishes the Women Who...
John Pavlovitz Defends Fauci by Reminding Us That Rand Paul Isn’t a Doctor
Lost and Tossed: DSA Co-Chair Serves Up Word Salad When Pushed on ‘Open...
'Cancel Thanksgiving' Francesca Hong Says All Her Opponent Talks About Is Culture Wars
'Get Comfy Being Ruthless,' Says Kamala — Same Party That Already Tried Everything...
Vice President JD Vance on 'Odd' Abdul El-Sayed: 'The Guy's Crazy and Would...
Bad Sign for the Left? Jill Biden Aide Crosses Party Lines to Endorse...
Attorneys General From Three States Subpoena Anthony Fauci
WNBA Commissioner Reacts to Two Male Ex-NBA Players Vying to Join the Women’s...
Hasan Piker Imagines the Complaints If Charlie Kirk Were Stumping for GOP Candidates
Royce White Says She's Getting Hate When She Just Wants to Hoop With...
Terrible Person, Worse Comedian: Mike Rogers Gets the Last Laugh As El-Sayed’s Zinger...
Francesca Hong Will NOT Like Bill Maher's Take on Her Sudden Embrace of...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement