Kamala and Kentaji: Former Dem VP Harris Says Supreme Court Justice Jackson’s Dissents...
Katie Couric Tells Jennifer Welch That Progressive ‘News’ Outlets Are Trying to Adhere...
Rosie O'Donnell Goes on Three Day Trump Blackout - Can She Make It?
Congressional Candidate: Don't Worry About School Sickness Because Man With Brain Worm Is...
Minnesota Judges Form Rock Band Despite Increase in Threats to Blow Off Steam
NEA Says We Should Refer to America as 'What We Now Call the...
OOF! The Body Language of Fani Willis's Lawyer Says EVERYTHING About Her
Priest Twists Gospels to Critique Travel Ban and Immigration Policy
Boston Globe Covers the 'ICE Tea Party' in Rebellion Against Trump's Immigration Policy
AG Keith Ellison Announces Settlement With Kia and Hyundai Over Car Thefts
Dan Bongino Leaving the FBI in January
WHAT Insider Trading? Time Lapse Graph of Nancy Pelosi's AMAZING Stock Trading Acumen...
Miles ‘Anonymous’ Taylor Putting Up Billboards That Would Make the Seditious Six Proud
Sen. Ed Markey Says Trump’s Travel Ban Is ‘Racism Disguised as Security’
Nearly $150,000 Raised for Elderly Employee Harassed at Target for Wearing a Charlie...

Good luck with that: Public editor maintains ESPN will not stick to sports, whether viewers like it or not

After news broke Wednesday that ESPN would be cutting around 100 people, mostly on-air personalities, it wasn’t long before people pointed to the sports network’s continual detours into liberal politics as a probable cause.

Advertisement

Bleacher Report football columnist Michael Freeman slammed as “pathetic pieces of garbage” those who blamed politics for the layoffs, and Wednesday evening, ESPN Public Editor Jim Brady chimed in to clarify that the layoffs were a matter of economics, plain and simple; although he did acknowledge the network’s drift to one side of the political spectrum. Hmm … wonder which side?

It was just two weeks ago that Brady published a nearly 3,000-word essay concluding that “ESPN has made it clear: It’s not sticking to sports.”

Nope. Brady wasn’t quite as gruff as Freeman, but his message was similar: ESPN’s mix of sports and politics had nothing to do with the layoffs.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Supposing it’s true that the layoffs at ESPN were a function of “the less favorable economics of an unbundled cable world” — what would it hurt to listen to the public and lay off the politics? “Like it or not” isn’t what most would consider responsive customer service.

https://twitter.com/nabby60/status/857398521607200769

https://twitter.com/fysbox/status/857400495165538306

https://twitter.com/bobby15248309/status/857399472292335620

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/WaynesterAtl/status/857275807009562625

https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/857349708133675008

* * *

Related:

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement