From Human Traffickers to Terrorists: The Convict Parents of the Left’s Loudest ‘Anti-Rich...
Homophobia Is Bad … Except When It’s Against Conservatives: Kimmel’s Cringe WHCD Stand-In...
Is This Photo Purporting to Show Trump Fast Asleep in the WH Real...
Falklands Fallout: US Tells Britain to 'Falk Off' After Iran Snub – Piers...
Rep. Brandon Gill Blows Up Spectrum’s Scooter Love Story: Rep. Min’s Real Reason...
We Are So Back: DOJ Revives Firing Squad as 'Most Dignified' Execution Method
Hasan Piker: Trust-Fund Trotsky Who Encourages Felonies While Melting Down Over His My...
Cory Booker Is Worried Trump Will Seize Media Control Now That Democrats Are...
The Blind Spot: Blue Collar Workers Fund Comfortable Bureaucrats, Then Get Lectures on...
Chris Cuomo: DOJ Is ‘Helping the Bad Guys’ by Targeting the SPLC for...
FINALLY! WaPo Announces Bernie Sanders' New Initiative to Reach Leftists on College Campus...
This Damning Segment on the SPLC Is Just 1 Reason Dems Are Melting...
NASA’s Missing Scientists Mystery Is Getting Way Too Real
John Harwood Gets Introduced to Himself After Questioning the Objectivity of a CBS...
Trump Made Sure Schumer Will NEVER Recover From That Mistake

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement