President Biden Blasts 'Hateful Rhetoric' From Pro-Israel Demonstrators at Columbia
Alarming: Fire Marshal Jamaal Bowman Hilariously Duped by Pro-Hamas Twitter Parody Account
'Absolutely Incredible!' Julie Kelly Shares Unsealed Detail From Trump 'Classified Doc' Ca...
President Joe Biden Promises He Will Not Rest Until All American Hostages Are...
Trump-Hating Psychiatrist Proves She Needs a Civics Course While Opining About SCOTUS
Kristi Noem Needs More Courageous Advisers
WHOOPSIES: Emory University Professor Who Was Tackled by Police Confesses to Assaulting Of...
Biden Sees Economy 'Through the Eyes of Scranton and Working People' (Not THESE...
Russel Brand: From Raunchy to Redeemed
Bill Maher as the 'Voice of Reason' on the Left Continues to be...
'It's Not a Safe Place' Says Former Fed Prosecutor Who Was Punched in...
The New York Times EMBARRASSES Themselves in an Attempt to Cover for Lying...
Being Conservative Is the NEW Punk Rock and Biden's Interview With Stern Proves...
White House Down: Biden Aides Attempted to OUST Press Secretary KJP, Fail Because...
'I Love This Trooper!' No Nonsense Officer Shows How to Efficiently Remove a...

BREAKING: The last three men charged in Whitmer kidnapping plot acquitted

Michigan Office of the Governor via AP, File

The Post Millennial has the news:

Advertisement

From the article:

The last three men who were charged in a plot to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer have all been found not guilty. William Null, twin brother Michael Null and Eric Molitor were among the 14 charged in the alleged plot, and all three have been acquitted.

Adam Fox and Barry Croft Jr. were convicted of kidnapping conspiracy in 2022.

William and Michael Null as well as Eric Molitor were found not guilty of providing support for a terrorist act and a weapons charge, according to WLNS 6.

The three were accused of supporting the plan's leaders by participating in military-style drills, as well as traveling to see Whitmer’s northern Michigan vacation home.

Of course, previously there was a verdict that suggested that some of the people charged were entrapped by FBI agents, as explained in this Reason article:

From the article:

It looked like the case against the Michigan militia members who allegedly plotted to kidnap Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in October 2020 was going to be another data point in that trend: an extremist group riddled with FBI informants set up to take the fall for all their big talk. An unusual thing happened, though. The jury didn't buy it. When the verdicts were read a year and a half later in March, two of the militia members were acquitted, and the jury deadlocked on the other two. … 

The FBI has typically portrayed these investigations as efforts to thwart domestic terror, but all too often, the result has been to encourage or invent plots that were unlikely to succeed. In the Whitmer case and others, the feds weren't stopping terror: They were helping bumbling defendants plan and enact it.

Advertisement

However, if ABC’s reporting is to be believed, that doesn’t seem to be the issue in this case:

By this reporting, the jury appears to have found that they just didn’t do what they were accused of:

William Null and Molitor testified in their own defense, claiming they didn't know the true nature of the plot until the last minute.

William Null told the jury that while on a nighttime surveillance mission, he didn't know they were going to the governor's cabin.

Molitor testified he feared for his life during surveillance of the cabin with Adam Fox, one of the plot leaders who was convicted on federal charges.

‘What happens if we don't do this stuff?’ Molitor told the court. ‘He wasn't saying, 'Shoot somebody' -- that would have been a hard no. He didn't say, 'Blow something up' -- that would have been a hard no. He said, 'Take a video.' I took a video.’

Michael Null declined to testify.

Thus, William Null makes it sound like he didn’t know what he was a part of. That would be a complete defense. Meanwhile, Molitor appears to be suggesting his participation was involuntary. And while Michael Null didn’t testify, perhaps his brother’s testimony provided cover for him, too.

However, legal reporting is so endemically awful, we only feel semi-confident in concluding that entrapment was not part of the case.

Advertisement

Naturally, reactions are pouring in:

This next post was in response to a deleted post that said something like "was this the Klye Rittenhouse judge?"

Yep.

This is true. At its most basic, a militia is nothing more than a group of people assembling, with guns. The First Amendment protects the right of assembly, and the second protects the guns—with some narrow exceptions to both rights.

Advertisement

Meanwhile this guy thought it related to the drinking water problem in Flint:

The full text reads:

Why is the question not being asked as to why these men felt it necessary to assassinate the governor in the first place - FBI plot or not? We all know the stories; I have personally met people from Michigan who can attest, where the water in Flint is poisonous, where Detroit has become a byword for Hell and urban decay since the 1970's, where the infrastructure and society has decayed so much that years later the anti-government militia movement still thrives from the 1990's? Is mismanagement of the state so poor that people are willing to murder state officials as a result of it? Why have has the standard of living, the amount of crime, and the general state of things become so poor in that state, to the point of becoming less than 3rd World? Even in other nations in South America, and regions of Africa, they have adequate drinking water.

No rebellion occurs in history without some sort of justification, and these men are no exception to this rule. Perhaps - and I am only suggesting - that if the state government did not mismanage the state to the point of absolute ruin individuals like this would not be motivated to carry out attacks such as these.

Advertisement

As awful as that water situation was, we never heard of any claim that the water was the motivation.

We will also say this. Violence is a poor way to detect injustice. Naturally, as a matter of history, sometimes good people will be pushed too hard by the government or other powers in their lives and decide their only choice is to get violent. That’s basically what the founders argued in the Declaration of Independence, and that is the principle followed in various slave revolts.

But let’s not forget that evil can be violent, too:

The September 11, 2001 attack was motivated, in bin Laden’s own words, by a belief that if they killed a bunch of innocent people, Americans would recognize that Islam was awesome and start converting en masse—which strikes us as a slander on the Muslims who abhor such violence. Tim McVeigh believed that murdering a bunch of children of FBI and IRS agents would lead to white Christians rising up, overthrowing the government, and then nuking Israel—which definitely offends this Christian who happens to be white. Finally, the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church was motivated by racism. The point is that historically sometimes violence is motivated by good causes, and sometimes it is motivated by bad—sometimes downright idiotic—causes.

Advertisement

Discernment is necessary.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement