Platner Campaign Posts Video of Dem Candidate's Wife Making a Fresh 'Clean Up...
Woman Fired After Praying to ‘MAGA Lord Jesus’ to Make Pam Bondi’s Throat...
Scott Wiener Asks Who Would Campaign by Demonizing Children Who Just Want to...
WaPo: Pentagon Moving to Recruit Hundreds of Troops to Be Spectators at White...
New Yorker: In Nation of MAGA Hats, ‘Patriotism Just Isn’t Cool Anymore’
CBS News: Jill Biden Supported Hunter’s Pardon Because She Didn’t Want Him in...
Scar Issue: Dems ‘Forget’ Biden's Post-Op Topless Trans Activists at WH While Blasting...
DHS Secretary Ratioed for Thanking NJ Governor for Her Cooperation in Restoring Law...
Atlantic Drops 'Do Better Than Platner' Bomb as Shipwreckedcrew Warns: DNC Prepping Anothe...
Rioters Dismantle the ‘First Amendment Barriers’ Set Up by New Jersey State Police
Dem Senate Hopeful Graham Platner’s Wife Flagged His Sexually Explicit Texts With Other...
The Bulwark's Tim Miller Asks for More Posts About James Talarico's Hot Vegan...
Here's a Hilarious Detail About Who Runs the 'Nonpartisan' Texas Polling Firm Showing...
Left Loses it Over Hegseth Wife Workout With Troops — Forgets Jill’s Cabinet...
David Axelrod Spots a 'Hilarious Turn of Events' in TX Senate Race (and...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos