He's Finally Done It: Joe Biden Has Brought Unity … Sort of
Liberal White Women 'Are Just Really Into Hamas'
AP: American Catholic Church Sees 'An Immense Shift Toward the Old Ways'
Biden-Harris HQ Is Campaigning for Donald Trump Again
White Students Protesting Slavery or Something? Cynthia Nixon Loses it on Rep. Nadler...
Antisemitism? Cenk Uygur Goes on Epic Rant About Jewish Power Over Media and...
Michael Moore Tells CNN 98 Percent of Student Protesters 'Don't Believe in Antisemitism'
Twitchy Favorites Weigh in on the U.S. Taking in Palestinian Refugees
Wading Into the Debate Over the Importance of Stay at Home Mothers
'Stunningly Unwise': Pastor Deserves ALL the Heat for Saying PTSD Isn't Real
The Onion Hilariously Weighs in on the Campus Encampments
VIOLATING THE LAW: UCLA Protesters Use Wristbands to ID 'Anti-Israel' Students, Give Them...
KJP Reminds Journo Asking About Biden's Current Silence That He Spoke Out About...
Chris Hayes, Rolling Stone Writer Say These Student Protests Are Pretty Standard
Tissue? Columbia Prof Says Faculty Didn’t Approve of Police on Campus

Canada, just being Canada, will not charge criminals for killing pregnant victims' babies

(AP Photo/Teresa Crawford)

On Sunday, Steven Ertelt, the founder and editor for LifeNews, shared with us that the Canadian Parliament debated a new bill (Bill C-311) in June of 2023 that would have added harsher sentencing requirements for a criminal who killed or injured a pregnant woman versus one whose victim is not pregnant. It was debated twice, and ultimately voted down by a vote of 205-113, LifeNews reports.

Advertisement

Pregnant women are a high-risk demographic for violence perpetrated by an intimate partner, and this bill would have recognized that inherent risk for a vulnerable group and offered justice for those women and their pre-born children who are victimized - even those crimes that are not domestic violence.

The bill did see an uptick in the number of those who voted in favor, however. Those in favor of the bill totaled 113, versus 76 in 2016, which is encouraging.

That is a very fair point, they ARE being consistent in the way they devalue human life. Disgusting.

We're not sure Orwell could've even imagined something so depressing.

Advertisement

They're not trolling us at all, they're merely showing their true colors at this point. And when someone shows you who they really are, believe them.

All of this is simply a way to keep denying the humanity of our most vulnerable members of society in order to protect abortion 'rights'. Denying legal personhood to certain groups of humans has been done before, and we all know how horrifically THAT played out.

History may not always repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme. We have seen countless atrocities committed under the reasoning that 'they're not really PEOPLE!'

For something to be 'unconscionable', one must first have a conscience, and by all appearances, abortion advocates have had theirs surgically removed.

Advertisement

It's called a 'slippery slope' for good reason. Once you can deem one demographic as subhuman, it makes it much easier to advocate for their deaths, and it is not just the pre-born that are targeted anymore.

The author of the LifeNews article also included a link so you can send an email to specific MPs and petition them to take a stand for those who cannot stand for themselves. This kind of human rights abuse against unborn children has to end.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement