Ms. Rachel Blasts ‘Christian Hypocrisy’ While Ignoring Who Actually Gives More to Charity
Sunny Hostin Explains That As a Black Woman in the US, Her 'Average'...
PhD’s Heart Breaks for Marine One Pilot Being Yelled at by Trump
The Rent-A-Mob Clocked in Again: Palestinian Flags Appear at Google’s Anti-AI Protest
Report: Black Woman's 'Lynching' Was Staged After She Was Killed During Drug Dispute
CNN's Jake Tapper Reports That Trump's 'Outside Advisors' Are Telling Him to Declare...
Female App State Student Arrested for Threatening to Massacre Viewers of ‘We Will...
'Moderate' Rep. Ro Khanna Calls for Release of Convicted Murderer and Terrorist From...
In the Toronto Star’s Latest Fever Dream, the U.S. Invades and Canada Turns...
Democratic Michigan Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Vows to Whoop Bill Maher's BLEEP on...
Trump Kicks Off the Tennessee vs. Texas Game With the Most Awesome Presidential...
Here's Coverage of Trump That CNN Doesn't Think You Can See Because They're...
FAFO of the Week: Brewery That Promised Free Beer When Trump Dies Gets...
David Axelrod Took a Jab at Trump's Red Carpet Treatment for Xi and...
CNN Gets a New Threat to Democracy to Freak Out About and I...

WATCH: Student Emma Gonzalez is dumbfounded when Dana Loesch explains NICS reporting guidelines

Emma Gonzalez, one of the loudest gun control voices to come out of Stoneman Douglas, said the following to NRA Spokeswoman Dana Loesch:

Dana Loesch, I want you to know that we will support your two children in the way that you will not. The shooter at our school used weapons on us that he obtained legally. Do you believe it should be harder to obtain semi-automatic weapons and the modifications for these semi-automatic weapons to make them fully automatic, like bump stocks?

Advertisement

Loesch came back with a hard-hitting response about the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) and its lack of data.

It was obvious from Gonzalez’s facial expressions that she had no idea about this information.

But, because Dana used logic, people are crying fowl.

Come on. Dana didn’t brandish a weapon. She didn’t pull out her gun and point it to Emma’s head. She pointed out REAL facts.

Is it because she makes sense or because she’s a woman?

Because then gun control advocates would have to admit that their current gun control laws are failing them.

Advertisement

Because they want to enjoy their Constitutionally-protected right? Get a grip.

No matter what Dana would have done, you wouldn’t have been happy. She was relating to the girl.

You clearly don’t understand how political donations work.

Touche.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement