Double Drivel: Hakeem Jeffries Ignorantly Claims New York Knicks Fan Trump Knows Nothing...
Craze and Means: Trump’s Not the Only Republican Kristen Welker of NBC News...
WNBA’s Brianna Turner Opposes USA 250 Patches on Uniforms Because Players Wouldn’t Have...
Jonathan Chait: The GOP's Refusal to Accept Spencer Pratt's Defeat Is Bizarre and...
Los Angeles Dodger Blake Treinen Was Not Wearing a Pride Hat on Pride...
WSJ Calls Them 'Dark Years.' Reality Calls Them Graham Platner’s Entire Pathetic Adult...
End Wokeness: ‘Nothing Can Prepare You for the Voice of this US House...
Bernie’s Last Gift to America: A Cheating Socialist With a Nazi Skull Tattoo
Woman Sues to Stop UFC Freedom 250 Event, Claiming ‘Aesthetic Injury’ to Her...
See Jane Divorce Dick: Scott Pelley Compares Getting Fired to Wife Jane’s Murder
Karmelo Anthony’s Defense Asks If It Was Possible Austin Metcalf Impaled Himself on...
Democrats Admit: Forget Border, Prices, or Crime — We’re Impeaching President Trump on...
Ex-Gawker Writer's Pathetic Knicks Fanfic: 'Boo Trump, Cheer My Commie Hero' Gets Absolute...
Democrats Suddenly Love White Men Again… Too Bad They Only Have the Self-Hating...
Scott Pelley Nearly Tears Up Recalling Being in Combat for This Country

Wellesley's Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity offers tips to avoid pain, injury caused by guest speakers

Faculty members at Columbia University felt compelled to dismiss the work of upcoming campus speaker Charles Murray as “tendentious dogma,” but at least they did so while reminding students and others that his presence on campus was no excuse for violence.

Advertisement

It’s unfortunate that any statement to that effect was necessary at all, but it could have been worse: Reason.com reports that the Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE) at Wellesley recently sent an email discouraging “guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” without first considering the possible pain, injury, harm, and damage to the student body.

Yes, those are all words used in the email … about guest speakers.

Controversial speakers are also considered an imposition on the liberty of the disempowered, “who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”

Can’t they just ignore speech with which they disagree, if it’s that painful to process? Apparently not: “Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

Advertisement

Then what’s this talk about the need for faculty and administrators to step in on their behalf, as “the responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students”? Actually, never mind. It’s not like we’d ever be allowed on campus anyway asking painful questions like these.

https://twitter.com/inflatedKarma/status/844635664360583170

https://twitter.com/adviceforbernie/status/844633673966243844

https://twitter.com/Osscitio/status/844773466968535041

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632352173252608

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632986167492609

Any students concerned that they, in their zeal to encourage discussion, might actually “stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” are welcomed to approach CERE for expert guidance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement