Biden WH WON'T Like CNN's Explanation for 'Why Trump Is in a MUCH...
AGAIN!? Ron DeSantis 'Needs to Make Gavin Newsom a New Poop Map'
Is Bidenomics Bringing Back the Hamburglar? McDonald's May Offer a Five Dollar Meal...
'MERICA: Man Gives Local Government Creative Finger Over Boat Fence Mandate
Newsom-Appointed Regulators OK Change to Utility Billing That Makes Responsible Users PAY...
POPCORN TIME: DNC Prepares for Major Protests at Chicago Convention, Without Help of...
Antisemites in the UK's National Union of Students Have Expelled Union of Jewish...
Octogenarian Enviro-Nut 'Just Stop Oil' Members Attack LITERAL Foundations of Democracy in...
Biden Backstabs Israel, RFK Jr. & Kristi Noem Crash & Burn!
CBS ROASTED for Pushing Americans to 'Treat' Themselves to Cicada Recipes
Lefty 'Policy Director' Comparing Illegals to Slaves Proves Dems Have NEVER Changed Their...
Rep. Eric Swalwell Serves Up Another Great Reason NOT to Vote for Democrats
James Woods' 1-Word Reaction to Birx Admitting She Knew All Along COVID Vaccine...
Joe's Losing in REAL-TIME: Prominent Muslim/Arab Americans Officially Thumb Their Noses at...
GROSS! Biden's Department of Labor Tries to Pander to Mothers BUT Fails to...
Premium

New York Times' 1619 Project creator says 'It would be an honor' to call the George Floyd riots the 1619 riots

The New York Post had a piece Saturday suggesting that the riots that exploded after the police-involved death of George Floyd in Minneapolis be called the “1619 riots.” Charles Kesler writes:

The justified indignation over George Floyd’s killing has led to calls for policing reform and for the country to do better at fulfilling its principles. But the reaction hasn’t stopped with those worthy and noble objectives. It has surged well beyond to an ­attack on the principles themselves, which allegedly give rise to “systemic racism.”

So who else can they get at? Well, an easier target is one particular set of privileged, white males: the American Founders. The system at the root of systemic racism, the radicals argue, is the American one, beginning with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. America, they claim, was born a racist nation and remains one today.

The most prominent proponent of the argument is The New York Times’s 1619 Project, named after the year the first black slaves arrived in America. Nikole Hannah-Jones, the Times reporter who leads the project, has argued that “the year 1619 is as important to the American story as 1776.”

Her editor, Jake Silverstein, has backed her to the hilt. Black slavery “is sometimes referred to as the country’s original sin,” he asserted, “but it is more than that: It is the country’s very origin. Out of slavery — and the anti-black racism it required — grew nearly everything that has truly made America exceptional,” especially “its astonishing penchant for violence” and “its endemic racial fears and hatreds.”

In other words, 1619 is not “as important” as 1776; it is far more important and more revealing.

To which Nikole Hannah-Jones replied she’d be honored if she had some influence on the naming of the riots:

As Sally Kohn pointed out, Hannah-Jones notes that “it’s only property” — maybe just a black-owned small business here or there that was looted and burned down during the 1619 riots, or a pharmacy on which blacks depended to fill their prescriptions.

The 1619 Project: Coming to your school soon if it’s not part of the curriculum already.


Related:

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement