Nice Timing: Marc Elias Says: Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Demanding New Jersey Release Voter...
Election Results LIVE on Twitchy! Arizona on Tap Tonight
'Politeness is White Supremacy?' Rep. Gill Grills Smithsonian Director on Their Own Woke...
Even a Senior Mamdani Administration Official Says There's No Way He's Arresting Benjamin...
CRAZY Jasmine Crockett Implodes: Calls GOP Hearing a 'Republican White Pride Rally'
Former Sanders Outreach Chief: Bernie Has Endorsed the Most Antisemitic Candidates in a...
Jasmine Crockett Exposes the Racism Behind the World Cup Final
CNN’s Own Legal Expert Buries BIG Dummy Zohran Mamdani’s Netanyahu Arrest Threat: 'A...
Jim Accosted?: Ex-CNN ‘Journo’ Recounts Terrifying Trump Rallies Where Grandmas Shouted at...
NOT YOU! Pete Buttigieg Asks, 'Then What?' After Trump ... and He's Not...
Software Error Adds 6,600 Noncitizens to NJ Voter Rolls, Gov Says, As Trump...
Mia Farrow's Manner of Defending Trans People Deemed WRONG and Now She's in...
WaPo Predictably Melts Down Over Trump Placing Founding Father Statue in White House...
Not Just Bibi: Parkland Grifter Cameron Kasky Calls Entirety of Israel 'Irreconcilably Gen...
Chris Cillizza BRAGS About Registering in VA WITHOUT Choosing a Party, There's Just...

Wellesley's Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity offers tips to avoid pain, injury caused by guest speakers

Faculty members at Columbia University felt compelled to dismiss the work of upcoming campus speaker Charles Murray as “tendentious dogma,” but at least they did so while reminding students and others that his presence on campus was no excuse for violence.

Advertisement

It’s unfortunate that any statement to that effect was necessary at all, but it could have been worse: Reason.com reports that the Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE) at Wellesley recently sent an email discouraging “guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” without first considering the possible pain, injury, harm, and damage to the student body.

Yes, those are all words used in the email … about guest speakers.

Controversial speakers are also considered an imposition on the liberty of the disempowered, “who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”

Can’t they just ignore speech with which they disagree, if it’s that painful to process? Apparently not: “Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

Advertisement

Then what’s this talk about the need for faculty and administrators to step in on their behalf, as “the responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students”? Actually, never mind. It’s not like we’d ever be allowed on campus anyway asking painful questions like these.

https://twitter.com/inflatedKarma/status/844635664360583170

https://twitter.com/adviceforbernie/status/844633673966243844

https://twitter.com/Osscitio/status/844773466968535041

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632352173252608

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632986167492609

Any students concerned that they, in their zeal to encourage discussion, might actually “stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” are welcomed to approach CERE for expert guidance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement