Gregg Jarrett, Fox News political analyst, didn’t hold back Saturday when claiming that the so-called whistleblower is no such thing and as such is not entitled to have his identity protected — even though his lawyers seem to have given up the game by issuing a statement threatening publications as soon as they started publicizing his suspected name.
A lot of people have referred to the whistleblower as a spy, and Jarrett seems to agree:
The so-called “whistleblower” is NOT a whistleblower under the law, as I first explained in a column 6 weeks ago. Hence, he is NOT entitled to identity protection —he doesn’t qualify. He’s an undercover informant and Dem operative who was spying on Trump and working with Schiff.
— Gregg Jarrett (@GreggJarrett) November 2, 2019
Schiff has been hiding his identity and obstructing all questions about him in order to conceal the evidence of how this informant colluded with Schiff and his staff to invent a pretext to impeach the President. This is the “malignant force” I write about in my book Witch Hunt.
— Gregg Jarrett (@GreggJarrett) November 2, 2019
Agree.
— SeaWolfe (@SeaSunWolfe) November 2, 2019
Exactly
— Jenny Pucci (@JennyPucci1) November 2, 2019
He’s a leaker
— America?MAGA!!! (@UoKnowsBest) November 2, 2019
He’s a leaker. Perhaps a felon, if he leaked classified info, and failed to tell the IG he had contact with Schiff or Schiff’s staff. May have done this to avoid being charged.
So makes sense the Grand Inquisitor is keeping him under wraps. Deserves all the outing he gets.
— TestaDuda (@TestaDuda) November 2, 2019
He’s a leaker & should be prosecuted just like what Obama did with them.
— K.R. Lloyd Persaud (@Kayarel) November 2, 2019
Obama jailed 8 whistleblowers why are the GOP such cowards why don’t they lower the boom and protect this president?
— KevinO’leoiden (@oleyden) November 2, 2019
Gregg, this seems like sedition to me. This is an organized action meant to sow discontent with the goal of overthrowing a duly elected president. Why is no one being held accountable?
— carolyn tackett (@CarolsCloset) November 2, 2019
They are making it up as they go. Oh yeah, they don’t care about rules and laws.
— David Kennedy (@dwk64) November 2, 2019
WBs are NOT entitled to anonymity, only protection from reprisal like losing their job. They can be reassigned to a basement in Antarctica, though.
— Patriot?? (@I_missJohnWayne) November 2, 2019
We should be asking:
Where’s Schiff’s undercover informant?@realDonaldTrump
— KK Berd (@keny_berd) November 2, 2019
Related:
Report: Talks between whistleblower’s legal team and Schiff’s staff halt; Whistleblower unlikely to testify https://t.co/OrYv9l3cLK
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) November 1, 2019
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.