Anti-Gun Public Defender Has Felon Clients Serving Prison Terms for Having Guns They...
AP: Voting by Noncitizens Is Extremely Rare, but Trump Is Fueling Attempts to...
NBC News Exclusive: Pete Hegseth Considering 2028 Run
WaPo: Historic Cherry Trees Are Coming Down by the Dozen Thanks to Trump
Biden’s International Women of Courage Award Winner Lands on US Terror Watchlist, Visa...
Arizona AG Says Trump’s Mail-In Ballot Measures Will Go Into Effect Over Her...
Gov. Gavin Newsom Takes Credit for Judge Blocking Trump's EO on Securing Mail-In...
'So, Like, a Normie D**che': Hasan Piker Gets Demolished ... by His HAIRDRESSER
Gov. Josh Shapiro Claims Newborn Died From Measles, Doubles Down When Caught Lying
Mamdani's 'Signature Childcare Program' Launch Provides a Preview of City-Owned Grocery St...
'Learing Center' Alert! Minn. Dems Spent HOW MUCH on Beds That 7 Homeless...
Do You Notice Something About the Scene As Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Insists...
CNBC's Joe Kernen Delivered Some Brutal Trade War Reality Checks to Canada's Ex-...
WaPo Gets Shredded During Attempt to Help Dems With Spin About Arrested Illegals
Stephen Miller Drops a Truth Bomb About Illegal Aliens That Should Be in...
Premium

New York Times' 1619 Project creator says 'It would be an honor' to call the George Floyd riots the 1619 riots

The New York Post had a piece Saturday suggesting that the riots that exploded after the police-involved death of George Floyd in Minneapolis be called the “1619 riots.” Charles Kesler writes:

The justified indignation over George Floyd’s killing has led to calls for policing reform and for the country to do better at fulfilling its principles. But the reaction hasn’t stopped with those worthy and noble objectives. It has surged well beyond to an ­attack on the principles themselves, which allegedly give rise to “systemic racism.”

So who else can they get at? Well, an easier target is one particular set of privileged, white males: the American Founders. The system at the root of systemic racism, the radicals argue, is the American one, beginning with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. America, they claim, was born a racist nation and remains one today.

The most prominent proponent of the argument is The New York Times’s 1619 Project, named after the year the first black slaves arrived in America. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the Times reporter who leads the project, has argued that “the year 1619 is as important to the American story as 1776.”

Her editor, Jake Silverstein, has backed her to the hilt. Black slavery “is sometimes referred to as the country’s original sin,” he asserted, “but it is more than that: It is the country’s very origin. Out of slavery — and the anti-black racism it required — grew nearly everything that has truly made America exceptional,” especially “its astonishing penchant for violence” and “its endemic racial fears and hatreds.”

In other words, 1619 is not “as important” as 1776; it is far more important and more revealing.

To which Nikole Hannah-Jones replied she’d be honored if she had some influence on the naming of the riots:

As Sally Kohn pointed out, Hannah-Jones notes that “it’s only property” — maybe just a black-owned small business here or there that was looted and burned down during the 1619 riots, or a pharmacy on which blacks depended to fill their prescriptions.

The 1619 Project: Coming to your school soon if it’s not part of the curriculum already.


Related:

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement