Cop Says 3-Foot Petting Zoo Donkey HeeHaw ‘Charged’ Him, So He Shot the...
Holdout Won't Budge in Clancy Trial; Judge Calls Mistrial, Defense Asks High Court...
NYC Assembly Socialist Has the Most Insane Suggestion of All Time for How...
‘Limited by Their Experience’: James Talarico Explains Why Straight White People Have 'Bli...
Scott Jennings Feels Bad for Jasmine Crockett … CNN Panelist Acts Like He...
American Heroes of 9/11: Betty Ong
Pearl Clutching Over the Latest About US Strikes on Drug Boats Spotlights Dems'...
A Decade Later, Colin Kaepernick Still Recasting a Bench-Warming Pout As Civil Rights...
Wacky MI Dem Nominee Wrote Songs Hoping Manchin Would 'Hurry Up and Die'...
'The 1980s' Continues to Trend on X As Users Mock Ryan Reynolds and...
'Impeach Trump' Dem Candidate for US House Asked to Name the Charges (Then...
Jim Acosta and Hunter Biden Bond Over Their Irrelevance and Hatred of Scott...
Science Journal Nature Says the Death of Fabulist Jason Arday 'Must Prompt Deep...
Scuzzy Documentarian Rips Elon Musk: Momma Musk and Others Respond
Police Say Immigrant Who Killed Two Antifa Members Was Hunting Gay Men

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement