Blinded 'Dare to Struggle' Member Who Rushed Cops Says Doctors Say It's a...
Star Trek Is Now Even Worse Than When Stacey Abrams Guest-Starred as President...
Gov. Tim Walz Assures Us Minnesota Will Remain an 'Island of Decency'
While Walz & Frey Call Protesters 'Protecting Neighbors,' DHS Reveals Criminal Illegals Am...
Saint Paul High School Walkout to Protest ICE Turns Into a Brawl
Say Her Name: Kada Scott Killed After Philly DA Krasner Dropped Charges —...
'Bad Decision'! Ron DeSantis Reminds Anti-ICE Mobs Why Florida Is NOT Tim Walz's...
Emmanuel Macron Says the French Military Is on Its Way to Denmark and...
Nick Shirley Exposes a SHOCKING Cash-Smuggling Scheme at U.S. Airports — Tim Walz is...
NBC News Hacks Get Help Fixing Their Headline About an ICE Shooting in...
Minneapolis Insurrection: Leaders Defy Federal Law – Stephen Miller Warns It's Time to...
Minnesota State Sen. Says Attacking ICE Agents With a Shovel Is Just 'Helping...
Karoline Leavitt Nuked WH Journo Pushing Dem Talking Points About ICE (the Look...
Epic FAIL! Mayor Jacob Frey Heroically Omits KEY Deets in Meltdown Thread About...
Fox News Digs Up Brutal Old CNN Segment They Don't Want You to...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement