'Biology hasn't changed': Ed Krassenstein is RATIOED into oblivion with his definition of a woman

Ed Krassenstein has made it into a Twitchy story or two for being ridiculous and this time is no different.

Krassenstein decided to get in on the ‘What is a Woman’ side of Twitter and his take is so stupid he is being ratioed into oblivion!

What is a Woman?

Up until 5 years ago I would have admittedly said "a woman is someone with a vagina."

But time, education and an openness to try and understand other people's perspectives has changed my views.

If you were to ask me "What is a woman" today, I, like a lot of… pic.twitter.com/6bd4ucmc4o

— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) June 2, 2023

It is long and it is stupid so in order to save you some time the summary is that Ed thinks defining a woman is hard now because it is subjective just like people who believe in God may have various ideas of who God is.

Yup. You read that right. He is comparing the various beliefs about God to defining a woman. People on Twitter have been commenting and telling him how dumb he is for about 14 hours at the time of this article and it was still going.

The only people that struggle to answer the question “what is a woman?” Are either idiots or liars. Pick one… the rest of use know, the word woman refers to adult human females. https://t.co/dO6cFBqud3

— Suffragents (@d4ds4g4inst) June 2, 2023

We feel like Krassenstein knows which category he would fall into, but the tweeter did leave out one category: GRIFTER, and that one may suit Ed best.

The reality of what a woman is isn’t a matter of belief. It’s a self-evident reality. Facts are knowable and exist independently of your beliefs. Reality has a way of not caring about your beliefs.

— Jenna Ellis 🐊🇺🇸 (@JennaEllisEsq) June 2, 2023

Admittedly, I watched Matt Walsh’s documentary and thought it was really good and brought up a lot of valid points. Does that make me transphobic? Does that make me an evil anti-gay person? I sure hope not. Like many others, I’m just trying to figure this all out.

— Jacob in Cambodia (@jacobincambodia) June 2, 2023

Watching it and asking questions does NOT make you transphobic Jacob, it makes you smart.

A woman is someone who identifies as a woman. That’s the difference between gender and sex. We should still not let transgender women compete in Olympic sports however

— Josh Jay (@citizenjoshjay) June 2, 2023

Josh was trying really hard to balance his comments there. We will go a step further and say they should not compete in ANY women’s sports not just the Olympics, but we do not think that should be a controversial opinion. it should be common sense.

I agree with the sports argument for the most part. I do think that in cases where puberty hasn't kicked in yet, sports could essentially be co-ed.

— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) June 2, 2023

To Krassenstein’s credit, he actually answered that tweet and we are amazed he kind of stumbled onto a good opinion. Maybe tee ball with kindergarteners is fine to be coed, but a 5-year-old boy can be wild and will probably create a lot of chaos.

Ever been to a kids' swimming carnival? Little athletics event? Boys would dominate every single event; do you think that would affect girls' sporting aspirations? Sorry girls, Ed reckons sports could essentially be co'ed, isn't he virtuous?!?

— . (@LongSlenderBody) June 2, 2023

*snickers* We have indeed been to a coed soccer game or two and that description is fitting, but it did not really keep any girls from going on into sports, it definitely could though if it continued on into higher age groups and the girls never had a chance to win a single match.

I ain't readin' all that.

Instead, why don't you just say, "I've been indoctrinated by an anti-science cult."

You'd be saying the exact same thing and you'd save everyone some time.

— Ultra Grateful Calvin 🇺🇸🐶🏒 🎶 (@shoveitjack) June 2, 2023

SMART! We are sorry we read all of it, but we hope you read the article about how stupid it is even if you did not make it through the thesis Krassenstein posted on Twitter. 🙂

We do like the ant-science cult name. It is perfect for the Leftists that claim to be ‘the party of science’.

This might be the most insane comparison I’ve ever read.

Comparing God, a concept everyone has had different thoughts/opinions on for all of human history:

To “what is a woman”, which for all of history (until 5 minutes ago) was the same definition for everyone in history

— Fran Walsh (@FranWalsh73) June 2, 2023

IT IS INSANE!

It's not a subjective question

— Comrade Bot (@xxdspence49) June 2, 2023

Correct. Krassenstein is making an objective fact a subjective theory. We are glad there are some of us left that are not buying any of it.

Have you ever been ratio'd to oblivion this badly?

— Sara Rose 🇺🇸🌹 (@saras76) June 2, 2023

To be fair, he tweets some silly things so probably. LOL

This is the stuff of Monty Python sketches

You’re not serious people pic.twitter.com/jueRBXohhL

— Gummi Bear (@gummibear737) June 2, 2023

HA! We love that, but the sad thing is, we think he is actually serious and he thinks it is a good argument.

Maybe if Krassenstein watches ‘What is a Woman’ he could find some real answers.

We do not advocate for any hate or abuse toward trans people, this editor actually has a lot of empathy for the community as we have a trans person in our life that we love very much. We still would not want a biological male competing in sports against our daughters. It is ok to accept a person and love them but also discuss the realities of what trans-radical activists are doing and how it affects biological women.

‘What is a Woman’ is free to watch all weekend on Twitter and we highly recommend it no matter what you think about trans issues.

********************************************************************

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy’s conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!