A Black Life Didn't Matter to BLM/Anti-FA: Family Wins ~$30 Million Dollars in...
Mom of Bilingual Family Tapes Passports to Their Foreheads in Powerful Statement
Stand With ICE
Patronizing Beta Male and Senate Hopeful Assumes Women Are Stupid
Daily Beast: ‘Leading Catholic Newspaper’ Slams JD Vance for Putting MAGA Over Jesus
In Response to Gov. Mills' Nonsense, Douglass Mackey Drops the REAL George Washington...
Jasmine Crockett: Trump Wants to Target 'Anybody Who Has a Little Bit of...
Pelosi: Trump's Statements About Ilhan Omar 'Reflect a Disturbing Lack of Understanding of...
Shocked in 2021, Still Shocked in 2026: Hospitals Haven't Changed, and Recent Insane...
Cornel West Explains on CNN What It Means to ‘N****rize’ a Whole Country
FAKE, FAKE, FAKE! Ilhan Omar LOSES It When Asked Why She Didn't Follow...
Nurse Who Said He'd Deny Conservatives Anesthesia During Surgery Loses License
Man Impersonates FBI Agent, Says He Has a Court Order (and Pizza Cutter)...
‘Batman’ Demands Santa Clara City Council Find a Spine and Do Something About...
Anti-Ice Activists Surround Restaurant After Mistaking TSA Officers for Federal Agents

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement