I Believe I can Fly: Video Captures Yellowstone Tourist Hurled Into the Air...
Chad Pergram Places Graham's Passing Into Historical Perspective
'These People Are So F-ing Stupid!' James Carville Posts WILD Rant Against Frankenstein's...
Report: House GOP Eyes Budget in Wake of Lindsey Graham's Passing
Mitt Romney Remembers Sen. Lindsey Graham With Ukraine on the Brain
DataRepublican Continues DECONSTRUCTING Candace Owens, This Time Taking Her Kirk Con/Grift...
Spencer Pratt Knows What DSA REALLY Stands for and BAHAHA
HO ... Sorry ... Ro Khanna Dramatically Thanking Peeps 'Concerned for His Safety'...
Never FAILS: Rest in Hell Trends After Graham Passes; Lefties Remind Us of...
'Judge Me by My ENEMIES' --> THIS Five-Day-Old Post From Lindsey Graham DEFINITELY...
'MASSIVE POS' Ana Kasparian Gets Her Clock CLEANED for Shockingly VILE Post After...
'What's Happening on the Ground' Post Sheds Some Light on Lindsey Graham's Possible...
Breaking: U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham Dead at Age 71, Republican Lawmaker Passed After...
Climate Change Reportedly Driving Child Marriage as Families Struggle to Survive
Indiana Lt. Governor Calls for Ban on Mosques Broadcasting Call to Prayer Over...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement