Try and Make Sense of Hakeem Jeffries' Dueling Narratives About Ron DeSantis' Florida...
CNN Cuts CLIP of Democrat RIGHT Before He Fantasizes About Executing Pete Hegseth...
Elizabeth Warren's Effort to Convince Americans SCOTUS Crushed Their Right to Vote Gets...
Unleash HELL! Smug Harvard Prof Goes After Ben Sasse About Babies and WOW,...
'Lost': MS NOW Asked Young WI Peeps to Describe the Democratic Party in...
JB Pritzker Trips Over a Stack of Maps While Slamming SCOTUS' Racial Gerrymandering...
PULVERIZED! Scott Jennings BLISTERS CNN Analyst Claiming GOP Would NEVER Elect a Black...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett Is One the Most Powerful People in the Country So...
BREAKING: Maine Gov. Janet Mills Suspending Her Candidacy for the U.S. Senate (Statement)
AOC Goes Straight Fatal-Attraction NUTS When Lee Zeldin Says He's Done With Her...
OOF! Stephen A. Smith's Poll About Violent Political Rhetoric Does NOT GO WELL...
'They Not Like Us': Spencer Pratt's New Campaign Ad for LA Mayoral Race...
Cowntraversy: Google Street Values Your Privacy, if You're a Cow
A Murder of Jim Crows: Schumer and Dems Ignorantly Invoke Segregation Laws As...
WaPo: White House Ballroom Will Set in Stone Trump’s ‘Regal Conception of the...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos