The Economist Outs Paw Patrol As Gender-Normative Pro-Police Propaganda
Here's a Call From the London Police About 'Malicious Communication' Set to LEGO...
Report: FBI Had 14 Informants on Biden Corruption but Ran Op to Dismiss...
Dem Gov. Hopeful Cindy Holscher in Red-State Kansas: 'No Idea If Jesus Was...
Mehdi Hasan Wonders If the Press Will Be Harder on Trump Now That...
'Playing My Own Words Is Defamation': Hasan Piker Melts Down Over Scott Jennings...
Good: Macro Rubio Did Not Answer CNN Reporter Who Asked If He Put...
Rick Wilson Is Late Getting in His Dig on Trump ‘Cowering Like a...
'Hitting the Stereotype SO on the Nose'! Pics From Francesca Hong's Farewell Event...
Ballot Pox: MS NOW’s Jen Psaki Admits Democrat Leaders Pick Nominees, Not the...
Al Jazeera Reports Ilhan Omar Won Her Primary Overwhelmingly Without Support From AIPAC
NO WAY! Journos Might Have Been Slightly Over-Dramatic About the 'Decoy' Air Force...
Florida’s Secret Sauce Revealed: Crime Crashes, Illegals Out, and America’s Safest Big Sta...
Abdul El-Sayed Makes a Hong-esque Pivot and Now Loves Football ('There Are No...
AOC to Journo on Breakup: 'No Comment on My Private Life' (She Just...

Novelist Celeste Ng has a message for all you 'transphobes' too ignorant to acknowledge things like 'women are a subset of birthing people'

“Inclusive language” is all the rage these days. Or rather, it’s at the root of a whole lot of the rage these days.

On the heels of Bette Midler’s “transphobic” comments about how it’s wrong to de-feminize women and reduce them to their lady parts (comments for which Midler has since apologized because she lacks the proverbial balls that Macy Gray has), “Little Fires Everywhere” author Celeste Ng went on a little rant to dispel the notion that there’s something inherently wrong with “inclusive language” being used to systematically erase women’s innate identities:

Advertisement

Maybe Celeste is the one who needs to think on things.

No, Celeste. If we’re upset about “and other birthing people,” it’s because biological women are the only “birthing people” out there and it’s frankly offensive — not to mention anti-scientific — to suggest otherwise.

Old and busted: women’s empowerment.

New hotness: women’s degradation.

Sorry, honey, but people who understand and respect basic biology are not “transphobes.”

Advertisement

Why can’t “trans rights” activists like Celeste Ng understand that drawing distinctions between men and women doesn’t diminish trans people, but merely aligns with science? Trans women are not the same as biological women, and trans men are not the same as biological men. That’s not transphobia. That’s not bigotry. That’s just the truth, inconvenient though it may be.

Advertisement

Go ahead and donate all you want, Celeste. It doesn’t change the fact that you’re wrong and that the ideology you’re pushing indisputably hurts the cause of feminism (as in actual feminism) and women in general.

***

Related:

‘Found the racist’! Little Fires Everywhere author Celeste Ng’s ‘general rule’ about racism quickly comes back to bite her — hard

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement