Kristi Noem Obliterates Tim Walz and His Projection About the Trump Admin Wasting...
OOPS! New Poll of Venezuela's Neighbors Shows a SLIGHTLY Different Reaction to Maduro's...
Jasmine Crockett Compares Trump to Maduro As She Observes the Dems’ J6 Holiday...
Tapper Asks Mark Kelly What Soldiers Should’ve Done Since Dems Are Calling Trump’s...
Tim Walz Laughably Claims Those Who Defraud New MN Paid Leave Plan Will...
Move Over, Quality Learing Center: Here's the Somali Education and Resource Center
San Francisco Reparations Committee Submits 100-Point Plan Ron DeSantis Calls 'The Woke Mi...
WaPo: Trump Didn’t Back Venezuelan Opposition Leader Over Jealousy Over Nobel Peace Prize
NYC’s New Tenant Advocate Thinks Public Schools Should Be ‘Sites of Resistance’ Against...
Classy Melania Trump Hates Her Husband's Dancing, Impression of Trans Weightlifters
Michael Reagan Conservative Author, Radio Host and Son of President Ronald Reagan, has...
Colombian Ambassador Thanks China and Russia for Supporting Emergency UN Meeting on Venezu...
'Out of Your Mind': Adams Condemns Mamdani's Housing Pick for Linking Homeownership to...
Sen. Ruben Gallego Says Ashli Babbitt Died Trying to Kill Cops and Elected...
The Fraud Investigation of Cali Has Begun: Trump Takes Aim at 'New-scum' Amid...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement