WNBA Bombshell: Gorgeous, Hilarious Sophie Cunningham Drops Truth Bomb: No Men in Women's...
'America Deserved It' Streamer Hasan Piker Now Proudly Displays Framed Burning Twin Towers...
Scott Presler Thanks NJ's Dem Governor for Proving Why the SAVE Act MUST...
CNN’s Abby Phillip Demanded Evidence of Voter Fraud, Now There’s Proof and She’s...
Media Blackout: Mamdani Calls Bibi a War Criminal — Zero Questions for Dems...
Mark Warner Turns Into a Stammering Mess When Asked About the Socialist Takeover...
DSA Brain Trust Confuses Two Jewish Joshes, Then Ilhan Decries Bombs She Voted...
Scott Jennings Calls Out CNN’s Abby Phillip’s Word Games and Whataboutism on Non-Citizen...
CNN’s Jake Tapper Grapples With Non-Citizen Voting in NJ After Claiming It Wasn’t...
Chris Hayes: The Most Left-Wing People Have Postgraduate Degrees but Are Financially Strap...
Trans Wisconsin Assembly Candidate Who Lives in Poverty Pledges to Be GOP's Worst...
Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Says 'ICE Has Nothing to Do With Immigration'
Rep Ayanna Pressley Asks History Professor Why Neo-Fascist Autocrats Attack Museums
Worth Every Penny: Why Choosing Your Child’s Peers Matters More Than Test Scores
Nice Timing: Marc Elias Says: Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Demanding New Jersey Release Voter...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos