Dem Senator (and Iranian Regime Propagandist) Chris Murphy Pivots From 'War Crimes' to...
Culture Clubbed: MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell Says Trump’s Second Election Already Crushed...
'I'm With Iran': John Pavlovitz and the Left's Long Tradition of Siding With...
Did Iran Cave or Was This TACO Tuesday? CNN's Erin Burnett Apparently Disappointed
From Tampon Tim to Hypocrite-in-Chief: Walz's Trump Attack Backfires Spectacularly
Zohran Mamdani’s Office Says New York’s History Is One of Colonization and Racial...
Society Thrives on Marriage and Birth Celebrations— Not Birthday Extravaganzas for the Sin...
Rep. María Salazar Hopes Her Dignity Act Eventually Leads to a Path to...
As Crime Explodes, Minneapolis Leaders Go Full Sodom: Legal Bathhouses Incoming
Politico Wants You to Meet Harmeet Dhillon, the Woman Who Thinks Civil Rights...
AP: Iran's Supreme National Security Council Has Accepted a Two-Week Ceasefire
Video Shows Illegal Wanted for Murder Attempting to Run Down ICE Agents, Getting...
Rubio Tuesday
James Woods Calls Out Jennifer Newsom for Telling Prisoners Their Crimes Were Probably...
Scum of the Earth Stick Together: Cheating Ruben Gallego Defends Eric Swalwell Amid...

Families of Orlando nightclub terror attack victims sue social media outlets for providing support to ISIS

The families of three men shot by Omar Mateen during his terror attack on the Orlando nightclub Pulse in June have filed a lawsuit against Twitter, Facebook, and Google for helping radicalize Mateen and for providing material support.

Advertisement

The suit alleges the three companies provided the terrorist group ISIS with the means “to spread extremist propaganda, raise funds, and attract new recruits.”

https://twitter.com/ghostofanation/status/810976572261814272

Fox News reports:

At the heart of the lawsuit is the interpretation of a provision tucked deep inside the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 called Section 230.

The language of Section 230 states that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In layman’s terms, this basically means that sites like Facebook or YouTube are not liable for what their users post on their sites.

As tempting as it is to sympathize with the friends and families of those killed in the mass shooting, a lawsuit against social media providers because of a terrorist’s actions is an awfully slippery slope.

Advertisement

Social media companies have enough trouble policing themselves; YouTube, for example, already thinks Dennis Prager’s PragerU videos and Christina H. Sommers’ Factual Feminist videos are “inappropriate.” Imagine them being handed the standing excuse that they could be sued for, say, giving conservatives a platform to spread their “hate speech” or promote firearms ownership.

https://twitter.com/brentsmrs/status/810977196395393024

https://twitter.com/FigmentsB/status/810980280508895232

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement