Debra Saunders, a conservative columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle, has posed a very interesting question that many Americans may be asking. If the same “consensus” that was unquestionably sure of a Hillary Clinton victory got that so wrong, how can a “consensus” of scientists be trusted when it comes to climate change?
If the overwhelming consensus was this wrong on 2016, why should voters accept it blindly on climate change?
— Debra J. Saunders (@debrajsaunders) November 13, 2016
The responses from the Left were immediate and unrestrained.
Stupid or trolling? https://t.co/WGG6AnS3h3
— Wil 'this account mocks fascists' Wheaton (@wilw) November 13, 2016
Stop trying folks, @debrajsaunders has already won Most Wilfully Uninformed Tweet of the Day. https://t.co/Ry3ApAUjSu
— Steve Silberman (@stevesilberman) November 13, 2016
You can't be this stupid, ma'am. https://t.co/bnfx0hgA9J
— Okay Comp-Boomer (@DocZeus) November 13, 2016
Dumbest. Tweet. Ever. @TMac024 @ManiacalKitten https://t.co/uM7iZ385av
— MEEZ (@TheRealBurmeez) November 13, 2016
The logic here is so incredibly dumb, I can't even find the words to argue against it https://t.co/KNy4EMIKC8
— bart (@bart_smith) November 13, 2016
Do people have to practice to be this stupid, or is it one of those Mozart things where it's like taking dictation from an idiot god? https://t.co/h5JZBO9GWG
— Lupus Haas (@Mobute) November 13, 2016
They tend to get panicky when their cover is blown.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member