Nick Shirley Spotlights the Record Gavin Newsom Has to Overcome As His Presidential...
Dancing on Charlie Kirk’s Grave: Hanania’s Anniversary Hit Job and Ahmari’s Endorsement Sp...
This YOU, Sir? 'Sarah' McBride Passive-Aggressively Subtweeting John Fetterman Goes OH SO...
Paladino Tells Hasan Piker to Go Back Where He Came From — and...
BOOM — > Kurt Schlichter DISMANTLES Marc Elias and His Overseas Voter Scare...
WI Dem Gives Democrats Up Claiming She's Visiting 'Constituents' in Detention Center
Nice Try, WEIRDO: So, About That Fancy List of Fancy 'Republicans' Endorsing Talarico?...
Megyn Kelly's Bright Idea of 'Saving' Erika Kirk Sounds Like Bending the Knee...
Harmeet Dhillon Has a Question for Kimmel and 'No One Is Above the...
Abigail Spanberger Shows Virginia Who She REALLY Is When Journo Asks Her About...
Our Friend, Charlie Kirk
American Heroes of 9/11: Chief Peter Ganci, Jr.
MS NOW Finds All SORTS of Republicans Suddenly Voting for James Talarico, There's...
HOOOBOY: John Thune Receives BRUTAL Wake-Up Call from His Own Party at RNC...
YIKES: What the Lone Holdout Juror Had to Endure During Clancy Deliberations Keeps...

Pro-Trans Amnesty International Gets DRAGGED for Saying the 'Patriarchy' Is Harming Women's Rights

Meme screenshot

There's tone deaf, and then there's ... whatever the heck this is.

Amnesty International was one of the organizations that fought for the rights of 'trans women' (read: men) before the U.K. Supreme Court, and called the Court's ruling that biological women have rights 'disappointing,' so for them to claim they have any vested interest in resisting 'patriarchal oppression' is laughable, at best.

Advertisement

There's a pending Community Note using Amnesty's own words against it:

Amnesty International UK has published its third-party intervention in the Supreme Court appeal of the case of For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers, which will be heard this week (26/27 November), with a judgment at a later date. 

The Supreme Court is called to answer the question of whether a person with a Gender Recognition Certificate that recognises her gender as female, is a woman for the purposes of the Equality Act and the protections against sex discrimination that the Act provides. The decision will address whether existing legislation which has been understood in this manner for many years should still be understood in this way.   

Amnesty is increasingly concerned about the deterioration of rights and the quality of life for trans people in the UK and abroad. Amnesty has intervened in this case to set out why legal gender recognition is a human rights issue and why existing protections are right and necessary. 

In other words, Amnesty International went to court to defend the rights of men over women.

Advertisement

All of this.

In locker rooms, bathrooms, rape crisis centers, maternity wards.

Exactly. This writer wants Amnesty to define 'woman' before talking about the patriarchy.

They do it so men can oppress women, thus enabling the patriarchy they claim to fight. It doesn't help women and they don't care.

And no, they don't accept the Court's ruling.

Amnesty International is worthless.

Advertisement

Yup.

Please, tell us, Amnesty.

Just incredible.

We love to see them get absolutely dragged over this.

Because they're hypocrites.

Editor's Note: The Democrat Party has never been less popular as voters reject its globalist agenda.


Help us continue exposing Democrats' plans to lead America down a dangerous path. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement