Neera Tanden Fooled by AI Video Featuring Viking in Bathtub on Wheels Escaping...
Don Lemon Better Pray He Didn’t Violate Members’ Civil Rights While Disrupting Church...
Don Lemon Leads ICE Protestors to Church - Just NOT How You Think
Sen. Rick Scott Lists 4 Goals 'That Should Be Our Focus to Grow...
DAMN, SON! Eric Swalwell Threatens ICE Agents and Mike Davis Tells Him to...
Hannah Gadsby's Awesome Idea to 'Subvert The Male Gaze'
WOW: Jay Jones In SUCH a Rush to Rob Millions of Virginians of...
Jake Tapper GRILLS Mayor Jacob Frey (Just Kidding; He Let Frey Filibuster for...
Not TODAY, Margaret! Kristi Noem ENDS Margaret Brennan in HEATED Debate Over Arrested...
Virginia Speaker (and Former Crack Dealer) Gets High on His Own Supply Accusing...
Sorry, WHAT? Scott Jennings Takes Holier-Than-Thou Lefty Claiming Repubs Have No Moral Com...
Karoline Leavitt Goes Straight FIRE Warning CBS Not to FAFO With Trump Interview...
Well Well Well, This Certainly Doesn't Help the Fraud-Happy Somalis
Aaron Rupar’s Snotty Question About What Trump Could do to Make the Country...
X BODIES Nobel Foundation for ELITIST Post Insisting Machado Giving Her Prize to...
Premium

Merriam-Webster has also tweaked their definition of 'girl' (and 'boy') in order to be a safe space for all the little trans kids out there

Yesterday, we told you about Merriam-Webster’s sneaky little amendment to their definition of “female.” Here it is again:

A number of people pointed out that if “female” means “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male,” Merriam-Webster’s definition of “male” would have to be a lot clearer than their definition of “female.” Well, guess what: it isn’t. It’s this:

So, a female is the opposite of a male, which is the opposite of a female, which is the opposite of a male, which is the opposite of a female … and by this point, you’re probably dizzy from going around in circles. We know we are.

But join us if you will on one more little trip. Let’s take a look at how Merriam-Webster defines “girl,” shall we?

What was wrong with “a young woman”? Why did they need to change it to “a person whose gender identity is female”?

And in case you’re wondering, yes, they did, in fact, do something similar for boy:

This is getting ridiculous. And stupid. And anti-scientific. And anti-language. And anti-sane.

When did words stop meaning things? Because we’d like to go back to the time before that. This timeline is just too much.

We wish. Boy (pun intended), do we wish this were all just a silly joke, instead of a sickening one.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement