The Atlantic Wonders If a Bearded Pete Buttigieg Can Convince America He’s a...
DHS Says It Won't Comply With Denver's New Ban on Law Enforcement Agents...
Kurt Schlichter BODYING Conservative Wannabe Whining About Trump's Iran Strikes Is a BEAUT...
Operation Epic Fury Reminds MS NOW’s Chris Hayes of 9/11
ICE SHREDS 'Asinine, Legally Illiterate' Abigail Spanberger for Putting Violent Illegal Ov...
Iranian-American Journo Masiah Alinejad Has a DIRECT MESSAGE Just for Kamala Harris and...
'Secret' Iran Supreme Leader Meeting Destroyed As Rubio Sets the Record Straight
Wait, What?! Bill Clinton Casually Drops YUGE JB Pritzker Epstein Bombshell During His...
What a DICK! Jonathan Turley OWNS Richard Blumenthal With His OWN Words for...
Megyn Kelly Got Operation Epic Fury in Iran DEAD Wrong
Brit Hume HUMILIATES Chuck Todd and Chris Cillizza As Only HE Can for...
SUPER Inconvenient (for Democrats) Obama Video Drops and We Are Here FOR IT...
Iranian Women Celebrating FREEDOM Take Nasty, 'Antisemitic Karen' Slut-Shaming Them As HOO...
Eric Swalwell Tries Picking a Fight With Dave Portnoy Over Operation Epic Fury...
Jihadis NEVER Learn: Israel Takes Out Gathering of Islamic Experts Meeting to Select...

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement