Crazed Communist Claims Cuban Lung Cancer Cure Canceled by Capitalists
Mane Event: Debut of The Rock’s Live-Action ‘Maui’ Has ‘Moana’ Trailer Viewers Curling...
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani Visits Criminals on Rikers Island for Ramadan
Rachel Zegler 'Finally Speaks Out' on The Failure of 'Snow White'. Surprise Reveal:...
Trump Erects Christopher Columbus Statue on White House Grounds to 'Reshape' Culture and...
ICE Raid Exposes 134 Workers Using Fake Social Security Numbers
Governor JB Pritzker Responds to Death of Sheridan Gorman, Doesn’t Say Alleged Killer...
Ms. Rachel Fighting to Close ICE Facility That Detains Children
THWAP! Newsom's Press Account Stomped on a Projection Rake Trying to Turn Trump...
Data Republican: Dems Spending Millions to Promote Election Integrity in Developing Nation...
Tucker Fatigue Hits Critical Levels: Now He's Simping for Sharia Over America
Parenting Shouldn't Feel Like an 18-Year Prison Sentence – And That's Why Birth...
Newsweek Looks at Trump's Chances at Being Removed Via 25th Amendment as Calls...
Ilhan Omar's Progeny Praises Dictatorship – Because Nothing Says 'Solidarity' Like Partyin...
Sen. Dick Blumenthal Says ICE at Airports Will Brutalize Families While Shooting and...

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement