This. Can't. Be. Real. Seriously, Washington Post, you call THIS journalism?!

WHA?

Is your dog’s Halloween costume sexist?https://t.co/apcMic1FBl pic.twitter.com/scLaGwoYPV

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) September 29, 2016

what the hell is this?

— ? (@kabyr) September 29, 2016

Ya’ know, we’re not sure either.

shut the fuck up immediately @washingtonpost

— gucci pain (@summertimeflyy) September 29, 2016

*dying*

Oh and of course it just got worse.

My dogs is, and he's a transgender dog.

— My annoying page (@whitepage24) September 29, 2016

So wait, is gender fluid with dogs too? We can’t keep up with this crazy talk.

Is your newspaper serious?

— BAC1946 (@BAC19461946) September 29, 2016

No. No they’re not.

https://twitter.com/Apolocalypses/status/781550715185442816

In other words, RUN AWAAAAAAY!

https://twitter.com/thedcosta77/status/781554784046231552

Yes! Absolutely – so many Americans stay up every night worried that dogs are being dressed in sexist Halloween costumes.

For the love of Scooby Doo, your paper did not pay someone to write this. So many important issues; this ain't one of them.

— Anny B. (@64AnnyBug) September 29, 2016

And yet someone, somewhere feels validated because the Washington Post wrote this story. There’s a feminist out there doing a fist pump in solidarity with this paper for FINALLY bringing to light sexist dog costumes.