Sonny Hostin Says Her Kids Have Fewer Civil Rights Since SCOTUS Ended Race-Based...
Maine Kampf: Bernie Sanders Gives Dem Senate Hopeful Graham Platner His Socialist Seal...
JK Rowling Reacts to Two Jews Wounded in London Stabbing Attack by Somali-Born...
Judge Halves Rapist’s Sentence Noting He’s an African American Male Who’s ‘Experienced Thi...
Texas Judge Clears Way for Work to Resume on Muslim-Centric EPIC City
Report: Planned Parenthood Used Codeword ‘Benghazi’ to Hide Millions in PPP Loans
DeSantis 'Scared' of Marc Elias? Florida's Shifted 20 Points Red and the Court...
Democrats Deliver: PA House Democrats Pass Bill Banning Whites-Only Housing
Jonathan Turley Lists Ways Dems Are Patriotically Ushering in America's 250th Anniversary
Fatah Officials Accuse IDF of Training Rats to Attack Palestinian Children
MeidasTouch Correspondent Reports on Saturday Night’s ‘Dinner Incident’
Libs Like Keith Olbermann Debate the Real Meaning of '86', Insist It's Not...
'He Should Withdraw the Statement, IMMEDIATELY!' — Trump Hammers Jeffries for Calling SCOT...
Jasmine Crockett Calls Wheelchair-Bound Gov. Abbott a 'DEI Hire' — 'A Tree Made...
Jim Acosta Starts Ticking After Learning 60 Minutes Edited Down Trump’s Interview

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement