CNN Legal Analyst Says Latest Minneapolis ICE Shooting Video Doesn’t Support Self-Defense...
Fanning the Flames: AOC Lies That JD Vance Supports ICE Agents Assassinating Americans...
Why Is the Western Legacy Media Ignoring Iran? A Rhetorical Question
Terrifying Road Risk: Over Half of North Carolina's Immigrant Trucker Licenses Ruled Illeg...
Democrats' New Low: Doctored Clip Turns Violent Car Attack on ICE Officer into...
Shouting F-Bombs at ICE Didn't Work: Minneapolis Gets 1,000 Extra Border Patrol as...
Jesus Loves Them, But Someone Needs to Arrest These Insane Women Impeding ICE
Nebraska State Senator Says She 'Didn't Look' While Tearing Down Founders' Portraits –...
Jon Favreau's Eyeballs Have Officially Ghosted Him As He Misses the ICE Officer...
MS NOW Reporter Asks Why ICE Officer Was Filming After New Video Busts...
Karening Intensifies: Deranged Activism: Woman Abandons Young Child in Car to Interfere wi...
Sounds Like Sedition: Philadelphia Sheriff Claims ICE Is Not 'Real' Law Enforcement, Promi...
Code Pink's New MVP: MTG – She Didn't Just Recommend the Restaurant ......
Jack Smith Trampled Trump's First Amendment Rights... Says the Washington Post?! Wait, WHA...
Woke Losers Infighting Over Renee Good: 'Say Her Name' Forbidden Because White Allies...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement