CA Attorney General Seeks 'Independent Content Monitoring of CNN' Under Paramount Merger
Unglued Awakening: Jessica Tarlov Shocked to Learn Conservatives Treat Her Better Than Far...
Lady Gaga Had a Baby at a Great Hospital — ‘Free Palestine’ Losers...
Program to Help Businesses Hurt by Operation Metro Surge Shut Down Due to...
Gas Prices Hurt and Sneering at Working Families Doesn’t Help
Kaitlan Collins Calls CNN White House Ban an ‘Illegal Assault’ on Their Constitutional...
Abdul El-Sayed Got Heightmogged by an Average Sized Female State Rep. and Became...
Jessica Tarlov Saying Dems Are on the Side of Sanity Nearly Made Bill...
Good Samaritan Tells Reporter Near the White House How CNN Can Get Its...
Converse-Troversy! Washington Post Tries to 'Sneak' in Some Race Rage Over Shoe Ad
Remember When Brian Stelter Asked If Fox News Should Lose WH Access and...
'It's Two Letters': Scott Presler Hauls Out a Kamala Classic As the Debate...
Self-Proclaimed 'Cis Gender Woman' Tells J.K. Rowling She Can't CHOOSE Who's a Woman...
Video Compilations End CNN's Screeching About the WH Ban and 'Fair and Accurate...
She's Still GOING: Sue O'Connell Straight-Up UNHINGED, Continues Picking Fights With X Ove...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos