Monday Morning Meme Madness
Wallace and Vomit: MS NOW Host Regurgitates the Laughable Lie That Obama’s Presidency...
Safe at Home: DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Explains to CNN's Jake Tapper Why...
Woke CA Teacher Brags About Marrying Gaza Resident Online for Green Card —...
Far-Left Sends Elite Prep School Socialist Oliver Larkin to Primary Jared Moskowitz (Becau...
DeWine Intervention: Ohio Governor Tells CNN’s Jake Tapper Why He's Against Sending ‘Temp’...
Dem Raphael Warnock: Socialists and Communists Are Welcome Under His Party’s ‘Big Tent’...
Tweet Makes a Point About the Consequences of Socialism
No Money for Schools? Mary Katharine Ham Schools the Commie on NYC's $40K-Per-Student...
Sen. Blackburn, Gov. Stitt Congratulate ICE Nominee
DeWine, Kasich Argue Against Removing Haitians
Aw, How Heartbreaking: Illegal Parents Forced to Take Their Kids Home With Them
Exceptionalism Unmatched: Full-Service America Hosts Iran for World Cup … Then Bombs Them...
Meltdown ALERT! Thomas Massie Lashing OUT When Asked About Ex-GF and an NDA...
'Hello, Mr. French': DataRepublican Turns Her Attention to David French and HOOBOY, YIKES,...

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement