LET'S EFFING GO! Jesse Waters UNLOADS on Jessica Tarlov for Shaming Trump Supporters...
Tulsi Gabbard Drops Receipts on Obama After His Projection About Trump Targeting Political...
This SPECTACULAR Moment Right Here Is When Spencer Pratt Officially WON the LA...
The LOST Jedi: Mark Hamill Takes Trump DERANGEMENT to Creepy NEW Low in...
SOME Media Outlets Aren't Ignoring This Detail About FBI's Lucas Probe (but Other...
THIS! Ex-Muslim Iranian Woman SHREDS Megyn Kelly for Her Latest Anti-Israel BLATHER and...
Soros-Backed Fairfax Co. DA Gets Ratioed Over His 'Values' After DOJ Launches Civil...
Pratt CRUSHES It: Mayoral Debate Poll Bloodbath Leaves LA Dems in Meltdown Mode...
SERIOUSLY!? Newsom Press Office's Lego Dig at Trump's WH Ballroom Derailed Quickly
Spencer Pratt Issues a Challenge in LA Mayoral Debate That Nithya Raman Will...
The Inn-Crowd: Jim Acosta Speaks at Montana Hotel, Tells Dem Fundraisers He’s Doing...
Disappointed Dem: Obama Tells Stephen Colbert That He’s Very ‘Worried About the Republican...
A Sad Couple of Balls: Jeff Bezos' Tacky Ball Versus The Regular Met...
Prime Minister Kier Starmer Encourages Everyone to Vote Labour, the Party That’s on...
LA Raw: Mayoral Candidate Who Promises to Fix Homelessness Failed at Fixing...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos