AP Reports That Noncitizen Voting Has Become a GOP Talking Point Even Though...
Greta Van Susteren Asks If Jake Tapper's the Right Choice to Be Moderating...
DA Kim Foxx Wouldn't Prosecute Over Drug or Weapons Found During a Routine...
CNN's Jim Acosta Points Out the Double-Standard of Colin Kaepernick Being Banned From...
Dr. Carol M. Swain Notes the Empty Space Where Robert E. Lee Statue...
Donald Trump Demands Drug Tests Before Debates With Joe Biden
The Biden Campaign Still Claiming Trump Told Americans to Inject Bleach
The Hill Earns Community Notes for Harrison Butker Headline
The Excitement for Biden is Palpable as POTUS' Motorcade Moves Through Atlanta
And You Thought OUR Congress Was Chaotic! Watch Taiwan Parliament Member STEAL Bill...
'Extremely Concerning': X Reacts to SCARY Study About Suicide Risk Following Gender-Affirm...
Sen. Brian Schatz Goes to the Land of Make Believe to Create Scenarios...
Has the Left Gone Too Far? Bill Maher Once Again Moves Toward the...
UH OH: Most Recent Apple iPhone Update Restores Deleted Pics, Leading to MAJOR...
Dem House Leader Says Congress Needs to Consider Legislating SCOTUS (Who Wants to...

Instagram clarifies terms of use after users revolt, delete accounts

“Legal documents are easy to misinterpret,” reads a statement rushed out by popular photo-sharing service Instagram this afternoon in an attempt to stem what looks like a huge exodus of users. An update to its terms of service led many to believe that Instagram, which was purchased by Facebook earlier this year, was planning to sell users’ photos to advertisers without their consent, prompting many, including celebrities and media personalities, to threaten to delete their accounts.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/markhoppus/status/281099968373202944

https://twitter.com/TheChrisAngel/status/281001793763299328

http://twitter.com/JaimieAlexander/statuses/281148445358690304

http://twitter.com/JonahHill/statuses/281186470813896705

Advertisement

Here’s the language that had everyone upset:

To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business or other entity may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos (along with any associated metadata), and/or actions you take, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you.

Advertisement

That was the word yesterday, anyway. Instagram insists in its statement today that it has no intention of selling anyone’s photos, and content uploaded by users remains their property. In the meantime, as Instagram revises its terms of service, it has offered the following scenario to calm users.

Let’s say a business wanted to promote their account to gain more followers and Instagram was able to feature them in some way. In order to help make a more relevant and useful promotion, it would be helpful to see which of the people you follow also follow this business. In this way, some of the data you produce — like the actions you take (eg, following the account) and your profile photo — might show up if you are following this business.

Will that be enough to draw users back? A campaign to #BoycottInstagram was already in full swing earlier in the day, and many had already deleted their photos, following instructions posted by tech blogs and other media outlets. Just because people post photos of every cup of cappuccino they drink doesn’t mean they don’t take their privacy very seriously.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/DruZovich/status/281052347067670529

https://twitter.com/TintinCapone/status/281108001522331648

With an apology extended and the picture a little clearer, will users be lured back? Twitchy will monitor the situation to see what develops.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement