When 'WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN' Amidst the California Wildfires Goes Shockingly Wrong
'Climate Change has a FACE' - James Woods OBLITERATES the Climate Change Cult...
Demented Democrat Pramila Jayapal Blames the Golden Arches for the Golden State’s Wildfire...
Greg Gutfeld to LA Mayor Karen Bass: ‘You Can’t Fight Fire with Platitudes,...
DEI Literally Dangerous! Female LA Firefighter Blames Victims if She Lacks Skills and...
CNN Analyst Thinks Trump's Comments on Wildfires 'Could Impede Effective Response'
Arson Arrest: Police Detain Man Suspected of Setting a Fire in the Kenneth...
Professor Finds in Wildfire Video a Metaphor for ‘Fossil Fuel Driven, Neoliberal Capitalis...
Sen. John Fetterman Accepts Trump’s Invitation to Meet at Mar-a-Lago
California Lawmakers Spend Day ‘Trump-Proofing’ State Against Litigation
WaPo’s Philip Bump Says Far-Right’s Lies About Wildfires Are Just Like 2020 Election...
BURNED: After L.A. Wildfires, Voters Need to Stop Letting Democrats Fail Upwards
Jemele Hill Throws Hissy Fit at Matt Walsh for Stating the Obvious About...
Woman Says Everyone Who Follows Libs of TikTok ‘Should Be Put Down’
PANIC: Axios in Absolute MELTDOWN Mode Over New Facebook Policy That Lets People...

AOC slaps back at Green New Deal critics with SpongeBob photo, gets REALITY CHECKED by JP Morgan Asset Management

Democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez posted this photo of an undersea bubble from the cartoon SpongeBob and said this is how critics of her Green New Deal will respond to global warming:

Advertisement

Wait, is this a thing we’ve missed from libs?

And to answer her in a format she can understand, here are a few cartoons of our own. Watch your wallet when it comes time to pay for the GND:

Just back away:

Anyway, maybe critics of her Green New Deal are just slightly more advanced than that? Here’s what J.P. Morgan Asset Management has to say about it: “Green New Deal goals are not in the realm of the possible, that they do not appear grounded in existing scholarship on energy de-carbonization.”

Advertisement

And it’s, at best, “a slogan to galvanize support for change. At worst it’s “a sign of how little work its proponents have done” and “not a useful foundation for serious policy discussion”:

So, she’s basically a science-denier, right? That’s how this works?

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement