ABC News: Glaciers Could Disappear in Coming Decades, According to 'New Research'
It Wouldn't Be Christmas Without Perpetual Grinch Neil deGrasse Tyson Trying to Steal...
Premier of New South Wales Says They Don't Have Free Speech Like America...
Biden vs. Trump: Compare the Scene at the Southern Border Last Christmas to...
Scott Jennings Is Simply NOT Having a Wonderful Christmastime Because of This Beatle’s...
Merry Christmas to Everyone! Yes, Even the Worst of the Worst on the...
Parents Beware: Beloved Ms. Rachel Now on Team with NYC's Far-Left Mayor –...
Get Christ Out of Christmas? Atheists Gets Their Tinsel in a Twist When...
Christmas Morning Merry Meme Madness
NBC News: Judges Who Ruled Against Trump Say Harassment and Threats Have Upended...
Tim Walz Says ICE Raids Are What Happens ‘When They No Longer Hide...
Ho Ho No: Libertarian Compares Santa to Illegals, Gets Ratio'd Into the North...
Former EU Commissioner Butthurt About Being Banned From the US for Censorship
Derek Hunter Violated X's Rules Against Hateful Content With Post About Jennifer Welch
Peak Christmas Nerdery: Full Probability Analysis of Why the Home Alone Family Slept...

CNN political reporter seems a bit too anxious to accuse Michael Flynn of bias against Muslims

We’re not saying the mainstream media is anxiously poised to pounce on anything and everything that President-elect Donald Trump does, but … actually, that’s exactly what we’re saying.

Advertisement

CNN on Tuesday afternoon posted a piece on retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, Trump’s pick to be national security adviser, noting in its headline that Flynn in August called Islamism a “vicious cancer” that has to be “excised.”

That quote apparently struck CNN political reporter Sara Murray as worthy of repeating:

Sara Murray deleted tweet

Something went wrong in this game of telephone, though: Islam is world’s second largest religion; Islamism is not.

Credit Murray for acknowledging that she misinterpreted the headline. Flynn certainly isn’t beyond criticism, and his record deserves to be examined — but the media at large really needs to dial back the impulse to attack that characterized its pre-election campaign coverage.

Advertisement

We have to admit we’d be a little more anxious to read CNN’s coverage of “—isms” if we were certain its reporters knew what they were.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos