Nancy Pelosi Shines a Gaslight: 'Don't Blame Me, I Didn't Know Biden's Brain...
Star Tribune Hails Klobuchar As First Woman to Lead MN Dems — Skips...
Marco Rubio Declares He Is Not MAHA — RFK’s Sauerkraut-Meat Diet Is Crazy...
NBC News Waiting for Milwaukee Election Officials to Fix 'Human Error' Made for...
Socialist Holiday-Hater Francesca Hong Lost in WI After Sudden 'Human Error' Delayed the...
Scott Jennings Says Holiday Hatred Is Window Into Souls of Dem Party’s Anti-American...
Police Get a Bad Rap — but Moments Like This Show They Deserve...
What Would Happen to a Rapist With No Police or Prisons? DSA Rep....
Fledgling Sports Journalist Francesca Hong Learned That Sometimes You Have Bad Takes on...
Daily Wire: Why Are So Many Celebs Raising Trans Kids?
Leftist Influencers Note That Joe Biden Never Hid in a Catering Cart Like...
Mayor Scamdani: 'Defund the Police … Until My Wife Needs Free Bodyguards for...
NYT Reporter in 2026: What Happened to Investigation FBI Wanted Done Into Trump’s...
Francesca Hong’s Election-Day Staff Purge: Scrubbing the Crazy So WI Won't Notice Until...
Redhead Rejected: AOC Quietly Boots Fiance Riley Roberts

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement