BREAKING UPDATE: Rob Reiner And His Wife Are Confirmed Dead (UPDATE: Murdered by...
BREAKING: Two Found Dead at Rob Reiner's Residence
Big Families Are Beautiful – But Not When Foreign Billionaires Game U.S. Laws...
Bless Their Cold Black Hearts: CBS Town Hall With Erika Kirk has the...
CNN's Gun 'Expert' Stunned by Laser Sights on Handgun – Spoiler: They're Cheap,...
No Americans to Teach PE? Democrats Now Importing Gym Teachers for California Schools...
This Week on Capitol Hill: The 2026 Election Has Begun
Boom! 'Landman' Drops the Most Savage Roast on 'The View' Ever: Rich Hens...
Elder Abuse on the 50-Yard Line: Confused Biden Escapes His Handlers, Invades Eagles...
Global Intifada Hits Hanukkah: Jews Targeted from Bondi Beach to Brown Uni Bullets...
CNN’s Dana Bash Assists Dem Chris Murphy in Blaming Trump for Brown University...
Aussie Cops at Bondi: Fierce Against Maskless Beachgoers During COVID, Frozen Against Jiha...
Bondi Beach's 'Chanukah by the Sea' Becomes Terror Target as Armed Jihadist Slaughters...
Sen. Tim Scott: 'An Act of Antisemitic Hatred Turned a Moment of Celebration...
Krystal Ball Says It's a GOOD THING There Are Fewer White Peeps Posting...

CNN analysis: For some, China's model of control is looking increasingly attractive

As Twitchy reported, even an Atlantic staffer was quick to distance himself from an opinion piece in The Atlantic by two professors arguing that “significant speech control is an inevitable component of a ‘mature and flourishing internet.'” In the piece, the two argued that, in the debate over freedom vs. control of the internet, “China was largely correct, and the U.S. was wrong.”

Advertisement

Now Stephen Miller has noted that CNN is providing a somewhat similar analysis in a piece entitled, “China’s model of control has been blamed for the coronavirus crisis, but for some it’s looking increasingly attractive.”

James Griffiths writes for CNN:

Just as crises around fake news and online disinformation have made it easier for China to push its model of internet sovereignty — one that has been happily embraced by those governments already keen to censor online dissent — so too has the current pandemic provided an opportunity and an excuse to pursue the type of authoritarian power exercised by Beijing.

But for those pushing these changes, China could be perceived to be a strong argument that an empowered state is what is needed to respond to the pandemic. Regardless of the many valid criticisms of how Beijing initially handled the crisis, it appears to have been able to get its domestic epidemic under control and the economy back on track better than many other countries.

The US government, meanwhile, presents something of an uneasy contrast: with a President musing about whether ingesting disinfectants could be used to treat the virus and encouraging protesters to demand an end to quarantine measures.

Advertisement

It doesn’t seem that uneasy a contrast to us: We’ll take the president musing about “ingesting disinfectants” and ending crippling statewide lockdowns over whatever Beijing has to offer.

We’re old enough to remember all of the think-pieces about how maybe absolute freedom of speech wasn’t such a good thing after all — the ones that appeared after President Trump was inaugurated. And it was only last November when the New York Times offered up an opinion piece entitled, “Free Speech Is Killing Us.”

Miller’s right: Pay attention.

Advertisement

Advertisement

It’s not just America, either:

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement