Day 3 of My Google Encampment: HELP! The Squirrels are Getting Woker
Burgess Owens Blisters Biden Education Secretary Over Title IX
Court Sketch Artist Must Be MAGA Because ROFL-WOW These Stormy Daniels Sketches Are...
'Joe Biden Endorses His Own Impeachment' in 2019 Tweet About Trump That's Aged...
Climate Defiance Toughies Laughed OFF X After Threatening to Make Life Miserable for...
Liz Cheney's Weepy Buyer's Remorse After Biden Turns His Back on Israel Backfires...
Check Out List of DEMANDS Illegals in Unauthorized Encampment Flying Palestinian Flag Sent...
Hillary Clinton Warns Trump Would Be Bad for Women, Try to Imprison Political...
Chris Cuomo TRIES Firing Back at Gina Carano Over COVID Post and LOL...
RFK Jr. Leans Hard Into Brain Worms Story With HILARIOUS Challenge for Trump,...
Truth HURTS! BRUTAL Thread DRAGS Biden for Not Only Turning His Back on...
Has Chris Cuomo Finally Seen the Light?
'This is Hysterical'! MSNBC Panel SHOCKED by Biden vs. Trump 'Threat to Democracy'...
DERP: John Harwood and Mehdi Hasan FACE-PLANT Pushing Blatant WaPo 'Misinformation' on Ill...
NUKED: Gina Carano ENDS Chris Cuomo With Straight-FAFO Post Including His Message Shaming...

L.A. Times explores Elon Musk's paradoxical 'less democracy, more freedom' vision for Twitter

Elon Musk’s bid to take over Twitter has brought with it a parade of media hot takes like no other. Here’s the latest:

Advertisement

So… more freedom means less “democracy”? Yeah, we’re confused too.

Well that’s certainly one way to look at it.

Behind Musk’s headline-grabbing gambit, however serious — and many question if it is serious — is a philosophical juxtaposition of two theories of how to manage and promote free speech as a social-media company in 2022. It’s a war between the public and the private, the controlled and the chaotic, the ESG investor crowd and the philosopher-troll king.

Over the years, like many publicly traded companies, Twitter’s more socialized investor structure has allowed oversight and activism by dissatisfied investors. As part of the broader movement in many industries to take environmental, social and governance factors into account, some shareholders have pushed for resolutions urging the company to, among other issues, take greater responsibility for the content on its services.

The problem these days is that the word “democracy” has been co-opted and re-defined as “Democrat narrative,” and therefore if something’s called “bad for democracy” it can simply be translated to mean “bad for Democrats.”

Advertisement

It’s helpful to Democrats, and therefore “democratic” according to the Left.

It’s worth noting that the L.A. Times is owned by a capital firm headed by a man with a reported net worth of over $7 billion. But billionaires such as Patrick Soon-Shiong or Jeff Bezos owning media doesn’t seem to be such a trigger to the left of center.

“Called it!” – G. Orwell

We probably should have put the “beverage warning” at the top of this story.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement