Angry Staffer Derps AGAIN! Claims MAGA Influencers Have Super SECRET Chat Where Trump...
MAZE's 'Beautiful, 4-Part Story' Starring Stephen Colbert Is Like a Greek Tragedy Except...
She's Gonna BLOW! Leigh McGowen Suffers Psychotic BREAK on CNN Panel Talking About...
The Bad, the Ugly, the Absolute CORRUPT: HERE Is What Really Went Down...
Holy COPE, Batman! Dolt Morgan J Freeman Uses Grok to 'Prove' Red States...
'Democrats Just Dropped a New Pro-Spencer Pratt Ad' in L.A. (They Say This...
Minnesota Dems Brag About Creating an Office to Aggressively Go After Fraud and...
John Fetterman SHUTS Donna Brazile Down for Attacking the Trump Admin 'Going to...
Cameron Kasky Tries Telling Scott Jennings How He Can and CAN'T Talk and...
Gavin Newsom's Press Office Is Trying to Do a Clean Up in the...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Stomp and Circumstance: Cosplaying Dem Justin Pearson Does ‘Praise Dance’ During Graduatio...
Pete Hegseth Has Thoughts About Sen. Mark Kelly 'Blabbing on TV' About Supposed...
LA Mayoral Hopeful Spencer Pratt Is the Anti-Mamdani, Supports Poopless, Stab-Free Public...
Economic Analysis: Wages Are Not Behaving

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement