Martyr Makeover: MS NOW Alters Pretti Photo to Transform the Late Nurse Into...
Bros and Ros: Over-the-Top Leftist’s Lengthy Lecture to Khanna Is All ‘Pimp’ and...
Dem Angie Craig Sees Weak Republicans As Her Cue to Talk Tough on...
Illiterate, Sniveling Buffoon Nick Shirley’s Fraudulent Videos Have Gotten People Killed
Fake But Accurate: Journos and Other Assorted Propagandists Run With AI Enhanced Pretti...
Woman Claims ‘Real Masculinity’ Is Fleeing the Right
'Lying Oxygen Thieves' of Climate Defiance Branch Out From Climate Insanity to Anti-Ice...
Bill Kristol: There Was No ‘Unrest’ in Minneapolis Until ICE and CBP Showed...
Friend Murdered by Feds—Send Coffee Money: X Users Slam Doctor's Venmo Plea After...
Nurse Says He Won’t Give Anesthesia to Republicans Undergoing Surgery
The Left's Real Motivation: Not Loving Illegals, Just Despising Popular Kids Who Shoved...
Don't Buy the Martyr Myth: Pretti and Good Chose Confrontation with Law Enforcement
NY Gov. Kathy Hochul Posts a Video With Her Pro Tips on Shoveling...
Moms Trading Playdates for Bulletproof Vests: 'Protecting' Kids by Using Them as...
Minneapolis Insurrection Proves It: If Trump Blinks on ICE, the Left Wins Open...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement