QUIET Piggy! Julianna Olivia Claims GOP Uses AI to Hide Trump's Decline, Trips...
Shocker! Looks Like Tim Walz and 'White Dudes for Harris' Actually Made the...
Epstein Survivors HAMMER House Democrats Who Appear to be More Concerned With Getting...
'She's the WORST': Jessica Tarlov Tries Crediting Biden for Lowest Inflation Seen in...
Brown University President In SERIOUS CYA-Mode, Refuses to Admit Lack of Cameras Was...
The Guardian Tells WaPo to Hold Their Beer With This Headline About Bondi...
TRY As They Might, The New York Times Admits They Can Find NO...
Mayor of Richmond, California Makes Antisemitic Post, Surprising No One
Meet the Former (Homeless) Brown University Grad Whose Reddit Post All But Cracked...
There's a Law That's Quietly Killing America's Veterans. It Needs to Stop.
Joe Concha Spots MS NOW's 10-Year Ratings Brag Turning Into Another Dem Graph...
Former Brown University Student Pulls BACK the Curtain on the Ivy League in...
CNN’s Jake Tapper Enlists Doctor Who Was Wrong About Biden to Diagnose Trump’s...
Delusional Democrat Claims Deporting Illegal Aliens Makes ALL Americans Less Safe
Dem Chuck Schumer Warns That the Legacy Media Is Consolidating Behind Trump

Could the New York Times have found a softer couch for its recollection of the blind sheik?

Nearly a week after the death of the “blind sheik” Omar Abdel Rahman in a U.S. prison, the New York Times published an interview with his lawyer, Lynne Stewart, in which she remembered Rahman not as a terrorist but as the “personification of an American hero.”

Advertisement

Credit is due the New York Times for interrupting its loving ode to Stewart, who served prison time for smuggling messages from Rahman to his followers in Egypt, with a quick reality check from the National Review’s Andrew C. McCarthy, who was lead prosecutor in the case against Rahman.

“The blind sheikh was neither an American nor a hero — he was the antithesis of both,” McCarthy added. “He would have been offended at the former suggestion, and all civilized people at the latter.”

Even though the blind sheik was convicted in 1995 of plotting “what prosecutors said” was a campaign of terror that included the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and hoped to take out tunnels and other landmarks, Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld took special notice of little qualifiers like that one sprinkled throughout the New York Times piece.

Advertisement

It certainly was good of the Times to allow the lead prosecutor to have a word, then, seeing as every mention of the blind sheik’s crimes is prefaced by the disclaimer, “prosecutors said.”

For a more definitive look back at the trial of the blind sheikh, McCarthy offered his own take in National Review that pulls no punches.

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos