Just once we’d like to write a post about a journalism professor that wasn’t based on ridicule, but here we are once again. Jeff Jarvis of the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York happened to flip past “AMJoy” on MSNBC and decided this is what cable news should look like.
There is no good reason why more cable news shows do not look like this. pic.twitter.com/QlUocyzNZJ
— Jeff Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) April 27, 2019
To be perfectly honest, we were in total disagreement at first because the screenshot shows just what we need less of on cable news shows; that is, the screen split into tiny boxes to accommodate 15 different pundits all talking at the same time from different locations.
Guess we weren’t woke enough to realize what he actually meant.
I’d suggest doubling to 10-people in little boxes. At minimum two guests have to have mic problems & another two can’t wait their turn & MUST talk over everyone else. I’d also suggest cutting segments in half for important topics. Something big can be solved in 120-180 seconds
— Uncle Pennybags (@UnclePennybags5) April 27, 2019
That's not what I'm talking about.
— Jeff Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) April 27, 2019
This is the part where you explain what you’re talking about. Twitter gives you 280 characters now.
I agree! It's a fantastic layout! Too many times news shows try to bunch up their guests into a single row on the tv, so you just get these little slices. This layout gives a more relaxed feeling and it's probably much easier to follow along with each speaker! Good job MSNBC!
— bob from sales (@wafflenbaitshop) April 27, 2019
Recommended
Uh, that's not what I am saying. What else separates this panel from almost all others?
— Jeff Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) April 27, 2019
….your virtue has been significantly signaled. ?
I tend to watch political commentators for their political commentary, not their skin color.
— Grand Poobah of the interwebs ? (@PeterThemeh1) April 27, 2019
Oh, he means more black commentators. If we saw everything in terms of race we would have picked up on that right away.
Usually I’m just listening to the news shows while I browse the Internet or something. Why would I care what the show *looks* like when I’m not even looking at the tv? I watch the news for information, not aesthetics.
— Leonard Goodnight (@LennyGoodnight) April 27, 2019
I care about diverse voices on those shows.
— Jeff Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) April 27, 2019
Yes, we always turn on MSNBC and Joy Reid for the most diverse panel of opinions from across the political spectrum.
So why do you like this one, where the voices are all pretty homogenous?
— Leonard Goodnight (@LennyGoodnight) April 27, 2019
No, it's the rest of cable news that is homogenous.
— Jeff Jarvis (@jeffjarvis) April 27, 2019
A racist cable news show?
BTW did Joy find out who hacked her account?
— Alex ?? (@Rabidcow1) April 27, 2019
We think the FBI is still looking into that, but they got sidetracked by that threatening letter Jussie Smollett received.
— New Maxico (@Maximiliannn) April 27, 2019
That is actually one of the more racially homogeneous panels I've seen on cable news in recent years.
Not sure why race would be the variable to consider if your real interest is viewpoint diversity though. Equating the two seems a bit counterintuitive.
— Bryan Smucker (@BryanSmucker) April 27, 2019
Who cares what they have to say, as long as they look the part? Because it the looks, and more specifically, the proper coloring, that matter, amirite??
— Chris (@cbent2199) April 27, 2019
We need more representation for people of idiocy!
— Jeff (@Coach_JIB) April 27, 2019
Ahh, the illusion of diversity. God forbid they think differently from one another, though.
— Joseph (@Yinz_r_jagoffs) April 27, 2019
The question isn’t what they look like, they question is what kind of diversity of ideas are they presenting. If they all sound the same, parroting the same thing, while excluding different opinions, then the show isn’t a good one.
— Joseph Wade Miller ✝️ (@J_Wade_Miller) April 27, 2019
If I put a blanket over my TV and listen to what is being said, the most important thing, then I shouldn’t be able to tell what their skin color is. That’s a good show and I want more of that kind of show.
— Joseph Wade Miller ✝️ (@J_Wade_Miller) April 27, 2019
So you are calling for what exactly?
— Aaron Gianakis (@big_blue56) April 27, 2019
Virtue signal much?
— D Droid (@droiddan) April 27, 2019
Care to elaborate? Is it because there aren’t any white people on the panel? Or are you just fishing for some virtue signal points today?
— Todd Paxton (@iamtoddpaxton) April 27, 2019
You mean completely lacking in diversity? pic.twitter.com/UTq5CBhLC3
— Pete (@rationalstoic) April 27, 2019
Absolutely. Diversity over talent at all costs.
— Robert Smith (@biglittlebobby5) April 27, 2019
I am embarrassed for you.
— NNX (@ninomontagna13) April 27, 2019
Related:
Hot take: The outdated, archaic Constitution has become a threat to liberal democracy in America https://t.co/HNYtNjgaVS
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 25, 2019
Join the conversation as a VIP Member