Cringe Democrat Tries Writing Snarky Poem for Kristi Noem and WOOF, Was That...
DAAAMN: WATCH Hillary's Face As Czech Deputy PM Macinka Shuts Her DOWN in...
Jake Tapper Cited Voter ID Polling to Chuck Schumer and the Pause Could...
You Can Literally SEE When AOC Short-Circuits Mid-Rant Explaining to Germans How Whiteness...
DHS Thanks Hillary Clinton for Finally Sounding More Like Trump on Immigration and...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
'Brand' New White Candace Owens Joins The Grift
Bad News: The Silence of the Lambs Has Been Canceled
Have Some Dignity: Fetterman Calls Out Dems and the Left Just Can't Deal
Lily Tang Williams Shares With Us Memories of Valentine’s Day in Mao’s Communist...
Leo The Turtle Escaping Fire Has Twitter All Ablaze
The Small Business Administration Plugs Entrepreneurship Week
Master of Projection: Obama Says Democrats Have It Hard Since They’re Not Mean...
Sen. Rick Scott Grades Universities As 'Failing Our Kids'
Climate Cultist Bill Maher Falls Flat on His Smug Face Trying to Dunk...

Tammy Bruce says tonight's January 6 hearing 'is a shameful display by grotesque people'

Do you think (some) people are excited for tonight’s live, televised January 6 committee hearing in prime time? As we’ve reported, Mark Hamill’s already posted a photo of himself eating popcorn, and CBS News’ Robert Costa just recently tweeted this photo of a door:

Advertisement

Seriously dude, it’s a door. Tweet a picture of your lunch or something.

Tammy Bruce is not so anxious to see tonight’s hearing, and she doesn’t hold back in explaining:

As we reported, the committee hired (using our money) the former president of ABC News to jazz things up and make it a “captivating multimedia presentation.” We’re kind of interested to see the graphics each network has come up with to introduce the hearings — we’re imagining a lot of panning around 3-D models of the Capitol Building.

Advertisement

Too true. They’ve already arrested what, like 400 people? Committee member Rep. Jamie Raskin tried to hype up the prime time special by hinting that the committee has a lot more evidence on Donald Trump than just incitement — but if they could even prove incitement, why haven’t they presented their findings to Attorney General Merrick Garland?

Because they have a “mountain of evidence” to present in just a short amount of time, so they need to jazz it up.

Advertisement

Good point.


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement