Curdling Scheme: Dem Jamie Raskin’s ‘No Illegal Alien Voters’ Claim Has Aged Like...
Double Dribble: Unhinged Sport Journalist Dumps on Caitlin Clark Because Emmett Till or...
Left-Field Lament: Gov. Gavin Newsom Moans About Sports Being Infected With Politics
Jake Tapper: CNN Has Posted the Video Version of the Chaos and Coverups...
AP: Trans Aid Workers in Nepal Turn to Sex Work After USAID Cuts...
CNN: Trump Has Activated a Never-Used 'Secretive Court' for Deporting ‘Alien Terrorists’
Jasmine Crockett Welcomes Witnesses to the Republican Party's 'Great Replacement Therapy S...
The AWFLs and Boomers Are Singing Again, This Time Performing 'Hit the Road,...
No, NDAA Section 219 Doesn’t Merge the U.S. and Israeli Militaries — Here’s...
Jamaican National Working as Southwest Flight Attendant Arrested by ICE After Years-Long O...
Mamdani Tells Jon Stewart They’d Be Slandered for Introducing Buildings That Lend Books...
Pint-Sized RI Rep. Enrique Sanchez Vows Biblical Payback on ICE for Deporting His...
Bombshell Biden Memo: Not So Temporary TPS to Shield Illegals & Trap Trump...
Black Lives Matter Protests Break Out in WI Where Man Who Stabbed Cop...
Epic Meltdowns: Hollywood Screams As Elon Musk Vows to Make Accurate AI Version...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement