Serious question: Did Sally Kohn really think this would go well?
Serious question: If respectable news outlets were granted interview with Hitler, would they take it? Give him airtime? What's right call?
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) May 11, 2017
If a respected Ivy League school was granted an audience with a violent Holocaust denier, should it take it? https://t.co/AmTqUOdk77
— Razor (@hale_razor) May 11, 2017
Because it happened, yup.
https://twitter.com/newaustinite/status/862647684792025088
HA. Excellent point.
Where is she going with this?
On the one hand, can argue you'd wanna grill Hitler on his motives & shed light on his twisted mind. Other hand, audience for his hate.
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) May 11, 2017
Plenty of people interviewed Hitler among many other haters … Hell, they’re still interviewing Hillary Clinton.
The fact that "it's news" doesn't seem to clear moral hurdle. But honestly, my own view on this eludes me.
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) May 11, 2017
Sure it does.
And certainly complicated by hyper partisanship, that one side's "hateful enemy of truth and freedom" is other side's hero
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) May 11, 2017
From the queen of hyper partisanship, EL OH EL.
Even more complicated by Trump. If gonna NOT give airtime to lying hatemongers, means not giving airtime to President of United States.
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) May 11, 2017
Recommended
THERE IT IS. Ok, so she doesn’t flat out say, “Trump is literally HITLER,” and instead goes on some bizarre moral media rant so she can passive aggressively compare the two and then pretend that’s not what she did.
Trump complicates Hitler? Hate? Stop it.
Well the lying hatemongers on the left sure get plenty of airtime.
— American – David (@Dcoxboomer) May 11, 2017
Ain’t that the truth?
Related:
Chelsea Clinton gets pissy when WOMEN disagree with tweet sent by organization pushing HER bookhttps://t.co/1qYdPZPkbf
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) May 11, 2017
Join the conversation as a VIP Member