Ex DOJ Official Tells CNN the Comey Indictment Is the Worst Case Ever...
Fraud Alert: Mallory McMorrow Deletes Thousands of Tweets Trashing Michigan While Running...
Dorkiest Assassin EVER: WHCD Shooter Takes Cringe Mirror Selfie, Gears Up Like John...
Chris Cillizza Says Trump Wants to Make James Comey's Life Miserable for As...
Instead of Addressing Sasse’s Call to Value Kids Over Dopamine, American Humanist Editor...
Heartstrings Over Hard Facts: NBC Turns Illegal Congolese Migrants (Denied Asylum Twice) I...
Bill Kristol’s Brutal 2026 Wake-Up Call: He and The Bulwark Are Completely Irrelevant
Toxic Spreadsheets! In Another Resurfaced Clip, AOC Proves That She Can Still Out-Stupid...
Rep. McBride's Great Gaffe-by: Can't Pick a Gender, Drops an F-Bomb, and Still...
Limousine Leeches: Sec. Brooke Rollins Drops a BOMBSHELL About People Who Are Receiving...
Short Supply: Stephanopoulos Has ‘Little Patience’ for Those Blaming Dem Rhetoric for Poli...
Weighing Words: Dem Dan Goldman Pivots From Eliminating Trump to Dialing Down Dangerous...
MN Dems Propose Cutting Aid to Cities That Don’t Fly ‘New’ State Flag
UnitedHealthcare Social Media Manager Upset That WHCD Assassin Missed
Ro Khanna Weeps for 'Students in Fear' of ICE — Ignores US Kids...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement