Labour Councillor WRECKED Over Idiotic Post About 'Gender Neutral Toilet' in His Home
Day 2 of My One-Woman Fight/Protest (Encampment!) Against Google: Diary, Even the SQUIRREL...
Wait ... WUT?! WATCH Gov. Kathy Hochul Say Young Black Kids in the...
John Fugelsang LOSES It After Nick Searcy Sends Him the Bee's Hilarious 'Woke...
J.K. Rowling Sums Up Trans Activists Threatening to Shoot 'TERFS' in Just Two...
Elizabeth Warren Goes Full 'HAMAS Nazi' With Post About 'Netanyahu's War'
She Really Went THERE?! Jen Psaki Let's the Mask SLIP on Morning Joe...
Maxine Waters Goes on Unhinged, Anti-Trump Rant on MSNBC
Democrat Woman's Face While Biden Accidentally Tells the Truth About His Crap Agenda...
Biden's Latest Gaffe on Taxes Is a Refreshingly Unintentional Moment of Honesty
Gen-Z Lefties Dropping Selfies With Their Ages BRAGGING About Voting for Biden BACKFIRES...
Just. WOW: DNC War Room Learns the Hard Way What FAFO Means After...
Three Simple Tweets Prove Without a DOUBT How Much the Biden Admin Actually...
'All PLANNED': Wokal Distance OWNS Protesters in EPIC Thread About Encampments (and Shutti...
Best and Brightest: Columbia Students Spell Palestine Wrong

Judge who struck down D.C. gun regulations 'wasn't authorized to hear case'

Zoe Tillman of the National Law Journal reports that a federal appeals court today ruled that a New York federal judge should never have been assigned to a Washington, D.C., gun case, vacating his order that struck down certain District gun regulations as unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

Advertisement

Earlier this year, U.S. District Judge Frederick Scullin Jr. handled the Palmer v. District of Columbia case, which challenged an earlier set of local gun laws that banned the public carrying of firearms. Scullin ruled the law unconstitutional. When Scullin was automatically assigned to a related case, challenging the requirement that individuals in the District show a “good reason” or “proper reason” for having the gun before they could get a license, the D.C. Office of the Attorney General argued that Scullin shouldn’t have heard the case and vacated his decision.

The case will go back to the district court for assignment to a new judge, Tillman reports.

Advertisement

WTOP reports that today’s ruling is just the latest in the District of Columbia’s long history of wrangling over gun rights:

A 2008 Supreme Court ruling struck down the city’s longstanding ban on handguns, and the city rewrote its gun law in response, allowing people to have handguns for self-defense in the home but not to carry them in public.

Residents and others sued over the new law. Scullin struck down the city’s ban on carrying handguns outside the home in 2014, and the city again rewrote its laws, allowing residents to carry guns but only if they have the required “good reason.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement