Borderline Stupid: Chris Cuomo Doubts Dems Will Flood US With Illegal Aliens If...
PA Gov. Josh Shapiro Says He's Suing to Stop 'Unconstitutional' Attempt to Restrict...
Toronto Sun Columnist: New Memo Tells CBC Journalists Not to Refer to 9/11...
BOMBSHELL Study: Trans Ideology Fans More Likely to Back Violence — Including Killing...
Kentucky Fried Nightmare? China KFCs Add Chicken Sandwich With Oreo Cookie-Style Bun to...
Jon Favreau Tries to Contain Backfire for El-Sayed With a 'Stop Talking About...
Judge Lifts Her Nationwide Block on Trump's Mail-In Ballot Executive Order After SCOTUS...
We Have Lost Too Many Legends — but a First-Of-Its-Kind Pill Just Gave...
El-Sayed's Latest Attempt to Distance Himself From 'a Streamer in California' Is Failing...
American Heroes of 9/11: Rick Rescorla
Appeals Court Tosses Rep. LaMonica McIver's Claim of Legislative Immunity
Here Are Details About the Arrested 'Father' This NM Dem Didn't Mention While...
Taylor Lorenz: Queen of Cancel Culture & Leopards Eating Faces Party Founder Discovers...
Lunatic District Attorney Vows to 'Blow Up' White House Ballroom
Dana Loesch’s Bold Fix: Stuff Near-80 Icons in Giant Koozies Before We Lose...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement