SHADY AF! Megyn Kelly Takes Oprah's Explanation About the Million Kamala Paid Her...
The MSM/White House Press Secretary Revolving Door Wasn't a Journalistic Ethics Problem Un...
Clean Up, Aisle CNN! WATCH Hack COMPLETELY Lose His Cool Debating Scott Jennings...
Adam Schiff ... REALLY?! Deep State Democrats Openly Organizing Their Own Shadow Governmen...
Wait, We've HEARD This One Before! CBS News Swings at Pete Hegseth and...
Drew Holden Drops MOTHER of All Truth Bomb RECEIPTS on Ana Navarro for...
Lisa Boothe Drops Truth About What Actress Eva Longoria REALLY Fled (Spoiler: NOT...
Another Stunning Woman Declares a Sex Strike Due to Trump's Win ... and...
Drunk Nancy Then and Now: Side-By-Side Video Show's Pelosi's Gaslighting the Democrat 'Pri...
OH, SHUT UP: Joe Walsh Goes to BBC to Encourage America's Allies to...
Scientific American Editor in Chief, Laura Helmuth Resigns - Science Saved
Here Are a Couple of Really Unfortunate Anti-Trump Tattoos
CNN Digs Up Bill Kristol’s Endorsement Video for Pete Hegseth
NBC News: FDA Employees Threaten to Quit If Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Is...
Jonathan Turley Calls Matt Gaetz Nomination the ‘100,000-Volt Option’

Wellesley's Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity offers tips to avoid pain, injury caused by guest speakers

Faculty members at Columbia University felt compelled to dismiss the work of upcoming campus speaker Charles Murray as “tendentious dogma,” but at least they did so while reminding students and others that his presence on campus was no excuse for violence.

Advertisement

It’s unfortunate that any statement to that effect was necessary at all, but it could have been worse: Reason.com reports that the Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE) at Wellesley recently sent an email discouraging “guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” without first considering the possible pain, injury, harm, and damage to the student body.

Yes, those are all words used in the email … about guest speakers.

Controversial speakers are also considered an imposition on the liberty of the disempowered, “who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”

Can’t they just ignore speech with which they disagree, if it’s that painful to process? Apparently not: “Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

Advertisement

Then what’s this talk about the need for faculty and administrators to step in on their behalf, as “the responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students”? Actually, never mind. It’s not like we’d ever be allowed on campus anyway asking painful questions like these.

https://twitter.com/inflatedKarma/status/844635664360583170

https://twitter.com/adviceforbernie/status/844633673966243844

https://twitter.com/Osscitio/status/844773466968535041

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632352173252608

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632986167492609

Any students concerned that they, in their zeal to encourage discussion, might actually “stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” are welcomed to approach CERE for expert guidance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement