The Two Jakes: Tapper Finally Mentions the Fauci Diary on CNN but Not...
Chris Rufo Exposes California Program That Gives Taxpayer-Funded Meth Pipes to the Homeles...
Scold News: Five Years Ago, Fauci Chum Chuck Todd Was Lecturing the Vaccine-Hesitant...
James Carville Says Fauci Is an Honest Guy Who Made No Mistakes and...
John Cleese Says He’s Being ‘Ritually Humiliated’ as a Racist for Supporting Rupert...
Toy Box Doc: Brandon Gill Asks X If James Talarico Still Plays With...
Gov. Tim Walz of All People Tells Elon Musk, ‘See You in Court,...
Agitators in Madison Use Boards With Nails to Defend Their BLM Encampment, and...
Fully Vaxxed. Promised Protection, And Still They’re Rewriting What Fauci, Biden & the...
Rolling Stone: We’re No Closer to Getting to the Origin of the COVID...
Good Question: Will NYC Residents Need to Show ID to Shop at City-Run...
TMZ’s Harvey Levin Calls Fauci Attacks ‘Heartbreaking,’ McCarthy-Like
David Axelrod Races to Defend Fauci After He Pleads the Fifth on Everything—Even...
Dem Sen. Andy Kim Feting Dr. Fauci Was a Deranged Political Version of...
Bulwark's Correspondent Confirms MS NOW's Theory That Fauci Hearing Was a Show Trial

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement