Stunning and Brave: Pro-Hamas Protesters Suddenly Beg to Go Home When Police Show...
Unlikely Hero: Bee Guy Has Diamondbacks Baseball Fans Absolutely Buzzing
VP Kamala Harris Posts About Trusting Women and It Goes HILARIOUSLY Wrong
'Glory to All Our Martyrs': Columbia Protesters Take Over Hamilton Hall
VIP: Where Are All The Feminists? J.K. Rowling And Others Are Yelling But...
Rep. Matt Gaetz Pushes Defense Secretary on 'Boots on the Ground' in Gaza
AOC Lashes Out at Mayor Eric Adams After He Promises to Intervene in...
DHS Data Reveals Hundreds of Thousands of Migrants Have Been Flown in on...
South Carolina Medicaid Office Caught Red-handed Distributing Voter Registration Forms to...
Illegal Immigrants Take Over Seattle City Park, Put Out Supply Requests
UNC Student's Beautiful Thread About Protecting Our Flag From Pro-Hamas 'Protesters' Will...
Freedom of the Press VASTLY More Important Than Suppressing 'False Information'
Bloviating Bore, Norman Finkelstein Links Gaza Protests to Himself
Four Teens, One a Football Star, Killed When Their SUV Is Stopped by...
Mayor Pete? Elon? Kent Police Department's TERRIBLE Police Sketch Sparks Hilarious Specula...

Sen. Mazie Hirono to originalist court nominee: 'You would not allow women and blacks to vote'

Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke is an originalist and said in a hearing Wednesday that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. This apparently set off alarm bells for Sen. Mazie Hirono, who seemed to assume that as an originalist, VanDyke would only look to the Constitution before it was amended.

Advertisement

That’s some gotcha. Alex Griswold reports in the Washington Free Beacon:

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii) attacked a judicial nominee Wednesday, charging that he would rule against suffrage for blacks and women if a hypothetical U.S. Constitution banned them from voting.

Hirono took issue with Trump judicial nominee Lawrence VanDyke’s statement that he would “look to the Constitution” when considering whether laws were constitutional. She said during a Judiciary Committee hearing such an approach would threaten the voting rights of minorities and women if the Constitution had not already been changed to ensure voting rights for minorities and women.

… “the point I’m making, of course, which you’re trying to get around, is that originalism means that you would interpret Constitution at the time of its enactment, and you would not allow women and blacks to vote because that was not in the Constitution when it was ratified in 1789,” Hirono said.

Advertisement

Advertisement


Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement