Small Business Week Needs Help
Speculation Abounds About Carlson Not Going on Shapiro
Erick Erickson Warns Republicans About 2020
Poll Looks Into American Mindset About War
YIKES: Mallory McMorrow Doubles Down on Smug, NASTY Comments About Rural Americans and...
Justine Bateman Describes Gavin Newsom's BIZARRE Hand Gestures and Unnerving Behavior in 3...
CNN's Kasie Hunt Tries Tripping Scott Jennings Up With Anti-America Poll and HOOBOY...
Abigail Spanberger Can Take Her Unity Post and Stick It Where the Sun...
WHY Would He Do THAT?! Ruben Gallego Tries QUIETLY Deleting Certain Threads With...
Lefties PANIC As DataRepublican EXPOSES Miles Taylor's Unsecured GTFO ICE Site in THREAD...
LOL! Just Cement Him As the GOAT: John Kennedy DROPS Iran Regime the...
Project Runway: Video That Imagines Marco Rubio Running Spirit Airlines Is Just Plane...
Post Millennial Reporter Mobbed by Antifa at ICE Detention Facility
Justice Kagan Writes in Dissent That the VRA ‘Was Born of the Literal...
Elizabeth Warren Ran With ANOTHER Opportunity to Get Ratioed (This Time With Her...

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement