Cool Use for ChatGPT Is Not Cool at All; Justine Bateman Scolds
Nicholas Kristof Takes Thousand-Mile Road Trip to Find Woman With Six Cents in...
Muslim Oxford Union President Tells Islam Critics That Without Security, They’d Be ‘Cooked...
Spaniard: All of the Conservatives Laughing at the Invasion of Spain Are Heartless...
David Frum Looks at COVID Deaths in ‘Red America’ and Asserts Fauci Is...
A ‘Scared’ Jonah Goldberg Unloads on ‘Poseur’ Hasan Piker
Federal Judge Again Blocks Trump Administration From Ending TPS for Somalis
What’s Up Dox?: Scott Galloway Is Mad Mamdani Painted a Target on Him...
Not-a-Communist Melat Kiros Notes Some Big-Tent Democrats Call Themselves Capitalists
Friendship of Fools: Chris Cuomo Defends His Good Pal Fauci After Silent COVID...
Relish the Thought: FCC Chairman Points Out Legacy Media Is Less Trusted Than...
Scott Jennings Shares Three Reasons GOP Could Survive the Midterms Despite Bungling Trump’...
Rand Paul Takes a Stroll Down Memory Lane With an Enraging Fauci vs....
Kamala Harris Just Made It Obvious the Dems Know They Can't Win on...
GOP Candidate for WI Gov Promises Not to Cancel Thanksgiving, Unlike His Unhinged...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement