Protester Says Officers Shot Him in the Face at Close Range With Non-Lethal...
Daily Beast Gloats Over 'Whistleblower’ Revealing Personal Data of ICE Agents in Data...
House Oversight Posts Audio and Video From Hillary Clinton's Deposition (When's the Arrest...
Bluesky Takes a Shot at X While Recognizing It as the 'Global Town...
Illegal Tries to Ram His Way Out of ICE Vehicle Blockade; One Officer...
Here's How Seriously ANOTHER Dem Takes Their Warning About Devastation Climate Change Will...
Democrats' Perfect Spokesman: Guy Who Struggles with English Demands We Abolish Border Cop...
Perfect Zeros From The Judges: The Lincoln Project's Epic Anne Frank Faceplant
MS NOW's Lawrence O'Donnell: 'Every Video From Every Angle' Shows Renée Good Posed...
State Dept. Pauses Visa Processing From Countries Whose Migrants Take Welfare at ‘Unaccept...
Sen. Josh Hawley Asked This Doctor If Men Can Get Pregnant and She...
Pramila Jayapal Rewrites American History—Here’s Who Actually Built the Country
The Digital Rage: MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Gets Touchy Over Trump’s Middle Finger...
From 'Not for Sale' to White House Talks: Trump's Greenland Power Play Goes...
Mike Johnson Makes Massive Prediction for Republican Chances in the Midterms
Premium

The Hill seems to have forgotten that only women can get pregnant

It’s really important for pregnant women to be aware of environmental risks to their unborn children so that they can do what they can to protect their little one.

And it’s good for outlets like The Hill to help shine a spotlight on some of those environmental risks.

Unfortunately, in doing so in this particular case, The Hill has also shone a spotlight on its own embarrassing mission to placate the Wokeness Mob:

Pregnant what, now?

Pregnant people.

Pregnant people.

Pregnant people.

Pregnant people. That phrase actually appears multiple times in that article. That article, which was written by someone named Sharon, who is presumably a female woman (forgive us, Sharon, if we’re jumping to conclusions based on the fact that you have a woman’s name).

As a person who’s been pregnant a few times, I can honestly say that I appreciated people recognizing that I was — and actually still am, for what it’s worth — a woman. My husband, as much as he might’ve liked to try it, was unable to carry any of our kids. Because, you know, he’s a man. And men have not yet figured out how to be pregnant. Not that they’re in any rush, heh.

Needless to say, this “pregnant person” BS really pisses me off. Sometimes it can be difficult being a woman, but this is who I am. And if someone had referred to me when I was pregnant as a “pregnant person,” I would’ve given them my death glare. And maybe a smack or two upside the head.

It’s easy if you try, The Hill. Really. Go on. Try it.

This is what scientists call “the erasure of credibility.”

***

Related:

AP updates its style guidelines on when to use ‘pregnant people’ versus ‘women’

***

Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement