Harpies Bizarre: Psaki and Welch Screech Over Scott Pelley’s Firing - Maddow Wants...
Pro-Choice Woman Compares Fetuses to Tapeworms
Sunny Hostin: MAGA ‘Despicable’ for Electing Trump but Now Says Dems MUST Vote...
Jim Acosta Says He Was Accused of Showboating and Making Himself the Story...
Chef José Andrés Shown the Dinner Menu at ICE Detention Facility Where Hunger...
Polymarket: Democratic Socialist Nithya Raman Has Surged to Second Place in LA Mayoral...
Soulless: Jill Biden Snubs Hunter’s Daughter Navy in Memoir Dedicated to Her Other...
Woman Demanding $10 Million for ‘Severe Emotional Distress’ After ICE 'Exposed Her Buttock...
UFC Freedom 250: CNN’s Sara Sidner Implies Trump’s a Dictator Since Benito Mussolini...
The Face That Launched a Thousand Scowls: Trump Publicly Diagnoses Kaitlan's Terminal Trum...
THEY MAD: SCOTUS Rules Alabama Can Use Map Lower Court Judge Called ‘Intentionally...
'Why Is She Leaving? I Want to Answer Her Questions!' Marco Rubio ROASTS...
Sunrise Movement Ditches Climate Change for Anti-Semitic Pro-Palestine Priorities
Ohio State Senator ‘Almost Brought to Tears’ by Hateful Rhetoric Against Somalis
Rep. Shri Thanedar Gets Cooked by Markwayne Mullin Over ‘Racist’ DHS Social Media...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement