Dem. Senate Candidate Would Trade Five Americans for One Illegal Alien Farmworker
University of California Students May Struggle With Basic Math but Are Graduating at...
'Legal Observer' Witnessed a Forklift Run Into the Kennedy Center Pillars 'Several Times'
Maria Salazar Warns Trump His Immigration Enforcement Efforts Have Gone Too Far in...
Bernie Sanders Butthurt That Billionaire Stadium Owners Can ‘Silence’ Artists Who Speak Ou...
SCIENCE! The New Yorker Believes That You CAN, Actually, Get a 'Little Bit...
CNN’s Dana Bash Says ‘It’s Just Gross’ That Michigan Voters Wouldn’t Vote for...
Insane: X Puts Abi Spanberger on Blast After Report of yet ANOTHER Illegal...
Gavin Newsom Rake Stomps Again While Pointing Out How Much Gas Prices Have...
This Is BIG! Abdul El-Sayed Just Lost a BIG Endorsement (Especially in Michigan!)...
Hasan Piker Goes Rogue, Screws Democrats With America 'Worse' Than Al-Qaeda Comment
The New York Times Just Reminded Us All How Much They Suck With...
Sue McConnell Continues to SPIRAL, Starts Actively Challenging X to PROVE She Doxxed...
Haley Stevens Holds Her Own Against UNHINGED El-Sayed Fan Threatening Her With the...
'Fear,' 'Terrifying': How Americans Really Feel About the Rise of Socialism

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement