What Did She Know? Kamala Harris Must Be Held Accountable for Hiding Joe...
Check Your Privilege? Georgia Homeowner ARRESTED for Calling Police on Squatters on HER...
Yes, Next Question: Jacobin Mag Asks If CEOs Create More Value Than Workers,...
Yet ANOTHER HOAX: Racist Pro-Trump Messages Found on Tennessee College Campus Were Fabrica...
LET'S GO! Rand Paul Says He Supports Vast Majority of Trump Cabinet Nominees,...
UPDATE - ARREST MADE: Gov. Kathy Hochul Touts Safety of NYC Subway After...
Pure Projection! Musk Derangement Syndrome Sufferer AOC Says the RIGHT Controls Social Med...
Israel Foreign Ministry Takes Pope Francis to Task Over Pontiff's Claims of Israeli...
Drone Alone: Chris Christie Rolls to ABC ‘News’ Bringing Predictions of a Trump-Musk...
Risk It for the Brisket: Michigan BBQ Joint Continues Racking Up the Wins...
Oilfield Rando LAUGHING at Derpy Netflix Movie Because IT LOOKS BAD Triggers a...
Terrifying Transparency! Senator Tells CNN’s Dana Bash How Musk and X Users Upended...
Sen. Tim Scott Notes That 'Skyrocketing Costs' Are 'Bitter Aftertaste' of Biden’s Policies
Cenk Uygur ... Good Guy or Still a Bad Guy? I Have Questions
They've Learned NOTHING: Democrats' Man Problem Won't Be Fixed With Young 'Bro Whisperer'

New York Times issues correction to shrink scope of intelligence community consensus to actual size

It might not seem like much, but when news outlets like the Washington Post and the New York Times vocally beef up their fact-checking efforts and introduce new slogans like “Democracy Dies in Darkness,” it’s just as important for readers to go full whack-a-mole when fake news is given an airing (or even sue when old myths are revived).

Advertisement

On Thursday, the New York Times issued a correction to its piece on President Trump’s “deflections and denials about Russia,” pointing out that the intelligence community as a whole never came to a consensus on Russia’s activities in the 2016 election.

The report, issued by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and available in PDF format here, notes up front that “we” in the report refers collectively to the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA. So the correction is a bit like knocking the fabled “97 percent of scientists agree” number down quite a few notches.

The Daily Caller reports that the New York Times in an article published earlier in the week “incorrectly claimed all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies agreed that ‘Russia orchestrated the attacks, and did it to help get [Trump] elected,'” adding that Hillary Clinton made a similar claim in late May.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/BlackB4Illegal/status/880592631314739201

https://twitter.com/RightFolks/status/880572204483715073

https://twitter.com/AVonGauss/status/880595095430549504

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement