UnitedHealthcare Social Media Manager Upset That WHCD Assassin Missed
Ro Khanna Weeps for 'Students in Fear' of ICE — Ignores US Kids...
NYT: Sergey Brin’s Girlfriend Has Shown Off Photos of Him in a MAGA...
Rep. Gill Forces Abortion Advocate to Confront Grisly Reality of Her Position —...
Socialism's Math Lesson: NYC Mayor Mamdani Promises Free Everything, Then Begs New York...
Joyce Carol Oates: Do You Know Who Else Had a Bunker? Hitler
Dr. Wishing Trump Dead Holds Life in Her Hands: Beth Israel Faces Backlash...
Adam Kinzinger: Zelensky Hasn’t Whined About Needing a Ballroom to Keep Him Safe
Texas Tribune: Egyptian Family Long Held in ICE Detention Redetained After Judge-Ordered R...
White House Trolls the Left Perfectly — ‘No Kings’ Crowd Has Entered the...
Hetero Hatred: Aaron Rupar Seems VERY Upset that Donald Trump Finds His Wife...
Oof! JoJoFromJerz's Face Filter Melts as Jack Posobiec Reveals Attempted Trump Shooter Was...
The Internet Is A-BUZZ Over President Trump Holding a Bee
Seashell Formation Enthusiast James Comey Indicted for a Second Time
Richard Stengel: Holding the WHCD at White House Ballroom Could Violate First Amendment

Brit Hume dismisses as 'utter claptrap' professors' defense of safe spaces as 'incubators of new ideas'

As Twitchy reported last month, the University of Chicago’s dean of students scored big with a refreshing letter to incoming students, letting them know not to expect either safe spaces into which they could retreat or trigger warnings accompanying guest speakers.

Advertisement

Of course there was a backlash, with Jeet Heer aruging in The New Republic that the letter was an attack on academic freedom that would have a chilling effect on educators charged with shepherding today’s special snowflakes from high school to adulthood.

On Wednesday, The College Fix reported that more than 140 professors co-signed a letter in the campus newspaper defending safe spaces, and Fox News’ Brit Hume summed it up pretty well.

The educators defended safe spaces in their letter by tracing their history in “gay, civil rights, and feminist efforts of the mid-20th century” and called them “incubators of new ideas away from the censure of the very authorities threatened by these movements.”

Further, they noted that requests for safe spaces “often touch on substantive, ongoing issues of bias, intolerance, and trauma that affect our intellectual exchanges,” concluding, “We deplore any atmosphere of harassment and threat.”

That is a bunch of claptrap. So if, say, an assistant professor goes in search of muscle to prevent a reporter from covering a protest in a “media-free safe space,” who exactly is doing the threatening?

Advertisement

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement