To and Fro: Dem Justin Pearson Dodges Questions From Scott Jennings About His...
NewsNight Smite: Podcaster Megyn Kelly Rips CNN’s Abby Phillip With a Spot-On Vocal...
Dem Gavin Newsom Claims He Can’t Vote If the SAVE Act Passes Because...
Oh No! 'Review-Bombing Starfleet Academy Could End the Franchise'
Hasanabi Rages at Camila Cabello for Calling Out Cuba's 'Failing Dictatorship' – Internet...
Epstein Lookalike Daniel Biss and Champagne Socialist Kat Abughazaleh Share Intimate Post-...
Birds of a Feather: Kamala Harris Poses with Olympic 'Traitor' Eileen Gu –...
OpenAI Ignored Alarms on Trans Shooter's Violent ChatGPT Fantasies—Months Later, 8 Dead in...
ICE's Epic Troll (a Classic Rope-a-Dope): Detainees Gone Before Ilhan Omar Arrives to...
Cry Me a River: Eileen Gu Whines She's a 'Punching Bag' After Selling...
Alysa Liu's Olympic Gold Exposes Real Hypocrisy: Leftists Can't Handle GOP Supporting Lega...
Ann Bauer Schools an AWFL: From Anne Frank Memes to 'What Fraud ?'...
Dems Pearl Clutching About Trump 'Defying the Supreme Court' Are Being Hit With...
LOL! THAT Liberal Win Didn't Last Long: Trump's Back-Up Plan After SCOTUS Tariff...
AOC Is Concerned Republicans Are Turning Young Men Into REAL MEN

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement