Woke Segregation: London Play to Have 'All-Black' Audience Nights to Stop 'White Gaze'
NBC labels a journalist 'A former singer of a David Bowie tribute band'...
Canada Goes Full 'Minority Report': Proposed 'Hate Speech' Bill Is Dystopian Nightmare
Conservatives on Twitter Send a Message to Leftists by Taking Over #WhiteRuralRage Hashtag
Not Just Harvard: Columbia University Diversity Officer Plagiarized Dissertation From Wiki...
NOT Happening: 'Advisers' Say Older People Should Get Another COVID Shot, Get Resounding...
Government Won't Help You: NY Couple's Dream Home Occupied by Squatter Who Has...
John Kirby Walks Back a Biden Claim in RECORD Time (This Time About...
Riley Gaines, Seth Dillon Deliver on Promise to Compensate Women for Refusing to...
We Did NOT Have John Fetterman Hilariously MOCKING Rashida Tlaib on Our Bingo...
NY Times Thought Everyone Should Know Stephen Colbert Declared SCOTUS Unconstitutional
Chaya Raichik Calls Elon Musk OUT for Reinstating Rules Around Pronouns and Misgendering
Trump Must Not Think Biden Will Be the Democrat's Nominee ... Just Sayin'
Make 1984 Fiction Again! You'll Never GUESS the Award CBS' President Won AFTER...
'Define WOMAN': Women Take Letitia James APART for Her Lame Message to Kick...

The Hill seems to have forgotten that only women can get pregnant

It’s really important for pregnant women to be aware of environmental risks to their unborn children so that they can do what they can to protect their little one.

And it’s good for outlets like The Hill to help shine a spotlight on some of those environmental risks.

Unfortunately, in doing so in this particular case, The Hill has also shone a spotlight on its own embarrassing mission to placate the Wokeness Mob:

Pregnant what, now?

Pregnant people.

Pregnant people.

Pregnant people.

Pregnant people. That phrase actually appears multiple times in that article. That article, which was written by someone named Sharon, who is presumably a female woman (forgive us, Sharon, if we’re jumping to conclusions based on the fact that you have a woman’s name).

As a person who’s been pregnant a few times, I can honestly say that I appreciated people recognizing that I was — and actually still am, for what it’s worth — a woman. My husband, as much as he might’ve liked to try it, was unable to carry any of our kids. Because, you know, he’s a man. And men have not yet figured out how to be pregnant. Not that they’re in any rush, heh.

Needless to say, this “pregnant person” BS really pisses me off. Sometimes it can be difficult being a woman, but this is who I am. And if someone had referred to me when I was pregnant as a “pregnant person,” I would’ve given them my death glare. And maybe a smack or two upside the head.

It’s easy if you try, The Hill. Really. Go on. Try it.

This is what scientists call “the erasure of credibility.”



AP updates its style guidelines on when to use ‘pregnant people’ versus ‘women’


Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!


Trending on Twitchy Videos