President Biden Blasts 'Hateful Rhetoric' From Pro-Israel Demonstrators at Columbia
Alarming: Fire Marshal Jamaal Bowman Hilariously Duped by Pro-Hamas Twitter Parody Account
'Absolutely Incredible!' Julie Kelly Shares Unsealed Detail From Trump 'Classified Doc' Ca...
President Joe Biden Promises He Will Not Rest Until All American Hostages Are...
Trump-Hating Psychiatrist Proves She Needs a Civics Course While Opining About SCOTUS
Kristi Noem Needs More Courageous Advisers
WHOOPSIES: Emory University Professor Who Was Tackled by Police Confesses to Assaulting Of...
Biden Sees Economy 'Through the Eyes of Scranton and Working People' (Not THESE...
Russel Brand: From Raunchy to Redeemed
Bill Maher as the 'Voice of Reason' on the Left Continues to be...
'It's Not a Safe Place' Says Former Fed Prosecutor Who Was Punched in...
The New York Times EMBARRASSES Themselves in an Attempt to Cover for Lying...
Being Conservative Is the NEW Punk Rock and Biden's Interview With Stern Proves...
White House Down: Biden Aides Attempted to OUST Press Secretary KJP, Fail Because...
'I Love This Trooper!' No Nonsense Officer Shows How to Efficiently Remove a...

Charles C.W. Cooke busts Mother Jones for 'Underwear Gnomes' type headline on guns

There’s an old episode of “South Park” where the kids encounter “Underpants Gnomes” who have a scheme to get rich. Phase 1 of the plan is that the gnomes steal underpants. Phase 2 is blank. But Phase 3 is profit. Simple, right? Well, as long as don’t worry too much about what exactly happened in Phase 2 to make Phase 3 possible:

Advertisement

Well, some Underpants Gnomes seem to be writing headlines for Mother Jones. Notice how there’s a huge gap between these two sentences?

That’s because Phase 2, in this case, was an ill-advised lawsuit against the gun dealer, as National Review Online’s Charles C.W. Cooke so rightly points out:

Anger should be directed at the attorney that let her file the lawsuit knowing that this outcome was most likely. From Mother Jones:

There was one experience that showed us, more than any other, how warped America’s relationship with gun violence is. It came when we decided to sue the dealer that armed our daughter’s killer. The gunman bought more than 4,000 rounds of ammunition before his shooting spree—no background check, no questions asked. But a judge dismissed our case. Gun dealers are shielded by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, a controversial law that protects them from liability when crimes are committed with their products.

No blame for the lawyers, or the Brady Campaign that put her up to it:

Advertisement

Even some anti-gun folks are objecting to the piece:

https://twitter.com/alexgould17/status/888115491163611138

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement