NYC Leftist Protesters Call for Hanging of Kristi Noem and the Execution of...
Motherly Misdirection: Adam Schiff Pushes Fake Narrative That ICE Fatally Shot a Mom...
A Revolting Development: Insurrectionist Eric Swalwell Wants Blue States to Prosecute ICE...
Marco Rubio Quells Rumors About His Legendary Multitasking
Bulwark’s Tim Miller Draws Parallels Between Renee Good's ‘Assassination’ and Charlie Kirk...
WaPo’s Front-Page Video Analysis Claims ICE Agent Was Not in Vehicle’s Path
Mark Halperin Spots Sleight of Hand: Media's 'Full Analysis' of Renee Good Shooting...
Update: One of Those Shot in Portland Is a Venezuelan Tren de Aragua...
17 House Republicans Vote to Extend Obamacare Subsidies for Three Years
Daily Wire Talks to Genius in Minneapolis Who Quit Her Job to Protest...
Developing: Two Shot by CBP Agents in Portland, FBI Investigating
David French Twists Facts to Downplay Clear Self-Defense in Renee Good ICE Shooting
Debunking Keith Edwards' Lie: DeSantis Defended Drivers from Violent Mobs – NOT Resisting...
Media Malpractice: MS NOW Interviews a 'Trump Supporter' in Minneapolis ... Wearing a...
'She Looks Ridiculous': Congressman Sneers at Photo of 'Embarrassment' Kristi Noem

New York Times: Democrats won't talk about the inflation they fought for - flashback to 'stimmy checks'

The New York Times seems confused about why Democrats don’t want to talk about the $2 trillion they spent to ‘save the economy’ (aka, make inflation worse).

Advertisement

It must be because those rascally Republicans are going to pounce, right?

It’s actually because Democrats pushed for far more stimulus than was necessary, pushed it through Congress, and stimulated record inflation.

Guess what? If you give people a bunch of money they didn’t need and they spend that money on things they weren’t otherwise going to buy, prices go up.

Before we get into your thoughts on the NYT article, let’s take a moment to remember what Democrats were saying about those stimulus checks they’re not talking about now.

Remember, they were calling them ‘survival checks’.

Some of them were pushing for $2,000 checks EVERY MONTH. Imagine how quickly these people could wreck the country given half a chance.

Advertisement

Warren was smoking the ‘survival checks’ peyote too.

Yes, elections matter. 2020 cost us all dearly.

Democrats were very mouthy about ‘stimmy checks’. Now it’s crickets.

Guess who was right, AOC?

Even super moderate, just like us, common man, and not-at-all-a-big-liberal-phony, Tim Ryan, was pushing for MONTLY $2,000 checks. You might want to steer clear of this guy, Ohio.

Now back to the New York Times story.

Advertisement

Make sense, everyone?

We’re reasonably sure buying DOGE isn’t necessary for survival.

Buying votes always ends up costing much more in the long run. This applies to making other people pay for student loans as well.

Oops. From the NYT article: ‘Economists generally agree that the stimulus spending contributed to accelerating inflation, though they disagree on how much.’

Who could have seen that coming? People with a basic understanding of economics, that’s who.

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos