Politico Unsure What or Who Is Fueling a Surge of Threats on SCOTUS...
'Something Is OFF': Here's Why X Doesn't Think Pete Buttigieg's CPS Targeting His...
Here's the Blog of WACKO SF Guy Who Attacked Scott Wiener for Being...
Miranda Devine Spots EXACTLY Who the Dem Party Needs More of Heading Into...
OOF, Democrats Are in DEEEEEP Trouble: Chris Murphy Just Proved Socialist Democrats Own...
Briahna Joy Gray's Israel Gay Marriage Gotcha Backfires Spectacularly
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Wallace and Vomit: MS NOW Host Regurgitates the Laughable Lie That Obama’s Presidency...
Safe at Home: DHS Sec. Markwayne Mullin Explains to CNN's Jake Tapper Why...
Woke CA Teacher Brags About Marrying Gaza Resident Online for Green Card —...
Far-Left Sends Elite Prep School Socialist Oliver Larkin to Primary Jared Moskowitz (Becau...
DeWine Intervention: Ohio Governor Tells CNN’s Jake Tapper Why He's Against Sending ‘Temp’...
Dem Raphael Warnock: Socialists and Communists Are Welcome Under His Party’s ‘Big Tent’...
Tweet Makes a Point About the Consequences of Socialism
No Money for Schools? Mary Katharine Ham Schools the Commie on NYC's $40K-Per-Student...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement