'How Wonderful... We Never Anticipated This': CNN Stunned by Southern Hospitality During W...
Here's Why Class Warfare Lefties Are Ignoring THESE Working Folks Profiting From Elon...
'Tax the Rich!' Chant Hits Too Close to Home — Hasan Piker Panics...
Literally Can’t Watch Seinfeld Anymore: Mehdi Hasan Melts Down After Jerry Refuses to...
Finally, a Democrat With a Spine: Fetterman Torches Platner as a Bona Fide...
Raw Story Journo Defends Platner’s Nazi Tattoo as ‘Drunk Mistake’ — Ex-Girlfriends Say...
Harwood Sneers at Former Plumber Markwayne Mullin — Then Wonders Why Dems Got...
Impeachmental Illness: Scott Jennings Burns CNN Dems Who Claim Party’s Not Running on...
California Democrats Proclaim (Or Try To) Who Is and Who Is NOT 'Allowed'...
Texas Dem Bobby Pulido Bragged About Springing Pedophile Bandmate from Jail — Now...
Does Anyone in the Media Want to Ask 51 Ex Intel Officials for...
Woke Superintendent Who Tried to Stop TPUSA Chapter at School Shown the DOOR...
Just WOW: Check Out Alleged TX Parole Supervisor’s Rant AGAINST Metcalf Family After...
Ilhan Omar Screws Herself: Camera Catches Her Admit She Doesn't Belong
Elizabeth Warren's Triggering Over Elon Is Getting Ratioed So Hard We Almost Feel...

Panicked Politico warns that SCOTUS could soon make it a lot more difficult for the executive branch to control 'wide swaths of American life'

Politico is sounding the alarm over an upcoming Supreme Court ruling that could threaten everyday life as we know it:

Advertisement

More from Politico:

The upcoming decision on the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate oversight offers the conservative justices an opportunity to undermine federal regulations on a host of issues, from drug pricing and financial regulations to net neutrality. Critics of the EPA have clamored for the high court to do just that, by declaring it unlawful for federal agencies to make “major” decisions without clear authorization from Congress.

The Supreme Court and several Republican-appointed judges have invoked the same principle repeatedly during the past year to strike down a series of Biden administration responses to the coronavirus pandemic. Liberal legal scholars worry that the EPA case could yield an aggressive version of that thinking — unraveling much of the regulatory state as it has existed since the New Deal.

And we wouldn’t want that! 

More:

That has implications for other major rules that President Joe Biden’s agencies are writing or defending in court, including wetlands protections, limits on car and truck pollution, insurance coverage for birth control under Obamacare, and even the Trump administration’s attempts to lower drug prices.

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do is going to literally handcuff the federal government from taking action to protect Americans’ health safety and the environment,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health law professor at Georgetown University.

Advertisement

“A narrow reading of what the federal agencies can do”? You mean, like, respecting the notion of separation of powers?

Is anyone else failing to see what the downside would be?

What Jeremy Clarkson said.

We really are cool with the executive branch’s — and federal government’s — role in our everyday lives being reduced.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement