Marc Elias Continues Multi-Day MELTDOWN Screeching He WON'T Tone It Down Because Trump...
And. Here. We. Go! FBI and HSI Raiding 20+ Minneapolis, MN Locations Including,...
WHOA: Deep Dive Into Cole Allen's Social Media Shows TROUBLING Posts About Butler...
'Finished Once and For ALL'! Democrats Sent Out CRAZY Fundraising Email RIGHT After...
Purple and Painful: Lee Zeldin DEMOLISHES Rosa DeLauro On SCOTUS Law and the...
'JuSt A lIGhT rOaSt!' Jimmy Kimmel Face-Plants SPECTACULARLY Defending Trump Assassination...
Dem Identity of WHCD Shooting Suspect Triggers Legacy Media Pivot to Tired False...
Woman Claims Somalis Built the Economy and Soul of Minnesota
MS NOW’s Ken Dilanian Claims Mainstream Dem WHCD Shooting Suspect Is a Far-Left...
Dana Bash Wishes Rupar Hadn’t Cut Her Question About Trump Calling Press the...
President Trump Endorses Changing ICE’s Name to NICE
'You Can’t Touch Jimmy': Jake Tapper's Defense of Kimmel's Sick Melania Joke Draws...
Hakeem Jeffries Is BIG MAD That Karoline Leavitt Got DIRECTLY Over the Target...
Jay Jones 2.0: Ana Navarro Says Trump Now Knows the Fear of Schoolchildren...
Simp Pines for Biden’s ‘No Drama’ Days — Forgets Afghanistan, Inflation, Open Borders,...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement