It's 'Orangeland' Now: President Trump Announces PERMANENT Greenland Security Deal
Napoleonic Syndrome: Stepstool Abdul Challenges Vance to a Beard Inspection and Weightlift...
DeSantis Is Enforcing the Law, but Rep. Salazar Is Selling Amnesty With a...
Here's Another Gem of an Illegal Biden Let Into the U.S. (Bill Melugin...
Fairfax County Atty.'s Pledge to Prosecute Those Who Threaten Public Safety Is a...
Gavin Newsom Helpfully Just Made It More Clear Than Ever That He's Insane...
Joe Scarborough Blew His Big Interview With Abdul El-Sayed
You KNOW It's Getting Bad for El-Sayed When Even Morning Joe Is Calling...
NRSC Video Montage ENDS Abdul El-Sayed's Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Twitch...
People Are LOVING Laura Ingraham Taking Abdul El-Sayed APART for Ignorant Comment on...
Oh, HONEY: Lefty Phone Banker Roasted for Whining That Voters Keep Asking Her...
'Now We Know Why'! Scott Jennings Flashes Back to What Happened on CNN...
This Is RICH: Chuck Schumer’s PAC Drops Some SERIOUS Coin on Supposed Anti-Big-Money...
Trump's Second Term Will Never Survive the Latest Cringe-Worthy Celebrity 'Resistance' Vid...
Climate Exchange: AI Doomsayers Sound Just Like Climate Doomsayers

The folks at The Bulwark think 'the three horsemen' could be 'force multipliers' in prying Trump out of office

Just to make it clear upfront: Bill Kristol didn’t write the piece; it was Jonathan Last who came up with the metaphor of — get this — Bill Weld, Joe Walsh, and Mark Sanford being the “three horsemen coming for Trump.”

Advertisement

For what it’s worth, on Monday night, President Trump dismissed the three as “a total joke.” He doesn’t sound concerned to us, but maybe he’s just good at hiding his fear.

In any case, here’s Bill Kristol pointing to Last’s piece in The Bulwark.

And here’s the thinking of where each horseman of the apocalypse stands in providing leverage against Trump:

Which is where Mark Sanford comes in. He’s the obvious—and predictable—reaction to Trump’s transformation of the party’s fiscal orthodoxies.

The same can be said—along different vectors—about Weld and Walsh.

Weld represents the kind of moderate, establishment Republicanism that has been on the outs in the party since John Anderson in 1980. The Rockefeller wing of the party was never very big. Outside of the Northeast it’s miniscule. But it exists. And most conservative presidents have tried to stroke it (as needed) rather than crap all over it.

As for Walsh, he’s the representative of Trump’s unfulfilled populist promises: There is no wall. What we’re getting is 174 miles of fence and it’s going to be paid for by abusing the Constitution to take money that was supposed to keep schools for the children of U.S. soldiers safe from terrorist attacks.

Advertisement

But which one is going to conserve conservatism the best? Which one is Molly Jong-Fast going to vote for?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement