TDS Media Claim Trump Was Made to Feel 'Very Small' With a Bad...
Jasmine Crockett Says Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Continues to Flex Her Brilliance’
‘If I Steal a Wallet in Japan,’ Justice KBJ Argues That Makes Her...
Ron DeSantis Is Not a Boomer: FL Gov Drops Common Sense on Worthless...
Harmeet Dhillon and Others Weigh in As Dems Hyperventilate About Trump's SCOTUS Visit
Trump Stares Down Liberal Justices As Ketanji Brown Jackson Cracks Under Pressure
The Christian School Movement of the 1970s
Whitney Cummings Admits She's Diagnosed Crazy, Then Proves It by Claiming Trump Runs...
'So Effing Effed': Nevada Dem Rep. Susie Lee Drops Vulgar Meltdown Over Trump...
WaPo Joins Lib Media Hacks Circling the Wagons in Attempt to Make Eric...
Congrats, Justice Jackson! Even Sotomayor and Kagan Think You’re the Dumbest One Now
Judicial Activism Run Amok: Obama Judge Orders Trump to Make Illegals Legal Again...
Dems Say Trump's Shattering Political Norms and Trying to Intimidate SCOTUS Justices
The 1962 Supreme Court Decision That Banned School Prayer
Sen. Amy Klobuchar Tries to Take a Jab at Trump Over Gas Prices...

Pro-Trans Amnesty International Gets DRAGGED for Saying the 'Patriarchy' Is Harming Women's Rights

Meme screenshot

There's tone deaf, and then there's ... whatever the heck this is.

Amnesty International was one of the organizations that fought for the rights of 'trans women' (read: men) before the U.K. Supreme Court, and called the Court's ruling that biological women have rights 'disappointing,' so for them to claim they have any vested interest in resisting 'patriarchal oppression' is laughable, at best.

Advertisement

There's a pending Community Note using Amnesty's own words against it:

Amnesty International UK has published its third-party intervention in the Supreme Court appeal of the case of For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers, which will be heard this week (26/27 November), with a judgment at a later date. 

The Supreme Court is called to answer the question of whether a person with a Gender Recognition Certificate that recognises her gender as female, is a woman for the purposes of the Equality Act and the protections against sex discrimination that the Act provides. The decision will address whether existing legislation which has been understood in this manner for many years should still be understood in this way.   

Amnesty is increasingly concerned about the deterioration of rights and the quality of life for trans people in the UK and abroad. Amnesty has intervened in this case to set out why legal gender recognition is a human rights issue and why existing protections are right and necessary. 

In other words, Amnesty International went to court to defend the rights of men over women.

Advertisement

All of this.

In locker rooms, bathrooms, rape crisis centers, maternity wards.

Exactly. This writer wants Amnesty to define 'woman' before talking about the patriarchy.

They do it so men can oppress women, thus enabling the patriarchy they claim to fight. It doesn't help women and they don't care.

And no, they don't accept the Court's ruling.

Amnesty International is worthless.

Advertisement

Yup.

Please, tell us, Amnesty.

Just incredible.

We love to see them get absolutely dragged over this.

Because they're hypocrites.

Editor's Note: The Democrat Party has never been less popular as voters reject its globalist agenda.


Help us continue exposing Democrats' plans to lead America down a dangerous path. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement