Dave Portnoy EMBARRASSES Graham Platner's Team for Thinking He Would 'Play Footsy with...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Gets Ratioed Into the Sun for His First Remembrance...
Graham Platner Slammed Long-Serving Politicians While Bernie Sanders Stood Next to Him and...
Liberal Celebs Sounding Alarms About the First Amendment Need Some Reminders
EPIC Thread Compares Principled Libertarian Thomas Massie to Conspiracy-Obsessed Populist...
Margaret Brennan's Attempt to Goad 2 Medal of Honor Recipients Into Bashing America...
Fear-Mongering Fail-Fest! John Stossel Marks 20th Anniversary of Al Gore's An Inconvenient...
Nick Sortor Made Me Cry on X … the Reason Why Will Make...
GRRL, BYE: Auto-Pen Justice Who Can't Define a Woman Lectures SCOTUS on 'Impartiality'...
Roseanne Just Needs ONE Brutally Honest Post to End Thomas Massie's Days-Long CRASH...
Miranda Devine Has a GREAT Offer for Hunter Biden 'Instead of Taking Swipes...
From Bartender to President? AOC's Cringe National 'Not a 2028 Campaign' Tour Has...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
LA Mayoral Candidate Raman Looks Like a Wet Noodle After CNN Journo Pushes...
The Gardener from Jamaica and the Limits of Pocket-Watching Billionaires

The folks at The Bulwark think 'the three horsemen' could be 'force multipliers' in prying Trump out of office

Just to make it clear upfront: Bill Kristol didn’t write the piece; it was Jonathan Last who came up with the metaphor of — get this — Bill Weld, Joe Walsh, and Mark Sanford being the “three horsemen coming for Trump.”

Advertisement

For what it’s worth, on Monday night, President Trump dismissed the three as “a total joke.” He doesn’t sound concerned to us, but maybe he’s just good at hiding his fear.

In any case, here’s Bill Kristol pointing to Last’s piece in The Bulwark.

And here’s the thinking of where each horseman of the apocalypse stands in providing leverage against Trump:

Which is where Mark Sanford comes in. He’s the obvious—and predictable—reaction to Trump’s transformation of the party’s fiscal orthodoxies.

The same can be said—along different vectors—about Weld and Walsh.

Weld represents the kind of moderate, establishment Republicanism that has been on the outs in the party since John Anderson in 1980. The Rockefeller wing of the party was never very big. Outside of the Northeast it’s miniscule. But it exists. And most conservative presidents have tried to stroke it (as needed) rather than crap all over it.

As for Walsh, he’s the representative of Trump’s unfulfilled populist promises: There is no wall. What we’re getting is 174 miles of fence and it’s going to be paid for by abusing the Constitution to take money that was supposed to keep schools for the children of U.S. soldiers safe from terrorist attacks.

Advertisement

But which one is going to conserve conservatism the best? Which one is Molly Jong-Fast going to vote for?

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement