The Bulwark: Volunteers Delivering Babies at Home for Mothers Afraid of Going to...
Jeffrey Epstein Survivors to Attend SOTU as Guests of Democrats
Globe and Mail: 'Out of Nowhere,' Canada Became Poorer Than Alabama
Mayor Zohran Mamdani Requires Two Forms of ID to Become an Emergency Snow...
Talked Smack About America, Flipped the 'L' at Trump — Hunter Hess Finishes...
Attorney Attacks ICE Agents During Detention Operation, Finds Out
MLB Hall of Famer Bill Mazeroski Who Hit the Greatest Home Run In...
Sixth-Grade Special Needs Student Left Behind at Anti-ICE School Walkout
Minnesota Somali Women Demand Reparations for ICE 'Trauma'
Seeking a Better Life... at America's Expense: Expired Student Visa Scammer Bilks Seniors...
Texas Dems Looking Into 8-Month 'Coverup' of ICE Agent Killing a Citizen
MS NOW Host Says NOTHING As Chuck Schumer Claims Trump's Criticism of SCOTUS...
Remember Dems Denying Coordination Between the WH and DOJ on the Mar-a-Lago Raid?...
Another 'Outrageous ICE Abuse' Story from The Guardian—Headline Ignores Husband's Expired...
Poor Canada: Betting Their Entire Country's Worth on Beating the 'Hated' USA. Spoiler:...

OUCH! Watch Rand Paul explain why 'nuclear option' should be called something else

Senate Dems might be making a lot of noise (and looong speeches) in opposition to the nomination of Neil Gorsuch for the Supreme Court, but ultimately Republicans might use the “nuclear option” for confirmation. Sen. Rand Paul has an important reminder about why that could happen:

Advertisement

Out: “Nuclear option”; In: “Harry Reid’s precedent.” Way to go, ex-Senator Reid!

https://twitter.com/KenAuten1/status/849665899967770626

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement