Former DNC Vice Chair David Hogg Says There's No Room for Moderates in...
Democracy Dimwit: DSA Co-Chair Cannot Explain What ‘Taxing the Hell Out of Millionaires’...
Jemele Hill’s Dishonest Spin on Trans Athletes: The Fight for Girls’ Sports Is...
Bernie Coaches Baby Socialists: Keep the Real Agenda Quiet Until After You’ve Fooled...
Patients Who? Nurses Ditch the Sick to Stage a Walkout After ICE Grabs...
Mental Loop Lunacy: Hillary Clinton Still Hasn’t Gotten Over Her 2016 Presidential Debate...
Marriage on ICE: ‘Lifelong Republican’ Shocked to Learn Immigration Laws Apply to His...
Dr. Robert Malone Puts Fauci's Wife and the NIH on BLAST After She...
Half Woman by Birth Canal, Full WNBA Prospect by Declaration: Enes Freedom Enters...
'I Hate Mackinac': Michigan Senate Hopeful Abdul El-Sayed Prefers Dubai Over America’s Cro...
Bombshell Trump Interview Confirm Trump Understands Everything About 2026
It Must Be Pretty Good: Ben Shapiro's New Movie Trailer Has Infuriated ALL...
Wait... WUT? Marjorie Taylor Greene Declares Trump 'the Past,' Lectures Conservatives on C...
'Grouchy FAUCI' —> Fauci's Wife the EPITOME of Class As She Does THIS...
YIKES: Francesca Hong's Clapback at David Axelrod's 'Faculty Lounge Exotica' Dig Takes AWK...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos