Fran Lebowitz Helps Mamdani's NYC Revitalization Push by Telling Billionaires They're Not...
GOP Voters Are RINO Hunting
Chris Rufo Strikes Again! Karen Bass Loves Homeless Drug Addicts So Much, She's...
Newsom and Jeffries Realize They Can't Stop Trump's Plan to Crush Democrats
'Shattered Fundraising Records'! Dems' Unhinged Rhetoric Is Working Out Great... for the N...
A 'YUGE' Endorsement: Trump Comes Out in Support of Spencer Pratt, Slams Clown...
WaPo Stomps on a Rake While Alleging Another Outlet's 'Contentious Layoffs' and 'Dwindling...
Joyce Carol Oates Calls Bluesky an ‘Upscale Mall’ — Conservatives Say That’s Exactly...
Dem Sen. Gillibrand Told Sean Duffy She'd Never Flown on Private Jets but...
Carlson Urges Massie to Heroically Name Epstein Names; Replies: ‘Remember What Happened La...
Dem Adviser: What Platner Bragged About Doing Makes Him More Relatable (Apparently Liz...
Former U.S. Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts, Key Architect of Dodd-Frank Act, Dies...
Dem Senate Candidate Graham Platner Mocked Purple Heart Hero: 'Dumb [Expletive] Didn’t Des...
A Glance at Some of the People Upset Thomas Massie Lost Speaks Volumes
It's a Cringe-Off! Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker Battle Each Other for WORST...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement