Israel War Room Torches NBC News' Post About Plane That Apparently Decided to...
JD Vance Personally Thanks Trump As a Marine for Ending the War in...
VIDEO: Former DOJ Lawyer John Yoo Says Christa Pike Could Face a Firing...
Trump Stole the Stage at the California Gubernatorial Debate
OOF: Pretty Sure We Know Why Abdul El-Sayed TRIED Deleting THIS X Post....
Jessica Tarlov Thought Using a Trump Post to Sell Her Book Was a...
'Did the Terrorist Write This Headline?' CBS Dusts Off a Media Cliché for...
Xavier Becerra Set Himself Up Like a Bowling Pin for Steve Hilton's Debate...
'What a SICK Woman': Ana Kasparian Implies FlyDubai Attack Was a False Flag...
Adam Schiff's Election Disinformation Warning Collapses Under the Weight of All the Shamel...
From the TOP ROPE! Scott Jennings Leaves CNN Panel STUNNED Stupid About High...
Let's Call the Randi Weingarten-Prof. Alliance What It REALLY Is: A Cartel With...
SELF-OWN ALERT! Dem Rep Stomps on a Rake in Rush to Slam Trump...
'Did a COMPLETE 180': Tom Homan TORCHES Abigail Spanberger for BETRAYING Virginia and...
Let's GOOOO! Burlington School Officials in Panic As Students Refuse Taking Part in...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos