Family of English Woman Killed by African Asylum Seeker Told to ‘Tone Down’...
‘America’s BS Detector’ Claims 400,000 Were Killed in Revenge for October 7
Miami Just Got Stormed by Kilts, Bagpipes, and Brazilian Whistles
Blaming Musk: Ro Khanna and Chris Van Hollen Warn USAID Cuts Will Kill...
Illegal Alien Mother Sues Government Over Anxiety, Hair Loss After Masked ICE Agents...
WaPo: DOJ Will Appeal 'Her' Sentence to Keep Would-Be Assassin 'Sophie' Roske Behind...
Boston Middle School Sorry for Triggering Muslim Students With FACTS About Six Million...
Mehdi Hasan Notes Elon Musk Has Not Posted About White Child Sex Offender
Full Commie Trainwreck: NY Dem Brad Lander Embraces Radical Islamists, Hopes to Join...
Podcaster Airs Pro-Life Congresswoman’s Ectopic Pregnancy Story Despite Her Request Not To
CA State Senator Wiener Accuses Bible of Rainbow Hijacking – Because History Started...
Judge Blocks Trump Administration From Using Database to Ensure Noncitizens Can’t Vote
Judge Finds That DOJ Investigation of Tim Walz Was Politically Motivated; Gavin Newsom...
Trans-WHAT-icide? Chicago's Brandon Johnson Invents a Whole New Word to Deflect From His...
'DO IT'! Looks Like Elon Musk Has Had Enough of Rep. Ro Khanna's...

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement