MS NOW Hosts Wonder If the Michigan Synagogue Attack Is the Fault of......
Old Dominion Shooting Suspect Previously Convicted of Providing Support to ISIS
Veep IRL: Ohio Democrat Sues Trump for Exclusion — Invitation Was in Her...
Tuberville Sounds Alarm on Mamdani's Ramadan Iftar as Threat—Mamdani Plays It off as...
Anti-ICE Dems Block DHS Funding Again As Synagogue in Michigan Is Attacked
Steven Crowder Taking ABC and Their Iran 'Slopaganda' APART Point-by-DAMNING-Point Is a BE...
Guy Benson Sarcastically Applauds Dems Who FINALLY Found Some Gov't Spending They’re Willi...
Senate Dems Pretend to Suddenly CARE About Gas Prices to Dunk on Trump...
Thune Advances the Save America Act After Trump Demands Results
The DESPERATE Way Eric Swalwell Is Trying to SPIN 'Fake Residency' Story, WOW,...
'Should Be Immediately Retracted'! Karoline Leavitt Shreds ABC News' 'BREAKING' Iran Threa...
CNN Takes a Break From Parroting Regime Propaganda and Just Plugs Into Iranian...
The First Great Awakening: A Revival That Prepared America for Independence
Dems Accusing GOP of Blocking Their Attempts to Fund FEMA, TSA and More...
Jessica Tarlov Does Her DAMNEDEST to Make U.S.'s Actions in Iran a FAILURE...

Could the New York Times have found a softer couch for its recollection of the blind sheik?

Nearly a week after the death of the “blind sheik” Omar Abdel Rahman in a U.S. prison, the New York Times published an interview with his lawyer, Lynne Stewart, in which she remembered Rahman not as a terrorist but as the “personification of an American hero.”

Advertisement

Credit is due the New York Times for interrupting its loving ode to Stewart, who served prison time for smuggling messages from Rahman to his followers in Egypt, with a quick reality check from the National Review’s Andrew C. McCarthy, who was lead prosecutor in the case against Rahman.

“The blind sheikh was neither an American nor a hero — he was the antithesis of both,” McCarthy added. “He would have been offended at the former suggestion, and all civilized people at the latter.”

Even though the blind sheik was convicted in 1995 of plotting “what prosecutors said” was a campaign of terror that included the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and hoped to take out tunnels and other landmarks, Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld took special notice of little qualifiers like that one sprinkled throughout the New York Times piece.

Advertisement

It certainly was good of the Times to allow the lead prosecutor to have a word, then, seeing as every mention of the blind sheik’s crimes is prefaced by the disclaimer, “prosecutors said.”

For a more definitive look back at the trial of the blind sheikh, McCarthy offered his own take in National Review that pulls no punches.

 

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos