Ah, the days of “tick-tock” and “Mueller time!” We’ve featured some of Jim Carrey’s artwork before, such as his portrait of the Covington Catholic High School students, which he called “Baby Snakes,” and his really disturbing rendering of Donald Trump’s mother giving birth to something “definitely not human” as the doctors look on in horror.
We’re sure Carrey enjoys doing portraits of obvious villains like Trump and the monstrous so-called Christian Sarah Huckabee Sanders, but we’ll bet it hurt a little bit for him to paint a defeated Robert Mueller, who let a tyrant skate. Maybe he thinned the paint with his tears.
You let us down Mr. Mueller. You saw obstruction and washed your hands of it. Not indicting a President is a memo, not a law. You let a tyrant skate with “I don’t remember”. You gave the enemy a leg up. Live with that…”PROSECUTOR” pic.twitter.com/aE305iCPmE
— Jim Carrey (@JimCarrey) April 28, 2019
Um, Mueller wasn’t a prosecutor but a special counsel, and a special counsel doesn’t indict. And how did he let you down … by not finding the evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia that you expected him to find?
Just for fun, here’s how the Krassenstein brothers depicted Robert Mueller … um, “Robert Moral” … in their children’s book, published before the end of the investigation, obviously:
Sorry Hillary lost fair and square, Jim.
Jim Carrey, April 30th: "Mueller is a corrupt liar."
This is what an incoherent asshole looks like.https://t.co/LUgO5Glxil
— BonkPolitics (@BonkPolitics) April 30, 2019
I'm gonna make stuff up in my head, convince myself it's true, then repudiate all those who actually investigated and concluded the opposite. The mind is a terrible thing to waste.
— SmilingAssassin27 (@RJCHVZ) April 30, 2019
It wasn’t his job to prosecute
— Huevo Estrellado (@diaz4228) April 28, 2019
Thought you were worried about collusion, like Hillary and the DNC did. Trump had no reason to obstruct anything, and never used executive privilege. Nothing you are ranting about makes any sense.
— Blue Nosed Gopher (@BlueNosedGopher) April 30, 2019
TDS is real. Get help Jim.
— MateoXRP (@MateoXrp) April 30, 2019
Seems a bit of wishful thinking if you think there is Obstruction when no crime was committed.
— Nemo (@Nemo_o) April 28, 2019
— Karen Z (@ksusze) April 29, 2019
Or maybe ….just maybe …. There was no "there there"
If you turn the channel, or go read non tunnel vision propaganda, you might be enlightened.
Have a great and blessed day.
— Net (@Joeneto) April 28, 2019
Hmm might want to rethink this one.
— Wicked Big RU Mob Thug In The WH Blues ?⚖️✨?? (@RhapsodysBIues) April 29, 2019
WRONG!! Mr. Mueller created a LEGAL document based on LEGAL law, not personal opinion. Which was created for Congress to use to do what they felt they needed to do. A prosecutor HAS to base findings on firm facts, that meet legal requirements.
— BethGrantDeRoos (@BethGrantDeRoos) April 28, 2019
This is a bad bad take Mr Carrey. Mueller followed the rules and discovered everything he did legitimately.
He should be praised.
— MikeFratocrat (@MikeFratocrat) April 29, 2019
— Grant Meredith (@glm671) April 28, 2019
Your support group is here waiting:
I honestly never thought Mueller would make a joke of himself & take the cowards' way out. I was mistaken. We are all utterly let down.
— Kathy Ellen Dosta (@KathyDosta) April 29, 2019
— Ph.D. Latino (@happydesertdude) April 30, 2019
They got to him Jim…..
— Edmundo W Alayo (@alayo_eddie) April 29, 2019
He definitely let us down. As Bill Maher said…"We needed Superman, but we got Clark Kent."
— Gloria Molnar-Jandt (@bobeebah) April 28, 2019
You needed evidence … go ask Rep. Adam Schiff to turn over all the proof he claims to have of Russian collusion.
Citation, please: Rep. Nadler says Mueller couldn't prove a criminal conspiracy because 'lots of people destroyed evidence' https://t.co/j8W6MzCyJy
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 19, 2019