Based: John Fetterman Says There Are Two Types of Protesters - Pro-Hamas and...
Reporter Asks KJP the PERFECT Follow-Up After She Again Claims 'the President Was...
Finally, the Truth! UCLA Protest Spokesperson Shows What Protests Are REALLY About
TikTok Trans Activists Are Now Talking About ‘Eight Person Trans Polycules’?
Hollaria Briden Takes Pro-Hamas Protester Hayley Becker to the WOODSHED With Hilarious Thr...
Boom! Meghan McCain Asserts Pro Palestine Demostration Images Will Help Trump Win Election
COLLUSION: Damning Thread Shows Plans for Campus Unrest Started in November
'Are You the Secretary?': Josh Hawley Makes a Fool of Interior Secretary Deb...
'UNREAL'! Biden Staff Continues to Ramp Up the '2024 Version of the Basement...
CHARGE! LOL! Video of Protesters Charging Cops Wearing Their 'GEAR' Funniest Damn Thing...
Video of Cringe UMass Protest Couple Circulates Twitter and the Replies Are Epic...
Kristi Noem Just Needs to Stop Digging and Go AWAY (I Said What...
Bret Baier Just Needs 1 Pic-Tweet to Make Biden and His Tone-Deaf Speech...
Here's the Totally Eco-Friendly Aftermath of the #UCLAProtest
MEOOOOW! Mueller, She Wrote Goes After Rebekah Jones for Saying She WON'T Vote...

Dear blue checks criticizing Trump over his NYT-North Korea tweet: You know South Korea said it first, right?

There’s a lot … and we mean a lot … of blue checks angry at this tweet from President Donald Trump where he says a New York Times report on “North Korea developing missile bases is inaccurate” and that “we fully know about the sites being discussed, nothing new”:

Advertisement

And do you know who agrees with the president that this report from CSIS Beyond Parallel is “nothing new”? South Korea, that’s who:

From Yonhap:

South Korea’s presidential office on Tuesday played down a new report on North Korea’s “undisclosed” missile sites, saying the state intelligence communities of South Korea and the United States earlier acquired relevant information.

Cheong Wa Dae added that it’s going too far to call the North’s continued activity a “great deception” given that it has no specific agreement to dismantle or disclose the facilities mentioned in the report issued by Beyond Parallel, a group at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

Advertisement

And:

Speaking about the report, Cheong Wa Dae spokesman Kim Eui-kyeom pointed out that the source of the analysis of the Sakkanmol base is a commercial satellite.

“The intelligence authorities of South Korea and the U.S. have far more detailed information from military satellites and are closely monitoring (it),” Kim said.

He said the facilities have nothing to do with intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) or intermediate-range ballistic missiles (IRBMs).

He took issue with a related New York Times report headlined, “In North Korea, Missile Bases Suggest a Great Deception.”

The North has not promised to shut down the base, and there has been no accord or negotiations in connection with it, he stressed.

Rather, Kim said, the existence of such a missile site shows the need for talks with North Korea to get rid of its military threats.

FWIW, here’s the actual report the NYT based its reporting on:

***

Related:

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement