The big news Tuesday night is, of course, the Washington Post confirming that a lawyer working for both the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC helped fund research for the Russian dossier that was supposed to make it clear beyond a doubt that candidate Donald Trump was subject to blackmail by the Kremlin.

Reporters from all over the spectrum are retweeting the Washington Post, and that includes Maggie Haberman of the New York Times. Haberman formerly worked for Politico and had “a very good relationship” with the Hillary Clinton campaign, according to John Podesta’s leaked emails: “We have had her tee up stories for us before and have never been disappointed,” wrote Nick Merrill, Clinton’s former campaign press secretary.

So it follows that people who follow Haberman on Twitter are largely fans of Hillary, and their reactions to her retweeting the Washington Post story —and using the words “lied about it” in connection with their funding of the research — are telling. Guess we assumed incorrectly: Haberman has been a huge Trump fan all along.

You want the truth? You can’t handle the truth.

Yeah, Andrea Mitchell was just a brutal presence on the Clinton campaign plane. Remember that one time she tried to ask a question?

“Maggie” had nothing to do with the story — it’s from another paper entirely, but please, continue to pile on.

Yep, frothing at the mouth.

“Your guy.”

“Exposing patriots.”

* * *