Point-By-Point List of How Trump Is Causing the Complete COLLAPSE of the Democrat...
'It WASN'T Just Fulton County ...': DAMNING Thread Shows Some INTERESTING *cough cough*...
Mask SLIPPED?! Ilhan Omar CAUGHT in CHILLINGLY Honest Freudian Slip About Alex Pretti's...
WATCH: Long Beach Mayoral Candidate Rogelio Martinez Calls on the Gangs to ‘Take...
MASSIVE BREAKING: Justice Department Releases Another 3 Million Pages of Epstein Files
Deport Every Single Illegal Alien Possible
Anti-ICE Boomers Occupy Lobby of Trump Tower With Photos of Those Who've Died...
'Very Ironic': Draymond Green Fouled for Telling a Caucasian Referee Not to Put...
From COVID Survival to DoorDash Habit: A Gen Xer's Wake-Up Call on Convenience...
Judge Drops Death Penalty for Luigi Mangione, Sends a Harsh Message to Supreme...
Detroit Judge, Father, and Two Others Charged in Embezzlement Scheme
Hilarious Quality Learing Center Informercial Will Have You Starting Your Own Daycare
Texas Judge Orders the Release of That 'Arrested' Five-Year-Old and His Illegal Alien...
Boomer Time: Minnesota Target Targeted by Crooning Pro-Illegal Protesters
Aaron Rupar: Is There Any Precedent for Not Identifying the Federal Agent Who...

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos