Spare Us, Snow White: Rachel Zegler Records Horrible Video Full of Narcissism and...
PLEASE Let Them Be This Dumb: Reports Circulate About a HILARIOUS Potential DNC...
Totally Hammered: Animated Lord of the Rings Movie Throws Down the Gauntlet in...
Congratulations: State Rep. Zooey Zephyr Used the Bathroom Today
Brit Split: Ellen Degeneres and Wife Start New Life in Merry Old England...
President Biden Awards Medal of Freedom to Former Planned Parenthood President
Laverne Cox Likens Women-Only Bathroom Policy to Nazism
Two Photos Capture ‘Stark Contrast’ in Foreign Relations Between Biden and Trump
DOGE Co-Efficiency: Musk and Vivek Publish Plan to Cut Costs and Eradicate Government...
Name Dropping: Comcast Spin-Off to Force MSNBC to Strike 'NBC' From Its Moniker
Brava Maestra! Justine Bateman Offers a GLOWING Video Review for Once and It's...
True Team Leaders Must Consider the Impact on Teammates of Doing the Trump...
He's Back! Rob Reiner Reemerges for the First Time Since Trump's Victory
Do Most Kids REALLY Need College? Dr. Strangetweet Offers Compelling Reasons Why They...
Joe Biden's Intern Forgot to Post About Trans Day of Remembrance

IT'S REAL: After insisting the election couldn't be rigged, liberals pretty sure election could have been rigged

Justine Bateman’s Twitter bio indicates she has a bachelor’s degree in computer science from UCLA, so she’d know not to question a computer scientist, right?

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/JustineBateman/status/801217528856879106

What’s real? Proof that hackers tampered with the election results to ensure Donald Trump’s victory, that’s what. Check out this piece in New York magazine in which a group of prominent computer scientists urge the Clinton campaign to challenge the vote count in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

OK, whoa. That’s crazy. But what exactly happened to all of the news stories published in the weeks before the election debunking Donald Trump’s claim that the election was rigged? It was impossible, right? And yet, after Trump surprised everyone by winning the election, those claims of infallibility don’t seem so certain anymore.

Paul Krugman certainly had his interest piqued.

Advertisement

Um, what? It might not be true, but because there’s doubt, “we” need to address it? Has Harry Reid’s friend been seen around the New York Times offices?

So, whatever is put “out there” needs to be investigated to satisfy the suspicious? Here’s a news flash: the suspicious will always be suspicious, and those who don’t believe Trump won fair and square will never believe it — and even if they did, they’ve pledged not to accept it.

https://twitter.com/MangyLover/status/801242221571952641

Advertisement

Before the “I’m With Her” die-hards short out their keyboards forwarding that article to everyone they know, they might consider looking at these tweets from Nate Cohn and Nate Silver.

Advertisement

There’s a very good chance of that, although Krugman seems to have settled down a bit.

What is this “needs” word that Krugman keeps talking about? What the whole #AuditTheVote camp “needs” is to get a grip and accept that their candidate lost. It happens.

Advertisement

Why won’t he stop!

First, stop saying “we.” Just stop it. And second, realize that this is nothing new whatsoever: float fake news, watch as the public freaks out over fake news, and finally, correct the record if necessary long after everyone has stopped caring. The only thing that has changed is the trajectory of the misdirection, due to the surprise result of the election.

Ah, at last, the real issues.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/OrwellForks/status/801258971642417152

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement