NYTimes Comms Infuriated by Attempt to 'Stoke Outrage' With Screenshots of Today's 9/11...
Ro Khanna Claims He's TEAM AMERICA — Blames Bibi for Gas and Groceries
American Heroes of 9/11: Stephen Siller
Gad Saad Shares DAMNING Shot of Eighth Grade 9/11 Lesson Plan a Mom...
AOC and Zohran Mamdani Spotted Yucking It UP As Names of Those Murdered...
Faith Over Fear: A Tribute to Charlie Kirk
He's Literally a Norm MacDonald MEME: Zohran Mamdani Quick to Claim HE Was...
People Have Questions About Gayle King's Reaction When Finding Out the Holdout Clancy...
Scott Jennings Has a New 'Title' for Hillary Clinton After She Claims October...
Kimmel Said Trump Appeared on His Show While Running for Office and That...
A RECKONING —> 9-11 Widow Goes Rogue Calling Out Islamic Terror for What...
Fairfax County Schools’ 9/11 Do’s and Don’ts for Teachers: Hide the Jihad and...
Lindsay Clancy Juror on CBS Mornings Describes the Lone Holdout and 'Gayle Sounds...
Elon Musk, Grok, and ALL of X Fact-Check TF Out of AOC Making...
Pink Slip Peggy: Michele Tafoya Calls Out Peggy Flanagan As Minnesota Race Tightens

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos