Fox News host Bret Baier dedicated Monday night’s “Special Report” to a town hall meeting in Detroit in which both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton participated (separately, of course). Sanders didn’t have much new to say, but Baier did bring up the latest findings of the FBI’s “security review” of the State Department’s email practices.
— MRCTV.org (@mrctv) March 7, 2016
— Fox News (@FoxNews) March 7, 2016
Clinton noted that venerated Secretary of State Colin Powell also had received secret or classified emails at his personal email address (two emails, to be precise). However, Clinton was careful as always to qualify that she never sent nor received emails that were marked classified, a meaningless distinction it looks like she’s counting on for cover in the case of an indictment.
Dear Hillary: Info isn’t classified because it’s marked classified, it’s marked classified because it’s classified.
— Eric H. (@ericinva) March 7, 2016
That can’t be repeated enough times. Clinton said early on in the scandal, as secretary of state, of course she would know what’s classified and what isn’t. Who needs markings? She does, apparently.
Hillary: nothing I sent/received "was MARKED classified." Classified by content, not markings, Hillary.
— Jedediah Bila (@JedediahBila) March 7, 2016
Wow, Hillary Clinton insists to @BretBaier that she never sent "any classified material" via email, despite evidence to the contrary.
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) March 7, 2016
private server, hillary. not just private email. that breaks the rule. and they don't need to be marked "classified"
— RobH (@RobHoey) March 7, 2016
Hillary is lying. She knows darn well that emails she creates haven't been marked yet. It's about the content, not the markings.
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) March 7, 2016
Lying? That’s a serious charge. Speaking of, maybe someone could get serious and charge Clinton already.
Hillary setup this server specifically so she could say “nothing was marked classified” when she ultimately received these questions.
— Tom Elliott (@tomselliott) March 7, 2016
Just curious – will Hillary's highly likely indictment be "marked" indictment?#DemTownHall
— Blue State Snooze (@BlueSnoozeBlue) March 7, 2016
Hillary assumes we're all stupid with these "nothing was marked classified" answers. It's about the content not the markings #DemDebate
— Ryan Mahoney (@rcmahoney) March 7, 2016
Hillary still lying about emails. "None of them marked classified" As the SOS you are the originator and the term classified doesn't exist.
— Packerfanforever (@pakerfan2011) March 7, 2016
Of course nothing Hillary sent was marked classified. Was she going to mark it herself? She broke the law. Period. https://t.co/c2Lfpmaj3z
— Scott Ruesterholz (@Read_N_Learn) March 7, 2016
#Hillary says nothing she sent was marked classified … bc she told people to take the classified markings off before it was sent.
— Lrry Keho (@lrrykeho) March 7, 2016
— David Almacy (@almacy) March 7, 2016
Liar Hillary spins her email crime: "Nothing I sent or received was MARKED classified". Pure BS. Unmarked doesn't mean unclassified.
— William Lee (@genryle) March 7, 2016
Hillary never sent/received MARKED emails. Because her minions cut pasted it before forwarding and left off the marking. SNEAKY #DemTownHall
— kerry mc (@kerrygmcelligot) March 8, 2016
Why doesn't anyone ask #Hillary if the emails SHOULD have been marked with proper classification markings?
— Mike Gorbell (@gorbell) March 8, 2016
— Tedlink (@Tedlinknews) March 7, 2016
Baier can drop the ball all he wants as long as the FBI doesn’t fumble this one.
To change your comments display name, click here.