It Wouldn't Be Christmas Without Perpetual Grinch Neil deGrasse Tyson Trying to Steal...
Premier of New South Wales Says They Don't Have Free Speech Like America...
Biden vs. Trump: Compare the Scene at the Southern Border Last Christmas to...
Scott Jennings Is Simply NOT Having a Wonderful Christmastime Because of This Beatle’s...
Merry Christmas to Everyone! Yes, Even the Worst of the Worst on the...
Parents Beware: Beloved Ms. Rachel Now on Team with NYC's Far-Left Mayor –...
Get Christ Out of Christmas? Atheists Gets Their Tinsel in a Twist When...
Christmas Morning Merry Meme Madness
NBC News: Judges Who Ruled Against Trump Say Harassment and Threats Have Upended...
Tim Walz Says ICE Raids Are What Happens ‘When They No Longer Hide...
Ho Ho No: Libertarian Compares Santa to Illegals, Gets Ratio'd Into the North...
Former EU Commissioner Butthurt About Being Banned From the US for Censorship
Derek Hunter Violated X's Rules Against Hateful Content With Post About Jennifer Welch
Peak Christmas Nerdery: Full Probability Analysis of Why the Home Alone Family Slept...
Margaret Sullivan Says Journalism's Goal Is to 'Afflict the Comfortable and Comfort the...

Wellesley's Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity offers tips to avoid pain, injury caused by guest speakers

Faculty members at Columbia University felt compelled to dismiss the work of upcoming campus speaker Charles Murray as “tendentious dogma,” but at least they did so while reminding students and others that his presence on campus was no excuse for violence.

Advertisement

It’s unfortunate that any statement to that effect was necessary at all, but it could have been worse: Reason.com reports that the Commission for Ethnicity, Race, and Equity (CERE) at Wellesley recently sent an email discouraging “guest speakers with controversial and objectionable beliefs” without first considering the possible pain, injury, harm, and damage to the student body.

Yes, those are all words used in the email … about guest speakers.

Controversial speakers are also considered an imposition on the liberty of the disempowered, “who often feel the injury most acutely and invest time and energy in rebutting the speakers’ arguments.”

Can’t they just ignore speech with which they disagree, if it’s that painful to process? Apparently not: “Students object in order to affirm their humanity. This work is not optional; students feel they would be unable to carry out their responsibilities as students without standing up for themselves.”

Advertisement

Then what’s this talk about the need for faculty and administrators to step in on their behalf, as “the responsibility to defend the disempowered does not rest solely with students”? Actually, never mind. It’s not like we’d ever be allowed on campus anyway asking painful questions like these.

https://twitter.com/inflatedKarma/status/844635664360583170

https://twitter.com/adviceforbernie/status/844633673966243844

https://twitter.com/Osscitio/status/844773466968535041

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632352173252608

https://twitter.com/WoganMay/status/844632986167492609

Any students concerned that they, in their zeal to encourage discussion, might actually “stifle productive debate by enabling the bullying of disempowered groups,” are welcomed to approach CERE for expert guidance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement