Huh?
Please note Comey's grammar here. This phrasing confirms there were links between the Trump campaign and the Russian government. No "if." pic.twitter.com/f6Mpx3qgCc
— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) March 20, 2017
Where does he get this stuff?
We have read and re-read the statement that Keith seems to think includes a ‘GOTCHA,’ and we’re just not seeing any gotcha. Apparently he thinks the word “any” is relevant; guess when you’re desperate for something to be true you’ll create meanings of words and invent context.
From a legal – and grammatical – standpoint, this declares an investigation is taking place. Does not affirm anything more.
— hruby (@hrustar) March 20, 2017
And Comey said as much, there is an investigation taking place. Derp.
The nature of "any" links doesn't say there WERE links, but it doesn't say there weren't either. Encouraging, not conclusive
— Ken Goldman (@kengold) March 20, 2017
When even your own people are like, “Eh, not really Keith,” you know you’re reaching.
maybe – he does use 'whether' twice, though – staying tuned in.
— Doris Murdock (@DorisMurdock) March 20, 2017
So what? Should we pull Hillary’s server testimony and start nitpicking when she used the words “any” and “whether”?
Guys, this just comes off as desperate.
https://twitter.com/aurorapetrichor/status/843840197070487552
Is this another one of those ‘depends on what the definition of “is”, is’? *sigh*
Sounds like another nothingburger, Keith.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member