Last we heard from Harvard’s David Hogg, he was working on a paper on the Second Amendment for his constitutional law class. He’ll probably get an A+ for the same reason Harvard granted him admission over much more gifted young people. Hogg’s takes on the Second Amendment are universally terrible, but Keith Olbermann got triggered by a tweet Thursday that led him to lay down the hammer on gun ownership.
#BREAKING: The Judiciary Committee just voted to repeal the ATF’s unconstitutional ban on pistol braces.
Big win for the Second Amendment.
— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) April 20, 2023
Hey, asshole. How come the second amendment doesn't contain the word "own" or any synonym for it? Because it's not about private ownership.
— Keith Olbermann↙️ (@KeithOlbermann) April 20, 2023
Thanks for clearing that up! Usually, they go after the “musket” argument or the “well-regulated” argument. But if the founders had meant for people to own guns, they would have put the word “own” in there.
'…the word "own" or any synonym…'
"…keep and bear…"
Keith, you're an idiot.
— J.G. Petruna (@jgpetruna) April 20, 2023
"keep"
— Matthew Kolken (@mkolken) April 20, 2023
— The 3D Print General (@3DPrintGeneral) April 20, 2023
Constitutional scholar…check notes…Keith Olbermann?
— The Cuban Dude (@dude_cuban) April 20, 2023
“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” pic.twitter.com/TelOWlTwSK
— Tiffany ✨ (@tiffanyandsadie) April 20, 2023
Keith, I am not a former sportscaster so I’m not as good at Constitution as you are but what does “keep” mean?
— Bill Zeiser (@BillZeiser) April 20, 2023
Okay Keith. Good luck with that argument.
— Not K (@NotK_US) April 20, 2023
Are you really this ignorant?
— Ryan Petty (@rpetty) April 20, 2023
…. am I confused in the meaning of "keep and bear"? Wtf else is that supposed to mean? Illicit acquisition and maintaining?
— Bimose (@x_Bimose_x) April 20, 2023
Could you be any more insufferable? Nobody wants to see that doughy mess anymore.
— Stocking Mill Coffee (@smcroasters) April 20, 2023
@BadLegalTakes next level take here.
— JGinWV (@JGinWV) April 20, 2023
Doesn’t understand synonyms, resorts to ad hominem attacks. Yeah sounds about right.
— Mr. Echo (@MrEchoIsHere) April 20, 2023
No, it's about stopping the government from infringing on private ownership. Hope this helps.
— Jordan Lee (@JordanLK17) April 20, 2023
Every law abiding citizen should be issued a taxpayer funded fully automatic machine gun and ammo as needed to train.
— Sean Dowey (@SeanDowey) April 20, 2023
— Nonessential worker (@BuckyStopsHere) April 20, 2023
I got you, fam:https://t.co/oOdZZuBaqw pic.twitter.com/cRBhNHOKi1
— Cameron Litany (@CameronLitany) April 20, 2023
Speaking of owning, watch this ratio.
— ShooterMcKevin (@ShooterMcKevin1) April 20, 2023
Because it says "the right of the *people* to *keep* and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The word you're looking for in that is "keep". Means the same as own. Kind of covers it. I mean this isn't that hard to understand and comprehend even if you're not all that competent.
— Dalton Sutton (@daltonsuttonio) April 20, 2023
If you can keep a gun, that’s pretty much private ownership. We notice he doesn’t elaborate on this hot take any further.
***
Related:
The dictionary is your FRIEND, Keith.
MOFO Keith Olbermann’s lame attempt to dunk on the Second Amendment FAILS in a spectacular wayhttps://t.co/dw9NBqaLV8
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) March 30, 2023
Join the conversation as a VIP Member